You Righties don' t complain about Rwanda unless you also want to gig Bush for ignoring Sudan. I don't mind people thinking that Clinton was a great president. What I do mind is that not one Democrat here has a problem with hundreds of thousands of Africans dying, and then they bitch about Reagan "letting African children starve." Even I can
my compassion knows limits If liberals don't have compassion for people they disagree with, then I really doubt they can be called compassionate. If it can though, then anybody can be called as compassionate in the liberal sense, because I doubt anybody in the world is not compassionate to at least one group of people. <TABLE cellpadding
I remeber Ronnie not giving a rats a** about the rest of the world when he was president. What's funny is that when Clinton did that (i.e. Rwanda), you guys applaud him. Is it because they're Africans, while the Bosnians were whiter? I hate to play the race card, but I want to understand why you guys think nothing wrong of him ignoring the geno
Bill Clinton ADDRESSED the problem in rwanda....however, Reagan did not Address the problems in Africa. I'm no history major, but the history I read seems to conclude that genocide did occur in Rwanda, so when did Clinton do anything about it? Did he actually send troops over there to prevent it and they just were too weak against the powerful
Are you also saying that perjury is not a serious crime and shouldn't be one at all?
He also allowed the genocide in Rwanda to occur. You criticized Reagan for ignoring starving children in Africa, but you ignore this fact about Clinton. Why is that?
I like how compassionate liberals are happy that a man is dead. And they say liberals aren't compassionate loving people! With this, and the open-minded article that pigeonholes millions of people into two terrible stereotypes, it's a shame that people don't understand how super enlightened you guys are.
Isn't that just making assumptions? Do you actually know their other policies and their work conditions? True, I don't know for sure. If they will fire somebody who's obese and/or consumes unhealthy foods and drinks, then I guess I have no problem with their claim to promoting a healthy lifestyle. Otherwise, I just see it as another "smoking is
I wouldn't mind the strict health policies, but they aren't that strict. A company that claims to be all about healthy employees that condones employees having unhealthy diets and being in unhealthy conditions is pretty hypocritical.
I think that people are taking this a bit out of proportion. How come nobody is complaining about all the unfair laws that employers have to deal with? Has anyone actually seen what is considered "disabled" in the disability acts? Has anyone really looked into what it takes to fire somebody with an illegal drug use problem who enters rehab? I look at this as an example
By "health foods" I am referring to fresh fruits and veggies. Organic milk and pesticide free products. Eggs from vegetarian Chickens (yeah, think about that one for awhile). And, yes, they do cost more. Go through a store and buy pre-prepared foods, like frozen Lasagna, frozen Broccoli, conventional milk, conventional peanut butter, regular coffee. Then go through an
The point is that people don't have to smoke at all. And, the difference between forcing "health food" versus quitting smoking is that eating Health Food will cost you more (I can prove that by showing you grocery bills from before I started buying at a Whole Foods store versus conventional food at a regular market) but quitting smoking will cost you less. </TABL
Why is Hillary Clinton upset with the rise of abortions? I thought abortions weren't wrong. If anything, she should be happy that people are having abortions so the teen pregnancy rate won't rise.
With being overweight, you have to eat to live. People who have a problem can not simply "quit". There have been many studies that show that obesity is hereditary (like high cholesterol), and there are a few medical conditions that cause weight gain (like various endocrine problems). True, people do have to eat, but the companies can demand tha
So, in these refugee camps, they are allowed to leave and go where the please, or are they forced to stay there?
Actually were not parasites. In the Matrix, Mr. Smith has an interesting take: AGENT SMITH: Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment. But you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply and multiply until every natural resource is consumed and the only way you can survive is to spread to anot
If the broad definition is used, yes, that is true. But in a sense it is not, as all living species are interdependent on others for survival. BUT...and this is part of my point...the blogger in question derided me heavily for some of my statements about the tsunami aid. IF we are "all parasites", then the tsunami was nothing more than nature's flea bath and we shouldn't d
When you think about it, all humans are parasites, because we are dependent on something else (the Earth) for existence and support and we do not make a useful or adequate return.
I can't wait until people are fired for being overweight. After all, being overweight does increase health risks and health costs. I'm sure nobody who agrees with the anti-smoking policy of this company will disagree with my anti-fat policy. Are health costs also higher for women?
y definition, a concentration camp is a large detention center created for political opponents, aliens, specific ethnic or religious groups, or civilians of a critical war-zone. So, the Palestinians are stuck in the West Bank and are not allowed to leave? If so, then I'll agree that it's wrong for Israel to force the Palestinians to stay in a ghe
If this article was a joke, then it's great! However, it seems that some people are actually taking this article seriously. Do people really have their heads that far up their own asses?
So, go ahead, give the Israelis props for discriminating and then, out of the other side of your mouth call someone else a racist for comparing the West Bank to a concentration camp--ah, the hypocrisy--how do you sleep at night? I could sleep at night because comparing the West Bank to a concentration camp is so ridiculous. I'm sure most Jews tha
His knee is not rising. It is the angle they are showing it at. If you watch in the next frame you can see it is the way his knees are bent. As far as that being a phallic on the cover, I don't buy it. But if it is true and that is a phallic, it appears to be coming out of that little characters head. Does this make him a phallic-head? It being h
Great job, dharma! It's great having a sleuth to expose the lies on this site and help maintain its integrity! I want to know what you think, JU. Is it ethically okay to make up a story and not label it as such? Is it okay to write fiction and tell everyone that it's fact? Given that this site is syndicated and is easily accessible to the public, is it ethical
There's sound in space.
JoeUser Forums