Ron Polak

Reply to Stardock deception and dishonesty in Stardock Support General Stardock Forums

Neil and Jafo, go to http://sourceforge.net/projects/synergykm and ask them for help. They got it going three years ago.

Reply to Stardock deception and dishonesty in ThinkDesk Stardock Forums

@macaction no argument from me. Problem is Stardock is still publicly promoting "OS X client in development". Despite repeated attempts to get them to just come clean and admint that it's not going to happen, they continue to mislead their loyal customers and treat them with contempt. If you need this functionality, use Synergy.

Reply to Still no OS X functionality? in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

Hope you're not holding your breath for this - or an answer from SD for that matter. Use Synergy and ditch Multiplicity because there will never be a OS X client for it. Stardock doesn't have the balls, nor the respect for the loyalty of it's customers to make it official.

Stardock deception and dishonesty in Stardock Software Stardock Forums

Last Thursday was the fourth anniversary of the start of a thread about Stardock's Multiplicity client for OS X. For four years, Mutiplicity users have been asking for the promised OS X client - supposedly still in development. For four years Stardock's BS artists have been deliberately mislea

Stardock deception and dishonesty in Stardock Support General Stardock Forums

Last Thursday was the fourth anniversary of the start of a thread about Stardock's Multiplicity client for OS X. For four years, Mutiplicity users have been asking for the promised OS X client - supposedly still in development. For four years Stardock's BS artists have been deliberately mislea

Stardock deception and dishonesty in ThinkDesk Stardock Forums

Last Thursday was the fourth anniversary of the start of a thread about Stardock's Multiplicity client for OS X. For four years, Mutiplicity users have been asking for the promised OS X client - supposedly still in development. For four years Stardock's BS artists have been deliberately mislea

Stardock deception and dishonesty in Object Desktop Stardock Forums

Last Thursday was the fourth anniversary of the start of a thread about Stardock's Multiplicity client for OS X. For four years, Mutiplicity users have been asking for the promised OS X client - supposedly still in development. For four years Stardock's BS artists have been deliberately mislea

Reply to OS X Multiplicity in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

Happy anniversary everyone! Last Thursday was the fourth anniversary of the start of this thread. For four years, Mutiplicity users have been asking for the promised OS X client - supposedly still in development. For four years Stardock's BS artists have been deliberate

Reply to Still no OS X functionality? in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

Hey paper bag guy, santa's nearly here and a new year will soon be upon us. WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU PEOPLE DOING ABOUT THE OS X CLIENT??? HOW LONG DO WE HAVE TO WAIT FOR YOU TO RELEASE A TIMEFRAME OR ADMIT IT'S VAPORWARE???

Reply to OS X Multiplicity in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

Well here we are again. Another year nearly gone and still no OS X client for Multiplicity. If there is anyone out there who is fed up with waiting for the OS X client, it's time to make some noise. I'm in Australia which limits the access I have to the people at Stardock. But if your in the US why don't you start hammering SD with phone calls or faxes. Anything to get the message across or at least get them to admit it's vaporware. If the Bangkok airport protestors can force

Reply to Linux?? Oh God please... I'm begging!! in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

> now that progress has been made on the OSX port? What progress?

Reply to What happened to the Multiplicity Forum? in Stardock Support General Stardock Forums

Ok Neil. Where's the forum? And while I'm at it, what's this week's excuse for the non-appearance of the OS X client?

What happened to the Multiplicity Forum? in Stardock Support General Stardock Forums

Looks to me like SD is getting ready to ditch Multiplicity. And I thought only the OS X client was vapourware!

Reply to OS X Multiplicity in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

Scream it from the heavens?? Given the way it's going, I hope you don't mean as a permanent resident [e digicons];)[/e]

Reply to Still no OS X functionality? in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

Juno, Unfortunately your pleas are falling on deaf ears because I believe Stardock have no intention of releasing an OS X client - they just don't have the balls to admit it! I mean just take a look at Seabass's avatar. It's got a paper bag over his head so no-one can recognize him! [e digicons]:D[/e] Use Synergy instead. It works, it's free and IT"S HERE NOW!

Reply to Still no OS X functionality? in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

Whatever

Reply to Still no OS X functionality? in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

ROFL. You people have been shuffling around the truth FOR OVER THREE YEARS! June 22 2005, Neil Banfield said: "The OS X version is still in development and should be in the 1.1 release" June 29, 2005, Brad Wardell said: "Sometime this Summer. " September 22, 2005, Frogboy said: "We're beta testing it internally. " Anyway, IMO your little freudian slip - "No one knows that [U]yet[/U]" - just confirms what I've been saying all along - IT AIN

Reply to Still no OS X functionality? in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

IOW - ain't going to happen!

Reply to Multiplicity for Mac in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

Don't hold your breath. Use Synergy instead.

Waiting for OS X functionality? Sign here. in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

Like many people frequenting this forum, I've been waiting - patiently - for the promised OS X functionality in Multiplicity. It's actually been well over three years since some threads about this software were started and still we seem to be no closer to it's release despite constant new announcements from Stardock about all their other software products. So I call on everyone who's had enough of waiting and excuses to post a reply and let Stardock know how you feel. To Stardock:

Reply to OS X Multiplicity in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

Vista is an OS not a single function utility!! You must be sleeping with someone at Stardock to believe that crap. IMO, the devs working on Multi - as you put it - is 0. Stardock just won't admit it! That's why I'm "pissy".

Reply to OS X Multiplicity in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

I just realised I made a big mistake. The start date for this thread was not June but April 2005 which means that our third anniversary has come and gone without the appropriate acknowledgement. So happy anniversary everyone. :CONGRAT: We're now into our fourth year of waiting!!

Reply to OS X Multiplicity in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

I can't believe what I'm reading. If management is aware of the demand and reading this forum then all I've got to say is you need new management because management is obviously not managing!!! Do you realise that in a little over one month this thread will be THREE YEARS OLD!! In that time we've heard everything from "we're beta testing" to "we're moving" to "we're busy"! That's three years of patient customers asking for more information only to be told to be more patient. Wh

Reply to OS X Multiplicity in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

All you offer us are lame excuses. You're always busy doing something else - moving office; working on other "more important" software releases; transitioning to new OSes, platforms etc etc. When the OS X version of Multiplicity was announced, Vista wasn't even in beta, Panther was the current Mac OS and Apple had just announced they were migrating their hardware to the Intel processor.

Reply to OS X Multiplicity in Multiplicity Stardock Forums

Yeah right!