digital_k digital_k

Micheal Jackson..Your thoughts?

Micheal Jackson..Your thoughts?

Well I am reading on CNN that MJ will be turning himself in tomorow morning(Thursday). I have a relative who's a Sheriff's Deputy and he tells me the raid had to be done because of very substantial evidence,no guessing games at all. Maybe he is guilty, maybe he was the last time. Interesting to see how it will play out. What do you think?
49,420 views 193 replies
Reply #176 Top
"yes as a matter of fact there is a difference in gentics and they have also found a difference in the chemicals produced in the brain. It isn't just a huamn thing either, it is a anmail issue. There have been a number of studies on animals which led to the discoveries in humans supporting the fact that there are actually pre-dispositions of 4 different orientations. Gay, Lesbian, Bi and Straight (always wondered if the use of Straight really ment all others are Bent? )...."

No way, i can't buy that. If that WAS the case the genome would be extinct (think about it). Maybe a mutation, but that numbers of "bent" people are far to high for that. And if it IS the case that your sextuallity is predetermind by your genetic makeup then should Jackson really be charged of anything? If it's such a crime to be anything other than straight, then obviously the only solution to there crime is to inforce sextual genicide!!!

Ho hum...personally, i belive that if what Jackson says about himself is true, he is the purest and honarable person alive. Ofcorse, if it's all lies then he really..i guess..he should get help or something...
Reply #177 Top
anyway....

If Jackson did it, he shouldn't be allowed to live. When someone does such a thing to a child or an adult for that matter, yes men also get raped, something in them is killed by the perp. Something that is never the same ever again in that persons life.

Frankly, I don't care to waste tax money on feeding and helping anyone who does such a thing to a child....

period...

It is not a sickness in my opinion because of the crime over riding any thing anyone could present as being a cause for such a thing. It is a choice, it is also a choice that the person not only makes but has to plan out and take time to set the situation up so they can do the crime.

Premeditation makes it even more of a choice....

Reply #178 Top
But you know what, it doesn't matter. The Church and the Government do not belong in the middle of Adult relationships or in anyones bedroom. People deserve equal rights across the board, period.


Ah but the church should be. It is a moral SIN to be a homosexual.
Reply #179 Top
It is not a sickness in my opinion because of the crime over riding any thing anyone could present as being a cause for such a thing. It is a choice, it is also a choice that the person not only makes but has to plan out and take time to set the situation up so they can do the crime.Premeditation makes it even more of a choice....


Absolutely!

The only tax dollars I am willing to spend on Child Molesters is a quicker method to get them to the 'Electric Chair'.
Reply #180 Top
Ah but the church should be. It is a moral SIN to be a homosexual.

Indeed?
Strange how the large number of child molestation cases involve the so-called 'Men of God'!
"My mother made me a Homosexual."
"If I get her the wool will she make me one too?"



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #181 Top
God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve
Reply #182 Top
Wow...This thread has many topics:

Pedophiles
Homosexuality
Religion

Yikes!

#181 by Kona0197 - 11/25/2003 3:54:20 PM God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve


I guess if you believe that then that was one helluva 'Incestuous' family
Reply #183 Top

Yes...the reason it'd be politic to digress from the 'homosexuality' facet of the discussion is that some have an obscure impression [and wrong] that it is 'learned' not 'inherent through genetic pre-disposition' and such mis-information-fuelled debate would be less than PC and an affront to any of our members that are homosexual.

Call it prejudice or discrimination through ignorance, it's better that if you only 'think' you are an expert to just say nothing. If you are a published geneticist then perhaps you warrant a voice.

The topic of the thread is MJ [Mango Juice], [as distinct from OJ - Orange Juice]....personally I prefer lemons...

MJ is, from simple observation, decidedly 'odd', and much of what he does would strike warning bells in the minds of those responsible for child welfare, whether it be sharing beds, or dangling rug-rats out of windows.....the latter alone 'should' have been sufficient to have his children removed from his control, but, as with all walks of life, money talks....

Reply #184 Top
well I am done debating as i had NO point to make. If MJ is guilty, so be it. If he is not, again, so be it.

See you all in other threads...
Reply #185 Top
God made it all, Kona. Makes it kind of hard to explain away Steve, huh?

Not that homosexuality has a damn thing to do with pedophilia, anyway. There's as many skanky old men trying to pick up little girls in AOL chatrooms as the alternative. They are all scum, regardless. You can make something out of the same-sex thing, but it would still end up the same. One nutty guy with penchant for children.

Do you think people really realize when they go buy his new album that they are actually funding his insanity? I mean, they are actually paying for the carousels, video games and the other 'bait'. Whether you believe this particular instance or not, if you have a reasonable doubt that it *could* be true, can you send the guy money in good concience? Not me. It's akin to conspiracy, imo.



Reply #186 Top
Baker - that's alot to chew. Thanks for that.

If I offended any members with my damn stupid posts, sorry. I will leave my beliefs out of it.
Reply #187 Top
'bait'...yep.
Reply #188 Top
Jafo
I perfer cheese.
Reply #190 Top
Jafo, mmm, I apologize for slipping into the tangent. It was not meant to be disrespectful of you in anyway, nor was it an attempt to highjack the thread. I won't play at giving false witness to any contrived reasonsing on my part for doing so. But it really was not intended to ignore your point to not go in that direction and I will refrain from continuing doing so...

Also attempt to not do so in the future...

really really....

Reply #191 Top
So what is the conclusion of all of this?

I'll admit at first I thought Jackson is giulty... or possibly ALLOT guilty if there is such a delineation.


Now I think he is being railroaded and falsely accused by money thirsty parents willing to put their child in danger to get money.

"Sure you can write poems to my child."

hmmmmmmm.....


[Message Edited]
Reply #192 Top
Jackson needs help... now doubt about that.

No more sleeping with kids please, or strange relationships with children outside of your nuclear family.

I wonder how much attention his own kids are getting if he pays so much attention to other kids?


Rubba rubba.....
Reply #193 Top
Yes...the reason it'd be politic to digress from the 'homosexuality' facet of the discussion is that some have an obscure impression [and wrong] that it is 'learned' not 'inherent through genetic pre-disposition' and such mis-information-fuelled debate would be less than PC and an affront to any of our members that are homosexual.

Right on Jafo.
I find it offensive as Janetta and I have several male and female friends who live different lives to the so-called norm.
All are great company, mostly creative, employed in good jobs and contributing to the variety that is the Australian society .... as distinct from the Rednecks that have a need to use religion as a crutch to quote ill-informed fiction as a means to shore up their own inadequate and humourless little lives.
We appreciate our 'gay' friends AND our 'straight' friends for who they are as 'people', a friend is a friend ..... and real friends are bloody hard to find.



Powered by SkinBrowser!