[quote who="nerdile" reply="11" id="3975572"] Been using Stardock software for years and just found this forum. Feels like walking into a bar where everyone knows each other. Seems like a cool crowd. [/quote] Quarter century and counting.... It must be your shout .....;)
I smell spam
[quote who="Carlos Decena" reply="11" id="3974630"] I don't understand what your answering? It's obvious that they are not the same product but from a user perspective a dock at the top of my screen with autohide looks to work similarly. You stated that the reason Fences can't work properly (or as it should from a user perspective) is because "Fences is working on desktop level, hence there is no way to bring your desktop in-front of your Open Windows." Above I am reading that "Objectdoc
[quote]Sadly Microsoft is pushing the installation of Win11 on us even if we don't want or need it. [/quote] Resistance isn't futile. You can always say 'NO'. It's only been the last 6 months or so that original Windows 7 apps have been no longer supported and made inoperable as they evolved and only functioning still in 10 or beyond. All of them can be ignored anyway. This OS was first turned on in January, 2016. It outlived the M.2 dr
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="7" id="3970773"] I sacrificed a perfectly good goat for a "Report Spam" button in the Gallery reply boxes! [/quote] You really do need to RTFM. Have you tried turning it off and turning it on again? ;)
[quote]I have an active subscription to Object Desktop. It almost daily keeps asking me to re-register products that I've installed with my serial number, even though I did it a day or two before. (I re-register each time by linking to my account, and yes it accepted the registration each time). I have experienced this bug in the past and assumed they would have fixed it by now. [/quote] I'm pretty certain this is a side effect of the site recovery which Stardoc
[quote who="pelaird" reply="8" id="3968888"] Outlook is a strange beast. I'm not sure MS uses conventional title bars in Outlook, which may be the issue with Groupy. I use Outlook and have it blocked in the settings. [/quote] Same for me here.... though for me I'm living in a time capsule... Windows 7 and Outlook 2007. I have a few older proggies which really hate Groupy but are likely almost unique to me.... so irrelevant...;)
Don't go too far, Carl... you'll be missed. Take care, Paul.
[quote who="farrellts" reply="5" id="3968716"] Well I'm not sure about a nickname but my login was (and is again) "farrellts". [/quote] Ah...so I see... second use of the same 'nick'...2 separate account IDs... same email. I suspect you must have been one whose activity/history was lost in the crash. If you have a third party [and uncommon] program installed then I'd be seriously taking a closer look at that as the cause of the issues you are seeing...;)
[quote who="farrellts" reply="2" id="3968554"] It's because when I came in to make this post, my account was no longer there. I have no idea how or why. I've never done anything on this form to have my account deleted or suspended or whatever. Thanks for your sarcastic post. I'm looking for real answers not this kind of crap! [/quote] Can you let us know what your original account nick was so we can coordinate responses. Stardock's sites went dark for around a month
[quote]I joined and used it for over a week. [/quote] Iben.... WTF is it? You sort of left out the important bit of your 'review' ...;)
[quote who="XFaern" reply="4" id="3968106"] Yes, it does. We can mark this one as resolved. I reset my PC and it started working. Drastic solution but I felt like it had to be some kind of misconfiguration on my end. [/quote] Good to hear... [not about misconfiguration on your end] but that it's resolved...;)
[quote who="mortenskerra" reply="11" id="3967733"] There's probably a reason it's being detected. [/quote] Yes, it was explained above in comment #3.
[quote who="Iben" reply="26" id="3967222"] I'm linking to an AI wallpaper I like because I don't own it. [/quote] Until "The World" creates International Copyright Laws that include AI 'generated' graphics specifically there is absolutely no restriction on their posting. Sad reality is that nothing anyone ever currently 'creates' using AI can be legally 'owned'.... even by the person who did all the button clicking.
Unless you hear otherwise from Stardock support on this thread, assume it's someone attempting to access your details. Do NOT do anything suggested by the email.
[quote who="Stiggg" reply="12" id="3966390"] Am I on the list? [/quote] Nope. You're not on the list T-Man posted, so you 'should' be able to log out and back in as a cache issue. Am still hanging out for an online response from Adam re correct/successful solution to failed logins... but please be aware the recovery is still a work in progress.
[quote who="Ulysses Ulysses" reply="8" id="3966338"] Hi, where is this list of users that are lost in the crash. I have someone on a forum that is asking but can not post for possibly obvious reasons. [/quote] PM me the User name and I'll check the list for you. Probably a privacy issue to list them all publicly ...;)
[quote who="StarGazer1777" reply="21" id="3966145"] PS: Your "whacky" (your words, not mine), reminds so much of the Concord. That was a beautiful piece of Aeronautic! [/quote] It's a North American XB70 Valkyrie ... almost twice as fast as a Concorde... The 'whacky' bit is it's about the last plane imaginable likely to be used by the Thunderbirds Team [and not 'just' because there is only one surviving]. It was designed to supercruise riding its own shockwave.
[quote]I honestly can't remember how I got them to work together, [/quote] You work it out. It's not "spin". It's policy.
One last time. Stardock's Devs do not want their programs to damage a user's system so work to ensure programs can co-exist without system failure. That has absolutely nothing to do with promoting the duplication of shell enhancements. It is about system stability. You SHOULD only apply one shell modification for 'Start', however, if you MUST use 2 at least you know Stardock's program will not brick your system. The same cannot be said for the second prog
On a 'helping note'. Stardock's Devs have clearly set a check code in place to determine if/when the user also has SAB installed. To therefore NOT brick your OS it would follow that SAB is installed first so Start 11 is aware of it when installed second. Other than that I simply would never use 2 at once as potentially 'stability' would be at risk with any updates/alterations to SAB if nothing else.
[quote who="eliminatrix64" reply="7" id="3965769"] the developers of Start11 are making a conscious and deliberate effort to actually ensure that both programs could be used concurrently without a loss of functionality in Start11. [/quote] Or a deliberate effort to try to protect users such as yourself from tanking your OS totally. Perhaps you can elucidate as to what efforts have been made on the part of StartAllBack for co-existing "nicely" with St
[quote who="Knobula" reply="20" id="3965741"] Wait, is the OS/2 *running* in a box? [/quote] No, it's 'box' is the retail packaging. Last time it ran anywhere was quite some time ago. A bit like having Dos 6.22 on 5 1/4" floppies .... in a box ...;) [I have them too]
[quote who="eliminatrix64" reply="2" id="3965752"] That's...less than helpful. Thanks for playing. It obviously does work and as I mentioned, has worked for an extensive period of time. If you're not willing to help me work this one out, why did you bother replying? Your reply doesn't help or provide any support in any way, shape or form. [/quote] Stardock's Support is for Stardock's Products. Stardock's Start 11 is intended to be used specificall
Someone will hit me but I'm still playing Spider Solitaire....the one that dates back to XP. ;)