I have an 'auto-complete list' and basic function 'help tooltip' mechanisms working nicely. The current code highlighting is just the default Visual Basic support in the control, but adding more won't be very hard at all. The 'window' is just a bunch of DesktopX objects and graphics, no animations but the buttons etc. all do what they are supposed to. Interestingly the ActiveX control I've used has many functions I can't make use of as
Skarny
I have an onscreen indicator when my cap-lock is accidentally on. IT LOOKS LIKE THIS. :-P
Did anyone ever like http://www.virtualplastic.net/ ? It used to be one of my faves - still up, but no activity - but it was a very interesting read (regarding all it's win9x customization info) at the time.
Cool Liz! You're taken care of then :-)
At the moment I think the hardest thing for me to do will be 'code block collapsing' that notepad++ does. Notepad++ would have been my first choice for making a customized editor - but I'm not clever enough to work out how to do it.. This will be better though because I can deliberately interact with the theme directory and the objects within DesktopX as the editor will run as a desktopX object itself :-) Gives me some ideas which would have been too difficult or impo
DesktopX Developers You might be perfectly happy with the one built into DesktopX, but I'm going to have a go at making my own anyway. Any suggestions for features of what your ideal DX script editor would have?
[e digicons]:waaaa:[/e] ... [e digicons]:waaaa:[/e]
The uninstall feature. LOL joking joking! I'm really liking the auto fade on inactive windows after a period of time.
Am I right? Would anyone from Stardock be willing to send me any documentation they may have or have worked out and I'll use the freeware version (which you may be using anyway) of the control to make a code editor for DesktopX with extra features if I can.
Yes, bit tricky because of how DesktopX behaves seems it can be picked up as a 'bad egg'. It would be nice if it didn't get picked up by Norton though - lots of people do use Norton's bloatware.
OMG. I feel like I've just kicked the cutest puppy on earth. It's a puppy with fleas..but that doesn't make it right to kick it. I still love you DesktopX and lots more people should. [e digicons]:dog:[/e] [e digicons]
I'm pretty happy with it RND ;-) Most times it's what I'm doing to it that makes it unstable for me. But yes...not the best descriptive word. I should have perhaps said '...good to work with something consistent ...'. Consistently broken maybe? ;-P
Cool, because what I am doing exploits some behaviours of DesktopX. If they change in the future I'll just adapt, but good to work with something stable (not that I don't want DesktopX to get more work done on it!) :-) Thanks Zubaz
I may be dumb, but I couldn't see how to search *just* the DesktopX Object gallery as it doesn't appear in the 'featured galleries' list when you use the search box/options. So I looked at the URL wincustomize uses to search other galleries and found I could just tweak the URL to limit the search to DesktopX objects. template: https://www.wincustomize.com/explore/[gallery name]/search/[search word] Replace the [gallery name] and [search word] with what
I'm just about to embark on a project with sViz. Any chance DesktopX is going to change in the next couple of months or has an upcoming features list?
Wow, you guys are totally behind using Windows 7, that's 91 versions behind me! I've been using Windows 98 for ages, haven't seen a reason yet to update to Windows 2000, waiting for Windows 2013.
The bottom on our Kingswood had rusted out at the back. Our seatbelts were all the separated us from the whizzing road. Wish it wasn't the case, but we disposed of a lot of wrappers, paddle pop sticks, etc. via the road disposal unit beneath our feet.
Thanks, that was entertaining, interesting, and somewhat successful. I feel a little dirty now, better go shower. [e digicons]*_*[/e]
It's all about the sex isn't it :-P But no wonder there are people hungry for love. What is it anyway? What is it I *am* asking for? [e digicons]:wc:[/e] (oh and: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWavPYztKwE )
All good suggestions so far - any more? :-P
How do I get some? :-)
Neil: I have a tra and ttt using the particle engines. I have set 4, and defined 4 ParticleEngine1,2,4 sections in the tra and 4 EMITT opcodes in the ttt, one each for 0,1,2 and 3. Engines 2 and 3 don't seem to render.
Neil: I have a tra and ttt using the particle engines. I have set 4, and defined 4 ParticleEngine1,2,4 sections in the tra and 4 EMITT opcodes in the ttt, one each for 0,1,2 and 3. Engines 2 and 3 don't seem to render.
I kind of don't want people to know how to reverse engineer a gadget....maybe if they deal directly with Stardock and show the gadget is their own IP maybe...