Yes, yes...now about those 11 issues/bugs you have....we're waiting. I DID put a hand out. I DID post your pic. Can we continue moving ahead or do we HAVE to stay mired down in the argumentative? I believe you said you had 11 bugs/issues? There are people in this thread that may be able to help and are probably still willing to. It was 11, right? Post away. OK Po' You may not be capable of understanding this from what
AngryUser
You're paying for the legal right to use the programs. Pretty simple. No I believe you are not correct. I pay a yearly maintenance fee. Since the first year I paid the maintenance fee I have had a legal right to use the last version out when my maintenance contract expires. What I'm paying for with this maintenance fee is updates. Updates I'm interested in are responses to my emails to support@stardock.com. Since I never receive any repl
I don't think I'll be back. I know this breaks your heart! So Sorry! Don't let the door hit you in the ass. Is that the best you can come up with for the guy who blew away your "He lying" campaign. Yeah that comment really takes ppl's mind off the truth. TarkusShakti has really caused you ppl a problem here. He validates what I am saying. Instead of attaching us why don't you try to answer the tough questions in #28 and #46. Pr
Okay. This is the email I received from "DanDunn" without being able to verify it was from him, this is the pic enclosed that the email claim's verify's that he can't log in. You have made a mistake. Look closely at the image - it says both "Welcome AngryUser" (which is a hint that I'm logged in) and "Login Attempt Failed" (which would indicate that I am logged out.) I don't think it is really possible (or practical) to both logged in and out simultaneou
You've come onto the forums with a point that you can't back up well, and you've ignored anything anybody has said that proves a reasonable point. The point I made in the very first post is support@stardock.com doesn't answer emails. What else do I need to say to back that up. Others have acknowledged this has happen to them. And it's many of you which are ignoring that fact. DanDunn
You can post a pic right in the forums No you can only paste a link to a picture...try it yourself (maybe next time before you try to look smart). Exactly what kind of programming did you do? Pong for Atari? No I wrote EFM software for FannieMae. I did so well at that that I was able to retire at age 49. Been retired now for 4 years - and I love it! Thanks for asking.
DanDunn, many reasons have been given as to why you should renew. The only reasons you give not to renew is because you aren't put at the head of the line and have to wait like the rest of us, which I will say again...has always been worth the wait... Again this is just plain stupid - I waited a year for a reply to my emails. Are there so many reported problems and bugs that the waiting time is more than a year? Maybe this is a Freudian slip and there ar
This is DanDunn again. I am unable to log in. I just received an email from TarkusShakti that says he cannot log in and he sent me a synopsis of his problems (which are ditto for me using only firefox). (Funny I can always login as AngryUser) Message from TarkusShakti: " "Tell them I cannot login. I am in Germany and I tried this recently between 1615 and 1630 (your east timezone) Tell them I had my password mailed to me this morning. I tried with Firefox three times like t
Here is a link to a thread where I brought up some issues with support at stardock. The account I used has now been disabled. Another person who seemed to agree with me has had their account disabled too. This website and company must be based in North Korea. Check the link out before they remove it! https://forums.stardock.com/index.aspx?AID=144365
This is DanDunn. I'm logged-in as a different user because my account here has been disabled. I exchanged a couple emails with TarkusShakti this morning after I sent him a personal thanks for his comments. He now informs me that his account has also been disabled. I guess this is what happens when you criticize Stardock. This should be a warning to all. They don't like criticism.