I agree. Sure, there was one great part (where American Dad is playing the thief to help his son impress a girl and the scene where the fish is inside the German's body), but it's too much like Family Guy. If it does stay on the air, then hopefully Seth will take it out of Family Guy's shadow.
Thanks everybody! Interesting comments all around, and although I did write this little piece in an antagonistic sort of way, I'm glad that actual discussions have taken place. I guess my main point is that nobody has to be a mother if they don't want to or if they can't handle it. Sure, if abortion is ever outlawed, then this won't apply, but right now, there's so many options that a pregnant woman has that she isn't forced into anything she
That wasn't the point I was making at all. I'm just saying that that it is neither nature or nuture but both. You seem to be soley in the nuture camp I 'm just saying you're probably wrong....sorry I mean "WRONG!" I understand your point, and I could agree that it, along with pretty much every other psy
Still waiting to see if it was wrong for American soldiers to kill Nazis and Japanese soldiers in World War II.
you may disagree with me (in fact, im sure you will) but in my experience, men who insist a woman to whom they arent married give birth to a child the two of them werent actively trying to conceive are most likely motivated by a determination to dominate her in one way or another rather than out of any sense of fatherly obligatio
Most genetic traits, especially behavioural ones, are a result of both nature and nuture. There isn't really a nature or nuture debate anymore as we realise that they are both equally important. There may be many different biological and psychological routes to being gay. So, it might be as natural as b
Gee its weird that a woman might get emotionally attached to a baby she's carrying - there only a few million years of evolution behind the emotion. Giving up a baby for adoption isn't easy either. Last I heard Bush was anti-abortion too so if he did have it his way she couldn't abort. I get emotionally
Here's a fake conversation I had with a single pregnant woman: Her: "I hate Bush! Because of him, I won't be able to get the welfare I need to support the child I'm about to have and the father's in prison for life, so he can't support me." Me: "Why are you having the child if you can't afford him?" Her: "It wasn't my choice. I used birth control, but I still got pregnant." Me: "So? You could still have an abortion. Then you wouldn't have a child you can't afford."
So what you are saying is that the female is totally responsible when premarital sex results in conception--she either has to foot the bill and the emotional turmoil of an abortion or else foot the entire bill of raising a child? Considering that it's her choice , and considering that she the c
With all the hoopla surrounding Sponge Bob's endorsement of homosexuality on a video about tolerance, and the debunking of "myths" included on that video, I felt it appropriate to contribute to the tolerance by exposing a few more of the myths about homosexuality. Much of what people know about homosexuality is based either on bad logic, double standards, or pseudoscience. Hopefully, I'll be able to shed light on the lies I have heard people spread so that they will evaporate under the sc
Globalisation + Free Trade Agreements + World Trade Organisation = less local jobs+ corporate greed+ cheap labour+ exploitation I would just add a few more to that: union workers who ask for higher wages, wage laws, costly work standards, thrifty customers, lack of an isolationist mentality, foreigners who don't buy A
What's funny is that women really have no reason to have a child, since abortion is still legal, so by having a child, they are consciously choosing to have one. If the father isn't married to the mother, then I don't see how he comes into play (except for the sperm, which still doesn't change the fact that the child is her property and her choice). However, if a woman has a child when she's married to the father, and after the child is born (or af
First, we have to understand that the big bang, evolution, and all other science is not mutually exclusive from the idea of a God, although it might conflict with some literal interpretations of the stories of the Bible. But science and scientists work only with what they can observe, and unless humans become omniscient, they will never be able to comprehend the origins of existence itself. Anybody who says otherwise is more dogmatic than scientifi
It's the Adults who take a child's act of kindness and twist it out of proportion. I think the parents of the girls and Mrs Young probably exchanged words, someone got their feelings hurt and used the kids' good deed to mask their true intentions. Being adults they took advantage of the system to get each other's point across.</T
I don't really know what he meant, but what I think he meant was if it's okay for Iraqi soldiers to videotape said treatment of terrorists, it must be okay for terrorists to do the same to Iraqi soldiers, not that the insurgents haven't hurt civilians And that still involves ignoring the difference between beheading Iraqi soldiers (which isn't th
Yes, the girls did use some bad judgment in how they went about delivering the cookies, but nothing they did warranted the lawsuit, and that's what makes Young such a bitch, deserving of what she's getting now.
My apologies again, as I forget I am talking to those who need to be spoon-fed. I did not mean to equate civilians with those that are fighting. I did not mean civilians, I meant Iraqi troops. So, the insurgents have not killed any innocent civilians intentionally, because if they have, then my original statement would still apply. <
Alright, so then the terrorists showing videos of Iraqis wouldn't be wrong either. Satisfied? If you consider incarcerating a violent insurgent as wrong as beheading an innocent civilian, then I guess it wouldn't be wrong. If you do though, then well... It's bad enough you think killing in self-defense is as wrong as murder (and saying "it's wron
I don't recall anyone saying the Iraqis shouldn't use violence. Reread the phrase. Two wrongs don't make a right. That means that when one wrong is added to another wrong, the outcome cannot be a right. Right. Two wrongs don't make a right, and as you say later, violence is wrong, even if it's Iraqis using it against people that are trying to ki
Did more Americans die after we declared war on Japan, or to the attack on Pearl Harbor?
What's funny is that greggbert won't answer my question, because perhaps he does see that there is a time when killing is necessary, or maybe he too opposed the violent actions taken against Nazi Germany.
You want new enemies? Try the, in your estimate, 20,000 Iraqi insurgents. Try the opinions of the Turks (heavily against the war). Try that the entire world has turned its opinion on us (we, along with England, were the only adamant supporters of the war). I wouldn't count the entire world as our enemies. After all, we've always done things that
My problem is not with videotapes, as I don't see what rights they violate. My problem is with the Republican attempt to justify the violations that have been committed, i.e. torture, prison abuse, etc. You're the one who brought up prison abuse and torture. From what I see, nothing in the original article was justifying torture or prison abuse
There are simply too many better ways of going about ending the violence. Can you give me one of these non-violent solutions? Apparently do wrongs domake a right, just in a different sense of the word. </T
Are you crazy? Then who will do our landscaping work? Who will do the cleaning work? Nobody? So hotels will become dirty, parks will overflow with foilage, and people will not be able to find maids/housekeepers/gardeners. Legal immigrants?
JoeUser Forums