i agree. i suggest you try winstep's 'nexus dock'. the only limitation is that the multi-docks and subdocks (nice) come prepackaged with the other winextreme programs. otherwise my feeling is that, design wise, it is now currrently superior to object dock.
build a bridge.
heh. reading your.. many posts and frustration regarding object dock reminds me why i no longer subscribe to stardock products incOgnito. i admire your persistence though:)
perhaps this is what shooting in the dark is like. despite evidence to the contrary anything seems possible. or perhaps desperation takes many forms.
nice story. akin to barking at the moon, no?
"That is naive in the extreme. History is made every day. I fail to see how anyone could be so short sighted as to think history stops and starts for perceived events." and perhaps it is equally myopic to assume that the comment could or indeed should only be read literally. language afterall, as this thread would seem to show, is infinitely malleable. think of it as a rhetorical flourish. as an aside could someone tell me how to embed quotations? &nbs
perhaps it is not so much that there will be no answer to that question. but rather, that the question is rapidly about to become irrelevant. the times, as they say, are a-changin'. how does it feel to be a part of history in the making?
'nuance'? in joeuser? now there's a novel idea.
of course generalizations can be deceiving. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/21/eveningnews/realitycheck/main4537739.shtml?tag=rightRail;rightRailInner
hello Sodaiho perhaps the real issue here is one of equitability. Assuming that joe the plummer is a symbolic everyman, do you think there is a case to be made in changing the current taxation system to one that 'spread's the wealth around'? is obama's proposal justifiable? is obama's proposal really more equitable?
amusing post. merci.
persuasively articulated artysim. merci :)
living in one's parent's basement has never been so reviled it would seem.
[quote...it's now time for YOU to move on. Your responses are becoming more pointedly antagonistic. why.. so it is admin jafo. if my replies have been received as antagonistic then it only in response to the narrow minded and bigoted way in which yourself and others have comported yourselves. however i do thank you all for the pleasure of having the opportunity of watching grown men look.. well rather foolish. my frie
At least we both agree I wasn't dazzled. far be it for me to assume your intellectual capabilities bichur. in order to be dazzled one would need to be capable of understanding what exactly it is one is being dazzled by in the first place, non? your own presumptions regarding my intentions h
Those who respect property and property rights will, I trust, 'hope' that what is shared is infact yours to share. how could it not be admin jafo since my reply was in response to cougent's own inquiry as to whether i share my own creative efforts? slugs it would seem are easily confused. <
perhaps if you are so easily baffled bichur it is because at no point in this discussion have i chosen to take a position on the morality of the issue of p2p filesharing. if my response to cougent bespeaks otherwise then you have misunderstood its irony. whatever one feels about the right or wrong of file sharing does not change the pragmatic reality that it is widespread, that it is almost impossible to contain and, as i have repeate
[quoteLastly, would you mind answering a few questions... since you have admitted that the profile info is not you... 1. do you use filesharing to get music, movies, software? information wants to be free cougent - but then you already knew that. 2. are you young? old enough to recognize a room full of moral prigs cougent. 3. do you produce or create any music, movies or software? i'm a student c
why thank you for reposting my reply ka806. since both cougent and admin jafo repeatedly requested the details of an argument that i had previously outlined i thought perhaps it might help to clarify my postion in detail. it is true there is a complexity to its content but then as i have reiterated throughout this discussion that is the very nature of this argument. perhaps if you break it down into single syllables it might help.
Cute, perhaps eloquent but ultimately a personal attack....tempered only by 'perhaps'. no less a personal attack than the quote that it was responding to admin jafo. but then you have consistently presented a one-eyed perspective throughout this discussion. non? your ineptitude in being abl
Oh I know, you have said something, I am just too desnse to understand it. OK, then simplify it for us old thick headed morons and re-state your position. but that would take inclination on my part cougent and what motivation is there to be had in explaining to a man that cannot tell the differe
Yes, it's clearly senility which prevents me from seeing your slant of things... but then i cannot fathom the machinations of a slug either... Come on... we're dying to hear just 'what' you think, rather than simple contradiction of others'. 'an argument is a connected series of statements inten
vasgo kindly read #169, thanks then perhaps you might wish to clarify the details of my 'nick' with those that admin jafo felt he had the right to disclose kona0197. if m
It is presumptuous to ascribe 'complexity' to the abjectly simple just to proclaim a higher sentience. that this is yours and other's experience has been only too well expressed throughout this discussion admin jafo. however the 'complexity' that i so 'presumptuously ascribe', has, unlike your o
The p2p issue has been resolved by the Supreme Court, there is nothing you, me, jafo or anyone here at the forum can say that will change the ruling. Continuance of arguments would be like beating a dead horse. i don't believe i have stated at any time that i disagree with the supreme court decision apocaly
WinCustomize Forums
Stardock Forums
JoeUser Forums