It seems that unless you use the default Windows 7 font of Segoe UI for menubars and menus, these things will not render with the correct window metrics. Here is an example using the Diamond skin, but with an alternate font specified. Note how menubar items are squished together, dropdown menu items overlap each other or even get cropped. If a large font is used, even weirder things happen. Is there a way to avoid this with custom skin fonts? <img src="h
kwyjibo
Does this mean Fences Pro is a permanent part of Object Desktop?
[quote]No, it does not. The version found at CNet does not require you to have Impulse or IE7 installed for it to install or work.[/quote] Thanks for the tip. I'm checking now for my older PC.
Requires users to upgrade from Internet Explorer 6 or it will not run.
I would like to be able to skin dark backgrounds on everything. No more hard-coded white... or any other colours. The Win7 Explorer sidebar, Calculator, MSpaint and Wordpad are huge offenders. Just make it possible to make truly dark themes.
Can you apply several effects at once? Snow+Sepia?
All of your Master Skins have white window/explorer backgrounds. Please do a skin with black window backgrounds and light text. I would buy that.
Neil, can the white background in the new interface's bottom tab bar be reconsidered to something dark?
I just tried out the dark UI. I like it, but can you change the white tab bar at the bottom to black with bright text? The white background is difficult to read. Question about the new UI: Will I be able to edit specific colours of a skin, still? In the old UI I could fine tune colours of a WB skin, such as the application background and foreground, or the menubar background/foreground (and dozens of others) to create my own substyle.
I am going to try this out right now, because of the dark UI alone.
UI subject to change. You give me hope.
No comment from Stardock on the hard-coded colours?
[quote]In regards to your point about using the customers color scheme...email Stardock (have you?) and see what they say. If you haven't tried/asked, you really shouldn't just give up on them imo.[/quote] [quote]I second that, m1. Wasn't trying to be contentious, kwyjibo. Didn't know you had an eyesight issue. Try emailing stardock, like the Munkeh said.[/quote] I have done that many times. When I saw this screenshot, that they are now changing ObjectDock from its usable interface to ha
[quote]Gimme a break! You're not going to buy it because of the background color?!?[/quote] I have poor vision and must use a high constrast colour scheme with white text on black backgrounds. Applications that ignore the user's colour scheme and their own colours are entirely unreadable to the disabled. Stardock has gradually been hard-coding white backgrounds into all their programs. It's short-sighted and it's terrible and lazy UI design. System colours are easily requested by
You hard-coded white backgrounds into it? That makes it completely unusable under a high contrast colour scheme (white text on black). I guess I know what I'm not buying. Use the system colours. That's what they exist for. I will never understand why a company that prides itself on customization would hard-code their software to be incompatible with customization.
Can you make it use the user's skin and colour scheme? Please, this time around, no hard-coded colours.
How about a tip/trick to stop it from forcing black text on white backgrounds and respect my dark colour scheme?
My suggestion for the UI is to stop forcing black text on white backgrounds and instead RESPECT the user's colour scheme. It makes your applications impossible to use if you have problems with high contrast. It's the same with Skinstudio, which makes me really wish I had my money back. Is that specific enough for you? Why does a customization company hard-code their UIs to be inalterable? It's ridiculous.
"Still" using XP? I was using Vista. It was terrible, so I reinstalled XP.
[quote]Do you know what DRM is?[/quote] Do you know what patronization is? Nobody is asking to copy it.
Who and what are they protecting it from?
[quote]Well it's either that or I guess the companies would tell Stardock, "too bad, we'll go to someone else." That's not gonna help them or us now, is it?[/quote] Who are they going to go to that does what Stardock does? I don't think there IS someone else. :P
[quote]kwyjibo, as Brad just said, they plan to release unencrypted versions of the StardockDesign ones, but the branded themes need the encryption because that's how the companies wanted it, to protect *their* intellectual property.[/quote] Because those companies asked for it does not make it right. A crude comparison: China wants Google to censor search results. Google has a choice to do the right or the wrong thing, but they choose to censor. Why? Because China's government ask
[quote] It's a free theme. What "piracy" do you think is going to occur? IP holders, like AMD, have every right to choose how their IP is distributed. As most should know, Stardock IP in MyColors themes are being released as ZIP files so people can mod it. [/quote] Free to use, but not to customize. But why use DRM at all? Why facilitate it? You can't wash your hands of the existence of Mycolors DRM because Stardock put it there to prevent customization. Yes. It is anti-cus
[quote] But wouldn't the better way to look at the whole MyColors encryption thing be that if it weren't for MyColors then 99% of these "Branded" themes wouldn't even exist and therefore you wouldn't have them to edit anyhow? [/quote] I read [b]Stardock's Gamers' Bill of Rights[/b]. Why is their philosophy the opposite with people that want to customize Windows? I'll quote you this gem: [b]Gamers shall have the right to not be treated as potential criminals by devel