GeneralEtrius GeneralEtrius

You're Banned!: The Forum Game

▼

You're Banned!: The Forum Game

from GalCiv2 Forums

Okay, here's what you do for this game: You have to "ban" the person who posted above you for an outrageous, silly, or funny reason. Got it?

off-topic
6,376,634 views 41,551 replies +16 Loading…
Reply #26751 from Sins Forums Top

I never assumed that they had "social issues" in a clinical sense. Internalizing oppressive mindsets is a common social/psychological behavior like cognitive dissonance or memory fabrication that a great number of people will do if confronted with a certain (usually not at all traumatic) situation, not a diagnosable pathology.
End of quote

Banned for this is what I call Delibird sentence. In that it looked promising and intelligent, but in the end it said nothing

Reply #26752 from Sins Forums Top

banned for pointing out truth.

SD: You look at these chicks and think of such psychological conditions. There's association there, which is basically subconscious assumption.

Sins of a Solar Empire II
Reply #26753 from Demigod Forums Top

Quoting Syneptus, reply 26736
Banned for don't listen to them!

It looks fine...
End of Syneptus's quote

I know right? |-)

Quoting Syneptus, reply 26736

I have 0 viruses! I finally reinstalled my OS! Thanks for your help Morpheas...
End of Syneptus's quote

Huh? What help? :|

Quoting Altaux, reply 26737
Banned for sending thanks to a computer expert. Arhg politeness for the win
End of Altaux's quote

Banned for not accepting my expertise :P

Quoting heft, reply 26743
Banned for joining the band of the banned
End of heft's quote

LOL, catchy XD

Quoting Draakjacht, reply 26746
Morph: I would advise against the new keyboard. It's nice, but you have what you need.
End of Draakjacht's quote

I know, I know :\ I definitely dont need it, since I already have 2 great keyboards.

Buying keyboards and MP3 players is my thing. I cant resist! :D

Quoting Draakjacht, reply 26746
And most of them are too flat chested for me, but I did know one my senior year that had hugely delicious boobies.
End of Draakjacht's quote

What did she look like? ;P

Quoting Draakjacht, reply 26746
Between that and her ability to get her leg behind her head, I would do her.
End of Draakjacht's quote

Now thats just insensitive. Shame on you! :grin:

You could say "make love to her" :troll:

Quoting Wizard1956, reply 26747
Banned for being in the same tree as all the other nuts.
End of Wizard1956's quote

Banned for being the tree that holds all the nuts together :P

Quoting Scoutdog, reply 26750
Internalizing oppressive mindsets is a common social/psychological behavior like cognitive dissonance or memory fabrication that a great number of people will do if confronted with a certain (usually not at all traumatic) situation, not a diagnosable pathology.
End of Scoutdog's quote

Wait a sec....are you a computer program from the Matrix? :| You're one of us! :D

"Cute Pokemon always get Parahax!"

Reply #26754 from Demigod Forums Top

Quoting Altaux, reply 26751

that try to full to fool a man he grew up doing agricultural science
End of Altaux's quote

Banned for fail.

Quoting Altaux, reply 26752
Banned for starting a page.
 
End of Altaux's quote

Banned for banning yourself.

Quoting Altaux, reply 26753

Banned for this is what I call Delibird sentence. In that it looked promising and intelligent, but in the end it said nothing
End of Altaux's quote

Banned for triple posting, and speaking the truth.

Quoting Draakjacht, reply 26754
SD: You look at these chicks and think of such psychological conditions. There's association there, which is basically subconscious assumption.
End of Draakjacht's quote

Wait a sec...you havent realized yet that SD has no idea what he's talking about?? :|

"Cute Pokemon always get Parahax!"

Reply #26755 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Banned for long posts. Compensating for something?

SD: You look at these chicks and think of such psychological conditions. There's association there, which is basically subconscious assumption.
End of quote
Yes and no. While on a certain level I think anyone who dresses like that has to be nuts (not to mention their giggling sounds like the manic laughter of a guy with a gun in a public place), the sort of behavior I'm talking about is really more social/societal than purely psychological- an illness of society as opposed to an illness of the mind. My basic point (in clearer, but somewhat stronger terms) is that these girls have had their initiative and aggression beaten down so thoroughly by American society's rather restrictive gender system that they repress those behaviors and wind up stupid, shallow, naive, and childlike. Now, the important thing is that I used this phenomenon more as an example- I was not trying to say that all cheerleaders are products of this system, but that they usually act like they are, and I find that behavior quite repulsive.

Reply #26756 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for fail.
End of quote

lol Banned for  fixed it thanks:thumbsup:

Reply #26757 from Sins Forums Top

Yes and no. While on a certain level I think anyone who dresses like that has to be nuts (not to mention their giggling sounds like the manic laughter of a guy with a gun in a public place), the sort of behavior I'm talking about is really more social/societal than purely psychological- an illness of society as opposed to an illness of the mind. My basic point (in clearer, but somewhat stronger terms) is that these girls have had their initiative and aggression beaten down so thoroughly by American society's rather restrictive gender system that they repress those behaviors and wind up stupid, shallow, naive, and childlike. Now, the important thing is that I used this phenomenon more as an example- I was not trying to say that all cheerleaders are products of this system, but that they usually act like they are, and I find that behavior quite repulsive.
End of quote

Banned for this time you said something. However, I would like to say something. In terms of hating them wearing skimpy clothes i can understand that. However, to look down on them for being happy doing what they do is something I never understood about people. People always say arrggh sexist this and society that, but in my mind it comes down to the individual. If some one has fun doing cheerleading and is naturally giggly(ie is not acting that) I respect it(especially becuase it takes time and dedication to do those things.)

So to break the most ridiculous things you said into points

1)Stupid; not all of us can be schloars I rather they cheerlead than they work at the powerplant

2) shallow; depth is something I try not look for in others, cause all it causes is what i can call the barrel of water phenomena. whereby when looking directly over a barrel you can never tell how deep it is.

3)same as depth, how do you judge it?

Reply #26758 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Banned for too many words...

Reply #26759 from Demigod Forums Top

Banned for no words.

Quoting Scoutdog, reply 26757
Banned for long posts. Compensating for something?
End of Scoutdog's quote

Yes. My absence, obviously >_>

Quoting Scoutdog, reply 26757
Yes and no. While on a certain level I think anyone who dresses like that has to be nuts (not to mention their giggling sounds like the manic laughter of a guy with a gun in a public place), the sort of behavior I'm talking about is really more social/societal than purely psychological- an illness of society as opposed to an illness of the mind. My basic point (in clearer, but somewhat stronger terms) is that these girls have had their initiative and aggression beaten down so thoroughly by American society's rather restrictive gender system that they repress those behaviors and wind up stupid, shallow, naive, and childlike. Now, the important thing is that I used this phenomenon more as an example- I was not trying to say that all cheerleaders are products of this system, but that they usually act like they are, and I find that behavior quite repulsive.
End of Scoutdog's quote

Blah blah blah, a whole bunch of bullshit. Just say what you want to say SD, and spare us the crazy talk :typo:

Quoting Scoutdog, reply 26757
While on a certain level I think anyone who dresses like that has to be nuts (not to mention their giggling sounds like the manic laughter of a guy with a gun in a public place),
End of Scoutdog's quote

1. Ok, what the hell does a laughing maniac with a gun threatening people have to do with giggling girls? Please, explain that one.

2. If cheerleaders' costumes seem crazy to you, then what about Halloween costumes? Do these people who dress up in Halloween should be immediately transferred to a psychiatric hospital then?? >_> .....

Quoting Scoutdog, reply 26757
the sort of behavior I'm talking about is really more social/societal than purely psychological- an illness of society as opposed to an illness of the mind.
End of Scoutdog's quote

Society has a lot worse things than a slight gender oppression, if there is one.

Our society is so corrupt, that these petty things, that make girls wanna seem cute, sexy, innocent, or whatever else, are non-significant.

Quoting Scoutdog, reply 26757
My basic point (in clearer, but somewhat stronger terms) is that these girls have had their initiative and aggression beaten down so thoroughly by American society's rather restrictive gender system that they repress those behaviors and wind up stupid, shallow, naive, and childlike. Now, the important thing is that I used this phenomenon more as an example- I was not trying to say that all cheerleaders are products of this system, but that they usually act like they are, and I find that behavior quite repulsive.
End of Scoutdog's quote

1. Like Altaux said, these girls like cheerleading, and nobody forced them to do this at school. The reasons why some girls cheerlead at school, vary (some do it for the guys, wanting to look sexy), but they have their own reasons, which usually are personal desires, not having much to do with society.

2. Like Draak said, your claims are more of assumptions, than actual facts. Also, I see a lot of personal dislike for cheerleaders here, than society crap.

3. You obviously hate the Japanese schoolgirl effect on this subject. Since you might not be familiar with it, I'm gonna explain just to be sure:

Japanese schoolgirls, usually have an innocent look in their eyes, blinking in a cute kinda way, giggling A LOT when talking to each other, and generally...being Japanese. I cant explain it very well, but there are tons of youtube vids, featuring various Jap girls, staring at a camera for several minutes, not doing or saying anything. I'm sure at least some of you know what I'm talking about.

4. RE: Stupid: They seem stupid to you? Hmmm....I am gonna ask, HOW?? >_> Did they take an IQ test and scored very low? Do they study really hard at school, but still failing to understand a single thing in every subject? Are they retarded? How exactly are they stupid?

5. RE: Shallow: There's not much to say here. Alt said it. Looking directly over a barel, you can never tell exactly how deep it is. Nuf said :typo:

6. RE: Naive: A very wierd claim, since Naivety has many many forms. Explain better, and backup your claims.

7. RE: Childlike: This, has to be (again) the Japanese schoolgirl effect. Looking all innocent and cute, giggling a lot, basically being like a baby. Duh, thats why guys call them babes :P Most people find it, cute and/or sexy.

 

Again, backup all your claims, because all I see right now, is personal opinion.

"Cute Pokemon always get Parahax!"

Reply #26760 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Banned for too few words.

However, to look down on them for being happy doing what they do is something I never understood about people. People always say arrggh sexist this and society that, but in my mind it comes down to the individual. If some one has fun doing cheerleading and is naturally giggly(ie is not acting that) I respect it(especially becuase it takes time and dedication to do those things.)
End of quote
I said I found those characteristics displeasing in people I spend a lot of time around. It's more "I can tell when they're superficial because they rub me the wrong way" as opposed to "I decide that they rub me the wrong way because I think they're superficial".

EDIT: I've realized that "rub me the wrong way" could be taken.... badly considering the subject matter.

Reply #26761 from Demigod Forums Top

Quoting Scoutdog, reply 26762
I said I found those characteristics displeasing in people I spend a lot of time around. It's more "I can tell when they're superficial because they rub me the wrong way" as opposed to "I decide that they rub me the wrong way because I think they're superficial".
EDIT: I've realized that "rub me the wrong way" could be taken.... badly considering the subject matter.
End of Scoutdog's quote

What the.... :(O

Ok, someone translate that, in a language thats not Scoutdoggish.

Banned!

"Cute Pokemon always get Parahax!"

Reply #26762 from Sins Forums Top

banned for you're on your own. I'm going to wait for another topic to get rolling here.

Reply #26763 from Stardock Forums Top

Banned for ragequitting.

 

Regarding the cheerleader/societal conditioning issue, there is pressure to conform to norms; this is not avoidable. I, personally, feel that those norms should not include sexual repression. Yes, the modern concept of cheerleaders is based strongly on indirect expression of sexuality. There are other factors, but the 'ditzy' sterotype comes from the concept of "women are passive actors in sexual matters" combined with the concept of "men have a significantly higher sex drive than women." Those concepts are societally based, not biologically.

Reply #26764 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Regarding the cheerleader/societal conditioning issue, there is pressure to conform to norms; this is not avoidable. I, personally, feel that those norms should not include sexual repression. Yes, the modern concept of cheerleaders is based strongly on indirect expression of sexuality. There are other factors, but the 'ditzy' sterotype comes from the concept of "women are passive actors in sexual matters" combined with the concept of "men have a significantly higher sex drive than women." Those concepts are societally based, not biologically.
End of quote
Banned for making my point for me.

Reply #26765 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for nonsensical topic recycling...

-edit-

TOPIC SWAP

Please...

Reply #26766 from Sins Forums Top

you are all banned for an inane conversation involving cheerleaders and whether or not they are examples of female suppression or not

Reply #26767 from Sins Forums Top

BANNED FOR MENTIONING THE TOPIC.

Reply #26768 from Demigod Forums Top

Banned for CAPS.

Quoting Decius_brutus, reply 26765

Regarding the cheerleader/societal conditioning issue, there is pressure to conform to norms; this is not avoidable. I, personally, feel that those norms should not include sexual repression. Yes, the modern concept of cheerleaders is based strongly on indirect expression of sexuality. There are other factors, but the 'ditzy' sterotype comes from the concept of "women are passive actors in sexual matters" combined with the concept of "men have a significantly higher sex drive than women." Those concepts are societally based, not biologically.
End of Decius_brutus's quote

Oh, a person who can actually make some sense, and speak common English. Finally! |-)

Yes, that is true, but only because we make it so. If there wasnt such corruption in our society, then this wouldnt happen. This is only a result of many different sources, which I am not going tom list atm.

Do you have any idea how many actual pervs are out there? And I am not talking about being a little "kinky", or whatever. I'm talking about sexual perversion.

My point is, that basically you're right, there is such a concept driven by our society, but you are only scratching the surface of 15-inch steel wall here -_-

There are a lot worse things than that. This is really insignificant comparing to other, more important matters.

Quoting Scoutdog, reply 26766

Banned for making my point for me.
End of Scoutdog's quote

Banned for being unable to make a point, or any kind of sense on the matter.

Quoting Syneptus, reply 26767
-edit-

TOPIC SWAP

Please...
End of Syneptus's quote

Begging ftw :P

Quoting Ryat, reply 26768
you are all banned for an inane conversation involving cheerleaders and whether or not they are examples of female suppression or not
End of Ryat's quote

I dont believe that cheerleaders are an example of female suppression, but whatever >_>

"Cute Pokemon always get Parahax!"

Reply #26769 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Banned for prolific quotes and emoticon usage. 

Reply #26770 from WinCustomize Forums Top

Quoting Ryat, reply 26768
you are all banned for an inane conversation involving cheerleaders and whether or not they are examples of female suppression or not
End of Ryat's quote
Banned for overlooking the fact that there are male cheerleaders. 

Oh, a person who can actually make some sense, and speak common English. Finally!
End of quote
  Banned for he was writing, not speaking.

 

Reply #26771 from Sins Forums Top

banned for legoness

Reply #26773 from WinCustomize Forums Top

Banned for having no karma.

+1 Loading…
Reply #26774 from Sins Forums Top

banned for legos have NO SOUL!

Reply #26775 from Demigod Forums Top

Banned cause I used to play with Lego all the time when I was a kid.

 

 

 

 

"Cute Pokemon always get Parahax!"