Frogboy Frogboy

Are people looking for communities? Or Gangs?

Are people looking for communities? Or Gangs?

There is often a fine line between a "community" and a gang. Some people don't recognize the difference. But there is.

A gang is a self selected group of like minded people who provide unconditional support of one another and consider even relatively minor resistance to their opinions as a great affront that must be attacked.

A gang considers gentle and tolerant behavior between members of the gang but treatment of outsiders can be very nasty, even violent.

The recent melodrama that we saw on the message boards is something that at first looks like just another flamewar.  But looking back on it, what we really have is a confusion between what is a community and what is a gang.

For example, in this recent incident, 3 users, Lady Akasha, Apocalypse67 (to a far lesser extent), and Green Armani, were disgruntled by things they saw on the message boards. Specific behaviors that they considered "unfriendly". But how do you define unfriendly behavior? Well, it seems having looked over their posts, unfriendly behavior is any behavior that disagrees with their points of view.

For instance, in one thread which was yet another complaint about the wallpaper section that, like so many, quickly had one side making baseless accusations against the moderators which eventually got me involved. I said essnetially "I don't care about the wallpaper section. I could care less if any more wallpapers were uploaded." The point of my message was that wallpaper authors do not hold a special leverage. The way we run the wallpaper section is "as-is". Polite discussions on changes are welcomed but threats and peole taking their walls and going are not going to work.

Wallpapers on WinCustomize get more downloads than wallpapers on any other site on the Internet. So we feel justified in the way we run the wallpaper section. I.e. we must be doing something right.

But the response to this was anger and 2 people taking their walls and going because of feeling "insulted". WC was clearly not a "friendly" place.  We don't show "respect" to people here.

All of these words turn out to be code-words for "agreeing with me unconditionally".

All 3 users went to deviantART and proceeded to not just attack WinCustomize in their journals but personally attack the users here and myself specifically with name-calling and the what-not. 

You can see this here:
http://greenarmani.deviantart.com
http://lady-akasha.deviantart.com
http://apocalypse67.deviantart.com

In the Devious comments you can see Lady Akasha and Green Armani saying all kinds of vile things. And yet at the same time, are "disgusted" at the people here and myself in particular. consider that for a moment. I don't recall anyone treating them anywhere nearly as nastily as they are posting over at dA about other people.

In one good example, Green Armani had a problem logging on for some reason. No one had done anything to him. It happens sometimes (not often but it's happened to me too). His first thought was that we had deleted his account for having a differing point of view. He went as far as to imply that the admins of this site are similar to the Nazis and others who would silence dissenters. Except that we had done no such thing. When he managed to log on, several minutes later, no formal apology. Only complaints that he no longer had elite access (which you'll find in every case that these people feel they are entitled to).

But in all of this, the charge is that there is no community here. They're wrong. What we don't encourage here are gangs.  Instead, we value honesty, integrity, objectivity, trust, and fairness. These are the cornerstones of a healthy community. But it's not a gang.

Every once in awhile a community site will find gangs form in their midsts. That is, in my opinion, what we just witnessed.  Such gangs try to impose their views on others and consider any resistance as something to be crushed. the ultimtate code of the gang is that members of the gang are treated with kindness and those outside the gang are treated with utter ruthlessness.

And from reading their posts both here and elsewhere, the ruthlessness and meaness of their personalities has really shown that they don't understand the difference between a community and a gang.

33,313 views 135 replies
Reply #126 Top
I'll probably get flamed for this, (famous last words) but, just how mature was it in the first place for Frogboy to post this publicly on Wincustomize when it could have been handled privately between the people who left and Frogboy himself?

People keep on talking about things being handled privately, this itself should have been one of those things.

Honestly, it would have been fine just keeping to the "gangs or communities" argument, but did direct links to people making comments and turning the thread into a personal vendetta against them have to happen? Or was this thread an open invite attack knowing that WC users would probably go and flame them in support of Stardock?

Please don't take this as me attacking anyone, it honestly isn't, its just an observation and I very well could be wrong in the origional intent of the post itself and am reading too much into it, but someone has to bring up all sides of it don't they?

And I apologize for not getting you links to the lack of help Brad, I'll hit that up if I have time later...

(disclaimer: I do NOT support any parties here or their arguments of either side, this was meant to give people something to think about and come to their own conclusions on a thought process about this whole thing.)
Reply #127 Top
*changes channel*
*re-run*
*sigh*
*changes channel*



Reply #128 Top
HI BStreet!

Good to see you here..again
stay awhile.



[Message Edited]
Reply #130 Top
You know, the funny thing about Bakerstreet and I is that we have debated very harshly in the past yet we share almost identical views on...well almost everything.

I've lurked and read some of the things Bakerstreet has written and thought "I wonder if anyone thinks *I* am Bakerstreet." Yet we've had these really big debates too.



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #131 Top
I miss Bakerstreet. He has a "way with words" that is quite entertaining.
Reply #132 Top
agreed....I would have loved to see some of his sartorial quips in some of the recent threads



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #133 Top
agreed....I would have loved to see some of his sartorial quips in some of the recent threads


He makes fashion statements? How does he know what I'm wearing? I'm getting very paranoid here....
Reply #134 Top
bakerstreet is a fashion statement



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #135 Top
bakerstreet is annoying - the more you read what he says the more you find yourself agreeing with him.

Come back soon, your absence leaves a big hole in this messageboard.