I got rid of that problem. Well. Mmm. How should I say. After not getting any help I have tried rklauncher, which is just great, more responsive, and consumes less resources. And free.
It's spelled Rainlendar. Like the word calendar is spelled as calendar, not calender, as many misspell it.
About #5: I have found that the close button's visibility was set to "show if resizable". Now before setting it correctly, I would have to understand what is the purpose of the "link to button" property, as a couple of buttons are linked to each-other, and if I set the closebutton visibility to always show, hovering it will show the minimize button, which is a strange behaviour, but could be set nicely with aligning the link-to-button and visibili
According to #1, you're right, the settings are there, however the results are the same. But that one is solved by creating a solid bacground. I have registered to skinartistry, but I'd be shy to share my WIP theme without any permissions from the original authors. Is it possible that I send it to you on MSN/googletalk/yahoo? I'm logged in to all of these with GAIM all the time.
Many thanks Night Train! #1 I don't think that there would be transparency settings in the 4.6 WB/Skinstudio version. Or I haven't found them. #2 The system icon is aligned directly left to the middle-aligned titlebar caption text, so it's not there. This is why I thought that maybe in win2k this restore/min/max/close system menu is bound to its original place rather than to the system icon. #3 So if I design a border,
Hi, could you please take a look at the questions I have written and illustrated here: Link ? Basically it's about problems I have on win2k with mac-like (glyph close/min/max buttons on the left side, borderless config, etc) themes. Many thanks Andras
Hi, I have tried to set up virtual desktops on the docked bar without success. Is there a walk-thru / documentation / working example to check what and how should be done? I couldn't even decide whether I need control center or stardock virtual desktops installed for this. Anyway, now I have both, but just can't figure out how to put set up 2-4 virtual desktops that could be switched from the docked bar. Any help is much apprecia
My first thought was something like: Oh why don't they focus on fixing productivity apps? But again if a policy driven application could be done with invisible memory footprint, that would be nice. My policies would be: -no system sounds during audio/video playback -user customizable option to set visible (skinnable of course) remarks instead of system sounds during audio/video playback, or when laptop speaker is disabled -lower vol
My OD+ is a lot smoother since I quit using windowblinds. This is happening on a win2k notebook, 1,5 Ghz Mobile Pentium, 512 RAM, latest win patchlevel, latest OD+. Haven't tried on my XP yet.
Does Stardock reads these topics, or are these intended to get help from the community? How comes that I haven't got a single reply to my questions I have asked hjalf a year ago? I have posted two questions, that can be seen in this IconX section, both having 0 replies.
The same on my PC's. Is it possible that there's a relation between the magnifying effect and the size of the objectdock folder? My one is 727 MB with 5948 files (icons) in 326 folders. This is wehre I keep all my .ico and .png icons.
My tabbed OD+ dock disappeares totally. I'm on a win2k PC, and started to run IconX so that I can get rid of the icon label backgrounds. For those of you not remembering pre-XP desktops, the desktop icon labels have a background, that has the same color as the desktop background color. No problem if you don't use any wallpaper, but if you do, they are simply ugly. Well OK, now that I use IconX, I use its sophisticated features, but anyway,
Google for winplosion, expire, iEX and entbloess. Also for tabexpose in firefox extensions.
WinCustomize Forums
Admin Jafo wrote: Stardock customers ARE benefitting/contributing to the site, but what is needed is the site itself to effectively cover its OWN costs of existence....to make it self-sustaining/perpetuating....independent of and not dependent upon financial support from ANY outside source other than its own members.<
WinCustomize Forums
It's freeloaders like you I can't leave this unanswered. All I'm asking you is to read at least this comment. To start with: According to todays official policies I'm rather an appreciated community
WinCustomize Forums
After all, when you bought WB etc. you bought the program with a number of skins included. Did you really buy unlimited access to more skins or did you buy a program? The skins are free (like in free speech, not in free beer <img src="http://images.stardock.com/wc/smiles/Smile.gif" border=0 ALIGN="abs
WinCustomize Forums
Hi Reppiks, I respect your opinion, but I think you're wrong in a couple of things, maybe the metaphors you have written are just not right. The basic idea - paying some subscription makes you feel member of the community - this is all right. You will pay, hundreds will pay, hundreds will not pay. However my metaphor for this would be that I go to a restaurant, order a decent lunch, eat it, enjoy it, pay for it, and then before le
WinCustomize Forums
The reason why I have purchased Object Desktop (and renewed it) and purchased ObjectDock+ is the fact that I have found wincustomize 2-3 years ago and thought using these skins are fun. As time went by, I only use my own ODP skins, and the 60+ WB skins I had are deleted, having no more than 6 skins (perfect ones BTW) installed. Months go by without anything I'd fancy to download. If wincustomize weren't free, I guess not just a WC subscription, bu
Aye ElindelWolf, of course I don't mind you have deleted my comment. However I didn't meant it to be an insult, rather would've preferred to start a debate or argument. Look what I had in mind: -Someone being in such a fret that opens a forum topic about popups probably after quite awhile after experiencing the first browser popup coudl have saved a lot of time / anger asking about a solution from friends / relatives / mates
I think IconX emulates the desktop. The real desktop is below that. At least this is how I can imagine this. Now your (and my) tabbed dock time to time gets below the IconX desktop. I have reported this to Stardock. Waiting for new releases.
That's easy, as I said, search for *.dbx and *.wab, and _copy_ (don't move, don't move ) everything to the external hard drive.
Hi, I'm not sure that I fully understand your question, but I try to give you some ideas that might be useful at least. If you open Outlook Express, and go to Tools -> Options -> Maintenance tab, press Store Folder button, and you can set where OE will look for the mailbox (hmm I mean the lots of *.dbx files, one for each folder). So if you want to store them on any other drive than C:\ where optimally your OS should sit,
Thx for the answer GreanReaper. I have XP at home, and Win2k in the office on a fairly new HP notebook, that would meet the system requirements. The reason why our (and many other) corporation didn't upgrade from Win2k to XP is that XP does not offer significant benefits in a corporate environment for official work purposes, (they thought I went crazy when I mentioned the nice GUI <img src="http://images.stardock.com/wc/smiles/Smile.gif" bor
Mr XX: even if you have a forum topic in front of you, with 20/50/100 posts? Let's say you want to go to the next page, the page is loaded focusing on its top, the "Next" link is on bottom. C'mon.
Stardock Forums