Xan

Xan

Joined Last seen Member # 513411
33 Posts 407 Replies 15,576 Reputation

As for the forums, they're a big part of why I bought the game. And they're slow, buggy, user-hostile, and frequently down. Like I wrote about, I expect better. Like what? Civilization4.com's forums? Do they have forums? I can't even go on there because the site says I don't have Flash installed even

49 Replies 36,352 Views

So what strategy game AI do you find sufficient? If GalCiv II's isn't good enough for you, then what is? When people speak highly of the computer AI, they speak of how good it is compared to other games. I can't think of another game that is even remotely close. Why not simply turn up the difficulty level? And I hope this doesn't sound rude but complaining about the forums seems petty and has nothing to do with the g

49 Replies 36,352 Views

Thanks all for the tips and cyber next time please try not to be a lets see how im gonna treat this guy person, forums are made for helping people out You didn't ask for help though. You came on and claimed the game was "cheating completely" A very serious accusation on a game that is well known for

34 Replies 32,389 Views

Master of Orion 2 fans.Galactic Civilization 2 fans.You might be interested in the upcoming Space Empires 5 scheduled for release in stores and online in June 2006.(www.malfador.com)Malfador company is well known for the previous Space Empire titles bought online.Also renowned for continuing tech supprt/patches and unhinderd "mod

51 Replies 135,440 Views

There's only one killer flaw in the SE games that always put it in a class below GalCiv for me - it's virtually impossible to lose. The game's AI is so weak as to be non functional. It's easy to have lots of options and "depth" if you don't have to bother making a computer AI that makes use of them. SE 4 just wasn't challenging in the slightest and I don't consider myself a very great strategist.

11 Replies 35,785 Views

WTF_Chuck, sorry but you're just one of those miserable people who make nice forum communities suck for everyone. You really think 3 out of 4 people who played GalCiv 2 had a bad experience? You're insane.

49 Replies 36,422 Views

Tough is just the difficulty level where the AIs are set to intelligent. Tough means they're playing at the same level. This is the equiv of "Noble" in Civ IV. It's worth noting that the "fair" AI in Civ IV stops at the 4th level whereas in GalCiv its equal level is the 6th level. Most seasoned Civ 4 vets play at Prince or Monarch for a challenge (two levels above the fair level in Civ IV) and that's after 5 months of patches.

12 Replies 14,434 Views

Loudness of the few doesn't equate to largeness in numbers. I've seen a few people post over and over and over demanding the feature. Civ IV has multiplayer, hard to find people to play on Gamespy.

10 Replies 6,519 Views

was just saying that big brand-names get flamed down real quick when they release a very buggy game - though they still sale. Stardock's saving grace is that they are an indie developper who have a great fanbase supporting them and spreading around the word and also their customer service/dedication to patching it up real fast. I unders

41 Replies 29,180 Views

I would like to see Stardock better staff a QA department, though; even if that means simply paying several high school kids minimum wage to play games. SD's response time/support is good, but the frequency & severity of bugs is abnormally large for a mainstream commercial product. It's like we're the QA department. LOL. What mainstream game h

22 Replies 30,559 Views

I totally don't agree with you. It's my game. I want to be able to play it as I like. I hated the fact Civ IV restricted how I could play the game. I agree the AI should be more careful but so far from what I've seein in 1.0X they've taken care of this. I support having an OPTION to eliminate tech trading. But I don't support crippling it like they did in Civ IV.

144 Replies 67,482 Views