With the economy the way it is? You've GOT to be kidding! I lost my job in April after 13 years with the company... and nothing is on the horizon at all.
OpusCroakus
[quote]And this image is ALSO completely legal - or else Microsoft themselves would have requested the hosting company to pull it down! Sorry, but that's a hugely flawed argument. You could as well state that rape is legal as long as noone threaten with a law suite.[/quote] Well, I can see that I won't be changing your opinion here mickeko. However, so that others do not also take your flawed advice: As one of 300 recipients of VMware's vExpert 2009 award, I do believe I know what I am
Mickeko - Correct in that VMware themselves did not put out the image. The VM was created and the download is hosted by bagvapp. See the informational page on VMware's site at http://www.vmware.com/appliances/directory/node/146943, and the actual downloads http://bagside.com/bagvapp/. It is NOT illegal, and it is NOT a hack using freely available VMware runtime components. The VMware Player is completely legal. And this image is ALSO completely legal - or else Microsoft themselves would hav
[quote]I want to DL it, but I don't have the extra PC to put it on. I really don't wanna put it on this one. [/quote] Po - refer to my reply in the post from the last poll. You don't have to download the Win7 RC from Microsoft... you can download a pre-built VMware virtual machine with Win7 RC already installed in it. You can download the free VMware Player software for your Vista PC to run the free VM on it. No changes to your existing OS or hardware, and no conflicts with the beta/RC OS!
Personally, just like Vista, I have no reason to run Win7 in a new partition or on my main partition. I won't be downloading the RC build from MS directly... I plan on downloading the prebuilt VMware virtual machine of the Win7 RC, and run it safely there in a nice sandbox. So Stephen Lee-Woolf, I believe there should be a 4th answer as I don't really fall into any of the existing 3! I will say that the Win7 beta VM I have run a few times does seem to work better than any version of Vista I'v
Yes, it works with XP Pro. Unfortunately, there is a conflict between Fences and DeskScapes on XP. If you enable DeskScapes, then even though Fences is still running, all the icons appear, just as if Fences is not running. Anyone know if Stardock developers are working on this, or if we're just stuck with choosing one or the other on XP?
[quote]I still can't see it being the millionth purchase though. If we are approaching 1M customers then Impulse must have well over 1M purchases.[/quote] Not necessarily. There are MANY of us users out here who have been customers of Stardock for many years - and only installed Impulse because it has replaced the older (and in my opinion, still waaaayyy more user-friendly, easier, and WORKING) Stardock Central. I have not purchased anything since the up(down)grade to Impulse. Mainly becau
[quote]Opus, this update is only available through Impulse at the moment.[/quote] Gee, that's real nice. I *still* cannot use Impulse from my work, and since I have been banned from the forums [Since Seabass locked my forum account after deciding that you didn't want to read about users who disagree with your software design principles, and have technical issues as well], can no longer post about my issues. I'll gladly post the info here... And, yes, I had my laptop home this morning and c
Why isn't it showing in SDC either?
Hmmm... yet one more reason to stay away from Impulse. :-(
[quote]I sure can. +1. I'm so sick of the blagosphere creaming their pants over Apple's products. Like Mike said, gimme a Nokia N95 any day. But heck - I don't want all those features in a phone. I can't imagine needing to browse the internet when I'm out and about - I want to be out and about. I've got an mp3 player that has much higher sound quality than anything Apple can put out, so I wouldn't want the iPhone's crappy music player. Plus, I just like t
[quote]Pretty != bloat.[/quote] Please refer to Gardenerstouch's forum posts. I agree with almost all of his/her points in them. Especially for users with disabilities and for dial-up/slow 'net users, Impulse is horrible. Bloat? Absolutely! There is little or no reason for all the pretty graphics and eye candy in this distribution utility. If it is truly intended as more than a distribution utility, that's fine... but please give us an option to have a utility which IS just a dist
[quote]So that we're all on the same page, Impulse isn't just a download manager ala Stardock Central. It is a full blown digital distribution platform. [/quote] So where does that leave those of us users out here who DO want just a download manager ala Stardock Central? Is there going to be an "Impulse Lite" version which does just that? Because seriously, all I want is an application which I can use to download/archive/install/update my Stardock software. I don't want all these extra f
[quote]Few buttons and the big one lead the user to what to pick.[/quote] Actually this is precisely where I disagree. First, the "one big button" doesn't even LOOK like a button. If it did, do you honestly think that you would see so many posts in this forum asking where/how to change Impulse's preferences? Users do not recognize that the round thing in the top left corner which looks like an icon and is placed exactly where an icon would be for the past 20 years of Windows applicat
[quote]Personally I prefered SDC because its simple and did just what I needed it to...something to keep my stuff updated and chat....thats all I've ever used SDC for. I could do without all the bells and whistles of Impulse. Don't get me wrong...Impulse looks pretty and all that...its just that I like to keep it simple. [/quote] Another vote here. I'm using SDC until they pry it out of my cold dead hands. Far too many issues with Impulse so far, and it's way over complicated and gussied up
Seabass: After 2 days of pulling my hair out, I finally was able to completely wipe out the .Net framework 2 and higher, and successfully reinstalled all this morning (2.0 SP1, 3.0 SP1, 3.5). I then reinstalled the Impulse_Full, and successfully ran it. I'll see what happens after a reboot and a day or two, as I *had* gotten Impulse to load and connect once but the next day it wouldn't work (and my .Net stuff was corrupted (couldn't even load up any project in VS2008 at all). I'm still worki
One step forward, 17 steps backward. Now, the latest Impulse installer crashes during setup (although it reaches the screen where it claims that Impulse has been installed successfully. Error: AppName impulse.exe, AppVer 1.0.0.0, ModName kernel32.dll, ModVer 5.1.2600.5512, Offset 00012aeb. So I have no idea if the proxy issues have been resolved or not, as I cannot even install Impulse now, let alone attempt to launch it!!! Please make sure that ALL application updates occur on SDC f
neophil - you might be better off starting a new thread about your issues/questions, as they seem to be getting lost among all of the other problems in this "support" thread. :-)
Charles - I use both PortableApps and U3 on my 4GB Ativa U3 drive. With PortableApps, you can add any additional app you want if there is a "portable" version, even if there is no specific installer - simply by creating a folder underneath the PortableApps folder on your device, and copying the required files there. CCleaner, Defraggler, and Recuva all work fine that way. Also, the burner utility I use, UltraISO, works fine as a portable app the same way.
Amen, WebGizmos! My sentiments exactly. I cannot and will not "upgrade" my systems to Vista, as I run both plenty of older apps which will not run on it, and require better use of my system's resources for my programs, NOT my OS! [quote]Been running it for a year and as far as I,m concerned theres no comparison with XP, I normally run 4 or 5 different progs at the same time, some thing I couldn't even think of doing withe XP. It's a lot more stable.[/quote] Terribly sorry to h
Ahh, I did not realize that the various forums were not all hosted together on one site, since they appeared here on WinCustomize forums. Thanks for the explanation!
OK, prior to a couple of days ago there was an entire section of this forum titled "Stardock Games" underneath "Stardock Support". They seem to have vanished. Is this an error, or was there an announcement which I missed letting us know that subforum was going away? If they have gone away by decision, where are we supposed to post questions regarding the games in Drengin.net / TotalGaming / whatever fancy new name Stardock is calling the system this year?
Sigh... once again, SDC not showing the proper updates. Only version 3.99.149 showing as available/installed. PLEASE, Stardock... until Impulse is out of beta and working for ALL users, PLEASE continue to update SDC correctly! You are really annoying long-term users!!
Might be a Vista thing. AVG 8.0 free, WindowBlinds 6.1 (build 55 x86), Windows XP Pro SP3 here, and all skinning *appears* to be working correctly. Consider upgrading your PC to WinXP.
Very interesting article here [link="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/05/07/mass-effect-wins-award-worst-pc"]WWW Link[/link] with many of the commenters commending Stardock on doing things "the right way".