Should Such Daily Shots Be Allowed?
https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.asp?library=13&SkinID=5919
and tell me whether such content is allowed on WC?
hehe... Well, people should get to enjoy what they like as long as it doesn't harm anyone. I'm glad that there is a lot of diversity here, in humor and politics and art appreciation. It would be a preeeeeety bland world otherwise.
hehe... I think we should celebrate diversity, embrace laughter, and respect one another.
WC is doing fine in all respects.
I got a notice that the message board was down, so I sent another...
And it comes in colors as well! Cool! Uh...I mean...thats terrible!
| and even if it wasn't |
| #35 by Skinner CerebroJD - 9/9/2004 3:58:24 PM and even if it wasn't |
| Any women without a sense of humor have already been offended by the wallpaper I would think. Just harmless fun ladies. Please take it that way. |

| *contemplates submitting hot guy in thong wall and testing that "sense of humo |
| contemplates submitting hot guy in thong wall and testing that "sense of humor |
I'm with paxx on this one. I have an issue with 'anime' depiction of women as the clear intent is to make them 'cute and young'....where the issue is with the depiction of 'young'.
The idea is to show pre-pubescent girls with 'post pubescent' developed body-form, ie, breasts.
This is often 'excused' as a stylistic 'foreign' artform and besides...it's a cartoon.
Fritz The Cat was a cartoon, too.
Several 'anime' images have not made it to public display here as they crossed the line of 'sexual depiction of a minor'.
This one gets though but don't expect that all anime will....

I was wanting to say something about the *It's just a cartoon* statement. This is just a general thought.
As far as I know, any behavior that is considered to be of the porn or soft porn variety in real life is likewise considered to be so when depicted artistically in sketches, cartoon or otherwise. Real model or not.
From memory, this came about because it was recognized that pedophiles would lure their victims with gifts, including cartoonized soft porn. They then would apply peer pressure by proxy (of sorts) by convincing the kids that since their parents let them have cartoon then their parents would not care if they had these special cartoons and since the cartoons were posing or acting certain ways then the kids shouldn't feel funny doing the same thing. It was all ok because it was the cartoons and cartoons were something that the kids were allowed.
I think that this is something to be aware of when evaluating cartoon art. While most of it is OK, some of it has been put to some dirty use.
I am certainly not saying that this particular piece is wrong. I am just suggesting that there is a lot more to this issue in general than one might think, and if some people have qualms about it it they may have reasons that aren't immediatly clear.

| Oh wait!...did I see a hidden message in there somewhere!? And what is she doing with that mouse?!?! Someone call Tipper Gore!! Call Pat Robertson!! Oh my god!!...Impure thoughts impure thoughts!!! I should be flogged!!! |
That pic reminds me of that for some reason...
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.