[quote]I can't say I've ever had a problem with {SB}=>Ferdie and I don't have a problem with him. At least he plays the game often and helps keep our player counts up. However, from what I can tell, whatever he's done, he sure has antagonized a number of people.[/quote]That still true Whip after last nights game?
Protoplazm
[quote]Point of the matter is the people on this list have more often than not PISSED YOU OFF. no one else here would have even THOUGHT of a thread such as this.[/quote] Master of overstating the obvious there BSC, of course it PISSES ME OFF when players selfishly foul the gaming experience, but your incorrect sir about the originality of this thread; There have been several similar posts regarding "early warning lists etc." [quote]therefore its a personal vendetta against tho
[quote]Your plan is foiled, I will have cold beer on standby when they come.[/quote]Dang it! Beer is the Subverter of real life!
I understand there is a packet sniffing protocol that is being developed for imbedding in the client side layer before hosted games. Over a course of time, the ip of a smurf is reverberated. Smurfs can be identified via this method, albeit heuristically after they have played under the name a few times. Then, their geographic location is uncovered and mapped, and an anti-smurf goon squad is dispatched to their place. Once revealed, and depending on how rampant a smurfi
Hi, my name is Barbarian! Can you direct me to the troll farm?
[quote who="Qu4r" reply="45" id="2506710"]Ye stop bashing Fat kid. I know he is fat and stinks but ent game afk? noo no Ascension , he will emoquit much earlier. +5 to ferdie for overal dickness[/quote]Quar, did you go to charm school with Siddy?
[quote]no BSC is right you are just bashing him this list is telling people "hey these guys go afk or dont play well guess what you shouldn;t play with them"[/quote]Thanks ravok for the coherent thought! I'm just going to jot that down as one of the most relevant replies ever. Mind if I use it? [quote]lol proto. what about your "end game tendencies" ? more than once ive seen you camp behind a star based planet surrounded by the 3 end game fleets and not quit. why be a hypo
[quote who="Ascension" reply="40" id="2505892"]Proto. get off your wagon. im BSC and the only times i go AFK are the times where something MORE IMPORTANT THAN THIS GAME has come up. and that is rarely. and even so i said i have to go or brb or something like that. ask anyone. i RARELY go AFK. this thread is a simple attack on players. you are no better than anyone of us.[/quote]Thanks for acknowledging that you go afk. Question is, " Why would you go afk for an entire game instead of
[quote]Only reason for this to get locked would be if people start attacking other players. So far, almost everything seems pretty reasonable to me.[/quote]thanks for pointing out the obvious, seriously. [quote]Could someone give a few examples as to when people should be surrendering? Because, at least in the example Swordsalmon gave, i am in disagreement. 70 Illums is a sizable fleet, and it is possible, tho agreeably not likely, to make a comeback. The only time i'll surrender
[quote]i thought it was stuck, but when i zoomed in i saw it slowly arching upwards and a couple seconds later its engines throttled and it flew over them. it just takes ships in Sins a long time to turn, so it looks like theyr stuck. but they DO get around them eventually, if u can spare the time.[/quote]Perhaps caps could get a researchable ability like Intercept for the Kodiaks. Call it, "Evade & Maneuver"
[quote]and just an fyi this post will be locked at some point[/quote]Yeah, about that... If so it's a shame. What really matters in a multiplayer environment just as much as the strategy, tactics, and game mechanics, is the personal dynamics. There should be some measure of accountability for cretins that foul the experience.
[quote who="admiralrain" reply="25" id="2502865"]i view it as the same thing [/quote]Thanks for the input!
[quote]this is gay. seriosuly, 5 gays. this is basically you[/quote]You should be so gay. At least he's so gay he has a girlfriend! :P
[quote]I don't choose sides here but if I had to say something I'd say: at least he doesn't use bright colours to offend normal people's eyes?[/quote]No, just abnormal people :P
[quote]Is this just a post where people b**ch about people they dont like?[/quote]If you don't like people that cross the line of fair play and and exhibit (habitually) inappropriate behavior, the intent here is to have some recourse to report such. Not to bitch so much, but to document. This is in an effort to allow at a minimum somewhere players can provide a "heads up" of undesirable characteristics demonstrated by those reported. If the posts take on an aire of v
Added {SB}=>Ferdie due to several prompts from players across the board that have mentioned his endgame blackmail style expansion/entrench/& ignore.
[quote]It's posts like this that remind me of the adage, "Never engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent." Since you've completely ignored my previous point(s), there's clearly no further help for you.... [/quote]No battle, clearly, especially since your passive-aggressive missives are so anally retentive in their scope. What's next, you going to move on to correcting punctuation? How about if you climb right back up off my ass, and go thread-police some other forums?&
[quote who="Martok" reply="36" id="2499023"] Quoting GJDriessen, reply 32Distant Worlds seems promising. I plan to follow it. Any news on when it is expected to be released? Only that it should be released towards the end of 2010, and even that's not been officially confirmed. At the moment, both Code Force and Matrix Games are being very tight-lipped about the game (including the release date); again, there's supposed to a lot more info made available to the public at the end
Let your Smurf Flag Fly!
[quote who="Martok" reply="31" id="2498302"] Quoting Protoplazm, reply 30Homeworld 3 The thread is about games anticipated to come out in 2010, not games that won't be released til I'm at least in my mid-thirties.... [/quote] “Shack: So it wouldn’t have the true 3D, shift-click movement controls, but… Jonny Ebbert: I think that might be too complex for most people.” Boy are you out of touch with your Homeworld f
Homeworld 3
[quote who="Volt_Cruelerz" reply="16" id="2496964"]... That is, unless you guys like wasting time...[/quote] Serious? Why else would I post Vagyr history?
[quote who="Volt_Cruelerz" reply="16" id="2496964"]... That is, unless you guys like wasting time...[/quote] Serious? Why else would I post Vagyr history?
Ok, ok. So it *was* the Taiidan: The Taiidan have risen under a new leader, the Vaygr warlord named Makaan. He calls himself the Sajuuk-khar, the chosen one; many systems have already fallen under his shadow, and his eyes are set upon Hiigara. The Vaygr are a warrior clan
Ok, the Somtaaw. - their ships don't even use regular Kushan technology; most are based on begged, borrowed, salvaged or stolen Bentusi, Taiidan and Turanic Raider components. Hence the desperation that would lead the Somtaaw to tamper with alien technologies that should be left alone... a