PurpleHel

PurpleHel

Joined Member # 6230539
1 Posts 4 Replies 71 Reputation

[quote who="Uvah" reply="5" id="3499195"]their native resolution, so a 2000x2000 image, for example, loses nearly half the picture.[/quote] Not sure what your point is. That was describing how the windowblinds 'smart' is displaying. The desired functionality is Windows' 'Fit', where the proportions of the image are kept, while shrinking or expanding it to fill the screen without getting cut off. (I was mistaken earlier when I said 'Fit' doesn't change s

8 Replies 3,075 Views

[quote who="BigDogBigFeet" reply="6" id="3499216"]Doesn't stretch in Windowblinds work as you want... shrinking the larger image to "Fit" your screen resolution? That's what I recall it did.[/quote] It does, but it skews the proportions of the image as well. Windows 'Fit' keeps the proportions of the image, and simply makes it fill as much of the screen as it can without any getting cut off.

8 Replies 3,075 Views

[quote who="Uvah" reply="3" id="3499168"]A 'fit' will only display what your native resolution will hold. [/quote] That's absolutely not how the 'Fit' Option in the native windows wallpaper selection works. It displays the whole image, either at the native resolution if said resolution is smaller than your display, or shrunken to *fit* your display if the image resolution is larger than your display resolution. Iirc, it has worked thusly since Win 95.</p

8 Replies 3,075 Views

Some are jpg, some are png. I can't find settings for the wallpaper beyond the pretty basic "Smart, stretch, tile, center". I'm using the Win 8 by Stardock skin.

8 Replies 3,075 Views

I've got WindowBlinds 8.06 (029 x64 Windows 8 Edition). I have a number of wallpapers that are larger than my 1920x1080 screen resolution. Windows native wallpaper display deals with these just fine when set to 'Fit'. Windowsblinds doesn't seem to have a setting that can deal with these tho. 'Smart' results in the wallpapers being displayed at, as far as I can tell, their native resolution, so a 2000x2000 image, for example, loses nearly half the picture. That doesn&#3

8 Replies 3,075 Views