chukkko

Hi, After recent Win11 changes is Start11 a godsend - as i prefer never to combine taskbar buttons (i.e. only one click to switch between windows) and always show text. But if the app has control of the text displayed - it would be really practical if the text was displayed only for some apps - i.e. it is useful for apps with several windows to distinguish quickly between them (e.g. browsers, excel, word) - but for those who only have one window, there is no point in displayin

actually the only effect of hiding text always is that horizontal misalignment disappears - but vertically it stays the same (easily visible when togle hide always several times - there is no vertical movement (but i had to create 20 new windows because without text i would not fill 4 rows so even without text, there is a same shift in the bottom edge of current window indicator: 1 row (scrolled to the top): <img src="https://cdn.stardock.us/forums/73/40/7340889/b72

I keep Win11 up to date - Windows 23H2 (OS Build 22631.3296). Start11 2.07 (upgraded just yesterday - was behaving the same in 1.5 too). My resolution is 1920x1200. I use scale 150% for fonts due to weaker eyesight - i would bet this is the rare factor that causes this. Interestingly - it is not just 4 rows, as when i opened winver, it looked like this: </p

Could it be maybe related to the fact that you have no labels and i do?

Hi, I hate combining icons so my setting is never combine. As a result i have quite a lot of icons and i mostly need 3-4 rows if icons. I noticed that active window indicator is calculated a bit off - the more rows i have, the more off the screen indicator gets. With 3 rows it is still visible but just barely. With 4 rows it is gone completely. One row: <p

I have now installed Start11 v2 - and it behaves in a weird way. I started unpinning all those duplicate icons and i noticed that Unpin actually removed both the original small one and the duplicate big icon. That also looks like a defect. This is the screenshot before installing v2 (duplicates untouched from before). v2 install didnt create any new duplicates (but reset all my settings without warning). <img src="https://cdn.stardock.us/forums/73/40/7340889/5e272f2b-d

[quote who="Neil Banfield" reply="7" id="3920852"] I think this thread may have gone off on a tangent here. Start11 will only sync pins in response to a pin operation in the OS and will only sync items that were in the list earlier and now are not (thus deleting) or are in the list now but were not before (thus adding). It does not import the entire thing at that time. The only other time Start11 will import things is when first run when it will import the ent

Sure, but checking if the pin destination already exists is trivial - if you are creating the pin when syncing, you surely have the app destination and icon. That would achieve at least one off the app duplicate pins being kept in sync. - which is still better than current situation. Without that sync does not make sense at all (and should not be called sync at all - as that is what sync means - duplicate change on either side to the other side). Without that the "sync" function is more hassl

Hi, Thanks for the suggestion - but thats not what i want. When i install Start11 - i want all my old tiles to still be there in Start11 - thus i want to keep the sync on. Also - in some situations only the "Pin to start" option is available - thus if i want to avoid recreating all those icons in Start11 manually, i need to keep the sync on as i do want to both to be always in Sync (actually i didnt check - but i do expect the sync to work both ways). The issue is that i someh

Hi, Just got a notice that there is a new version of Start11 - got it installed but now many apps are present in the Start menu twice (see screenshot). All my previous app icons are on the left (resized to small) - all the duplicates are in size medium (which is quite annoying - please find a way to configure the default icon size in the start menu). Windows 11 version: 23H2 OS Build 22631.3007 Start11 version: 1.5.0.1 My guess would be that the fact that no