I think I got lucky. I'm probably about a 6 for beauty (I'm no Brad Pitt/Tom Cruise, but not far off from, say, Keifer Sutherland), and about an 8 in brains. Of course, the beauty's dropping as my metabolism slows down... I'd probably swap them if I could, though. There's no doubt that beautiful people usually have better lives and an easier time of things. Of course, that could be the "grass is greener on the other side" syndrome. Really, though, if I could pick something to p
misterME
One of the most interesting takes on it I've ever seen came from a movie: You go to this pretty little place where you're forced to sit and watch hours of videotape of yourself and defend questionable decisions you made thoughout your life. At night, you can go out dancing and eat all you want without gaining an ounce or feeling stuffed. There's even a past-lives pavillion where you can see who you were in a former life. Antway, I always thought that was neat. (Can't remember the name of the mov
BoR65, WinXP will likely solve most of your problem. The issue lies in that WinME manages memory poorly. Regardless of how much RAM you have, your "resources" will still drop at the same rate, since that term refers to your System and GDI heaps, not your RAM (per se). The quickest and easiest way to solve this problem is to limit the number of extraneous (and often useless) programs that start up as Windows starts and then run in the background, doing essentially nothing. <
Hehe. Then, uh, delete mine too. It looks like I'm talking to myself. (j/k)
Oh, and Ron, please watch the language. Such profanity is not welcome here.
Hey Ron: To answer your question, absolutley nothing. But this is a *community* site. And any community worth its salt will generally not be so limited in scope as to exclude or ignore major world happenings.
Gorman, Brad (FrogBoy) has stated that the site is certainly *not* profitable in and of itself. I'm sure if the XP revolution is accompanied by a huge increase in sales for Stardock (which is entirely possible), the grant of bandwidth to WC will rise in accordance. But the traffic that is being curtailed is for people coming to the site to take and take with nothing to give back. That traffic will likely soon rise as well. To keep the site from slowing to a crawl, some
I think the rise in the number of unique vsitors to this site is a testimony to the rise in interest that XP is generating for skinning. And the damn software hasn't even hit the shelves yet! Once it does, I *do* think that the numbers will rise at an even higher rate. In previous version of Windows, the intro movie that new users were greeted with didn't hype the fact that you could change your color scheme; XP's intro movie *does* hype the fact that XP is skinnable (I forget whether o
I think friendship, as mentioned above, is paramount. But that's too broad and doesn't really define anything. My grilfriend and I have been dating for about 3 years. We moved in together after knowing each other for about 2 weeks. Recently, we sort of broke up, and she moved out (and away, 120 miles to the east). Now we're merely dating each other, and suddenly our relationship seems much stronger. Analyzing this in the way I always do, I come to the following conclusions: We
Gorman, >> Also, you need to figure that many people here are customers of yours, and this basically comes as an extra feature to them. That'll be figured in. If someone has purchased ODN or a Stardock app, then they're in the SD "database" and won't be affected by the download limit, if I'm reading it correctly. So, in *that* light, this site will continue to provide the bandwidth to all SD customers. It will just no longer cater without limits to those who have no
Hehe. Maybe I should've defined "resource" a little more clearly. I meant: "a template or resource file that includes the new tags/sections/arguments for skinning things unique to WinXP", not "is there a program that will do this for me?" Thanks. I'll check out the XPcopper stuff and look for clues there.
I'm sure this has been discussed on here, but I missed it apparently.... Is there a resource for creating skins using the new UIS3 skin format? I know it won't ship until later, assumedly with WB3.1, but I'd like to go ahead and start getting my feet wet with it. And is UIS3 required to skin things like the new XP Taskbar an Start Menu/Panel? Or can that be done now?
Maybe that's the problem. Some of the skins I've been trying might not have full support for *every* element, and I'm probably seeing that more obviously in contrast to the native Luna themes. One thing I've noticed with every WB skin, however, is that it still seems to be unable to skin scrollbars on certain apps. This is most evident in IE 6, OE 6, and the left pane of Explorer windows (the task pane). XP's Luna skins all of these, but even new WB skins, like Apartment, don't. I know
I've been a big fan of WindowBlinds since 1.7 (when I found it...). However, since upgrading to Windows XP, I've been more than content with the Olive flavour of the default Luna theme that ships with it. I've installed the latest beta for WindowBlindsXP (which, as I understand it, will eventually be called WB3). What I've found is that even my favourite skins, and even some of the awesome new ones by essorant and the like, simply don't skin well in XP; there are too many holes in the s
Well said, Elf. I work in a retail environment. Here in Columbia, there is quite a large number of Pakistani and Afgani immigrants. It is horrible to watch people's reactions to these *American citizens* when they walk into our store. I'm a technician/installer, not a salesman, but I find myself going up to these people and initiating conversations because *no one else will*! I would dare to say this attack managed to greatly accelerate the hatreds and prejudices arlre
I'd make several warnings here: First, we need to be very careful in replacing "non-compliant" gevernments with new ones which better suit our tastes. We've done that before, only to have it backfire on us (Iran/Iraq, various nations in Central America). And don't think for one minute that the Japanese situation is peachy and resolved. Sure, their culture has adapted and absorbed many of the Western pastimes and such, but their ideals are still very foriegn to Western thinking. And
Man, someone really should consider hacking this thread out. I mean, I see the points on both sides, but it's getting really hostile. Why don't we just let this one lie or get rid of it altogether. Just my $0.02
Well, the obvious solution to the failure of the current internet advertising model would seem to be sponsorship. WinCustomize makes it, through sponsorship from Stardock, and through low-key (and nice) merchandising, or so we assume. So my question is this: *IS* WinCustomize managing to stay afloat? We see bandwisth usage reports, but not financial statements (which is fine; I don't really *want* to see financial statements). Between the sponsorship from Stardock and the CD/T-shirt/hat
I spent about a year interning (er, assisting, as it was only a one-man operation besides myself) at a local BBS in Charleston, SC dedicated to local Star Trek fans. (Yeah, so I was a geek; what of it?). I had no idea what I was doing; I just pressed whatever buttons and typed whatever lines I was told to by my [boss] (who looked amazingly like Santa Claus). There was no pay involved. A year or so later I got my first PC, with a fresh copy of the revolutionary Windows 95, and started us
"I thought this thread was dead!?" "Eet goat bettah..."
Really? That's great! I'm glad to see that the new drivers will fix some of the old WB/DX/FX problems. I've had WinFX and some of the DX/WB features disabled on my PC for awhile due to weirdness with the 12.41 drivers. I haven't tried my 14.70 drivers with the OD stuff yet. Anyone know how stable the 14.70 drivers are on WinXP RC1, most especially in how well they handle the OD stuff? (If it matters, I have a GeForce2 64MB Pro card)
Whoa, Fa. Step back. First, I don't think I'm alone when I say that you need to watch your language. Someone on here once got warned over using the word "crap"; you took it a step even further. Second, While I obiously agree with Hoverboy on this issue, that doesn't color the fact that your last post was uncalled for. You're definitely crossing the bounds of a logical and frieindly discussion. I fail to see how his being a fan of WinXP suddenly means he doesn't give a %$*&. You
rolf & such
Yeah. That would be awesome. Make my life a touch easier.
I think I'll have to agree that you're letting your opinion of MS as a monopolistic company (a sentiment I agree with, btw) color your opinion of their OS. That's certainly your right, though I think you'll miss out in the long run because of that attitude. WinXP is just Win2k with better compatibility, better driver support, a more polished (and optional) interface, wizards to assist those that need it with common tasks (you *can* still do practically everything the old-fashioned way,