Tamren

Had someone else upload for me and it worked. Some of the newer posts still don't list an avatar but the older posts in the EWoM forums all have the new fire crystal image. I figure that will fix itself with time. Thanks for the help guys.

IE7 doesn't work for me. And my Linux machine can't run IE. I suppose all I can do now is get a friend or mod to do it. [e digicons]>_>[/e] This is the avatar I am trying to upload btw. In case there is anything wrong with it. http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/3941/elementalcrystalfireli6.png

The upload link on wincustomize does work but it would not let me upload the 100X100 medallion avatar from the Elemental forums. It said the upload suceeded but the file got corrupted and the max size was 50X50. So I tried uploading a tiny test picture and it worked. So I went back over to the elemental forum and tried to upload the medallion there. Again the remove button got rid of the old avatar without problems but then the upload button still doesn't work properly.

Tried again with the linux computer, no luck. The second attempt jumped from 48% to 100% then froze again. The upload is complete but evidently whatever stores the file is away or sleeping. I tried multiple Stardock forums with the same result. I left it alone at 100% for 10 minutes this time, no luck. If no one else has trouble then the problem could be on my side of the connection but I can't imagine what the problem could be. These computers use Flash 9 and 10, but I heard that onl

Hi guys, recently there were some new pictures posted in the Elemental forums. I tried to update my old crystal avatar with the new picture of the fire crystal but I ran into some problems. In the account page the "remove" button worked fine and dumped my old avatar. However clicking on the "upload" button does nothing. I was told that the forums have trouble with Flash 10 which I am currently using. So I fired up my linux computer which uses older firefox 2 and an older version of fl

Please stop perpetuating the blind hysteria. The Securom in Sacred 2 does not use a rootkit. Unlike say, Daemon Tools. So you won't purchase Sacred 2 from Impulse because Stardock informed you up front about the DRM? Perfectly fair. But given that you now will never purchase the game from anywhere else, how is Stardock at fault here? Stardock can not force other companies to follow the bill of rights, they can only lead by example.

Stardock really has things going in the right direction. What we need is games that do not ship or install with DRM in them. The key to the system is that if you want patches that add content to the game, install expansions to it, or access any multiplayer component, then you need to buy a copy and register it to your identity. Patches that affect stability would be free to use for everyone and would be discontinued after the game is considered "stable" because people who pirate your

If you like games of this sort then you might want to check out the X franchise. The current iteration is X3-Terran Conflict. However the developers do warn people that its not for everyone. The only way I can describe the gameplay is singleplayer EVE online.

Hey guess what. Stardock warned you that Age of Booty had SecuROM included. Doesn't that make you happy? Consider that neither the Age of Booty website or Direct2Drive mention the copy protection. What that means is that the people who run the Impulse service refuse to sell you a game that s omeone else made under false pretenses by lying to you about what is i ncluded in the software . Unlike ev