I always seem to hear (or read) about some Bush/War supporter who says the media is biased and only focusing on the negative and are hurting Bush when they do that etc...Be happy the media isn't doing their jobs. While some people whine about the bulls**t liberal media focusing on the negative in Iraq, they forget the media isn't asking any questions as to why some
Russia caused World War 2? Hmmmm. Well, I know Russia ensured an Allied victory in World War 2. It' also should be noted that Russia couldn't have fough off the Nazi's had it not been for the American materiel especially and maybe specifically the trucks and motor transport. I believe my books on the subject state that the US M-somethingIcan'trecallrightnow tank was despised by Russian tank crews. Two books specifically mention the "valves go to pieces
I often wonder how it's possible ordinary citizens can be so ignorant not only about other cultures, but also to their own recent past. How is it possible so many people can be so easily and gullibly led by their own foreign a policy planners who regard the world map as an unsupervised giant toy box that they own? Apparently very easily. Let me tell you something that will shed light on what it is you all are predictably misinformed about, and it's s
That type of language isn't for ladies.
I say the future has already come and gone. And it's interesting how the average American still clings to the silly notion that the US is the land of the free. But this is something I've been saying for a long time now.
While I understand what you're saying I don't really go along with it. And I'm the king of honesty here. When it comes to public life, if you swear some kind of oath to society or something like that, honesty is paramount and to me mandatory. But if it deals entirely with personal matters, if it involves friends and aquaintances in your life, honesty isn't always the best route to take. For example, a politician supposedly represents the people in his
Ha. Yeah kill them all and let God sort them out. So depraved. And Moderate man my apology for my false assumption. To tell the truth I never read the rest of your words because I wanted to get to this immediately. What's your history in the military? Which war were you in? The 1st Gulf or this one? Or...HA this is funny. I decided to scroll up and read your words and saw what you were saying about me. That's funny. Well let me tell you piece of useles
"why are we treating these animals with any dignity at all in the first place?" Because it's like Noam says. If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all. Why are you not in the military Moderateman? What's keeping you from giving out your brand of justice on those you hate and despise so much. You're comments are ignorant and unworthy of a human being, right on par for your course. You need to
The Israeli Airport is likely the most secure airport in the world. I think they have an excellent safety record in relation to the threat level they have to endure.
Just kick that respect over to me there Gidman. You freed me from exile at one time.
Chip you make a valid point but what you're actually saying is not taken in the proper context. I am not and have never said the military itself doesn't keep written track of which and how many of their soldiers are getting killed or wounded. There are, after all, lots of paperwork involved for his beneficiaries to complete, and of course the dead are remembered and buried. What I am saying, and have always been saying, is that no one in the military o
It's very easy to conclude one very easy rational fact. High numbers of dead can stop a country's foreign policy. If the death figures are a lot higher the public doesn't accept it as being worth it. If the death figures are a lot lower the public accepts it as being worth it. Once we acknowledge that basic truism, the following facts fall into a perfect line. I menti
Thanks for responding fishman. If you have a background in military intelligence, you must have a professional opinion about the weapon systems the Russians have been exporting, free of charge from what I understand, to Syria and Iran and a few other nations as well. What is your knowledge about India's BrahMos system, the one created by the Russian-Indian coalition? Is it true what I read about their capabilities? What is the US's counter defense to a
Since April 1961, the month Yuri Gagarin circled our planet in the Russian's Vostok 1, Russia has developed more sophisticated weapons systems and more sophisticated space launch systems than the USA. Some like to think that the US mainstream media has shed some credibility only recently, but the beneficial deceptions have been going on for a lot longer than most of u
The oil for food program was of such huge proportions that's it's impossible to find out the 100% full entire story on the abuses and which officials were involved and so forth. Let's think rationally about it as usual. Terf might not know about the dirty and sometimes completely covert dealings that go on in the oil industry. Oil is interlocked with politics which it turn means its interlocked with corruption as well. His righteous indignation about t
Baker thanks for absolutely nothing. What kind of response it that? Not civil at all and it shows insight into your much weaker mind. This propaganda as you think of it is historically verifiable and deemed completely correct. Sorry for the language but go get a fucking brain and read a fucking book before you come in here and insult me for absolutely no reason other than you're a weak-minded fool who would rather call reality propaganda and hide it fr
General Helmut Wilberg was personally awarded, by Hitler himself, the Hohenzollern's Knight's Cross with Swords, EKI and EKII. Walter H. Hollaender, a Wehrmacht Colonel, was personally decorated, by Hitler himself, the Ritterkreuz, German-Cross in Gold, EKI, EKII, and Close Combat Badge. As any normal informed individual should already know, military decorations are,
Holy shit justJohn maybe you ought to read the thread. When someone posts stories of great success and it's the military itself who posts it...it's biased tripe. If you read JihadUnspun and post stories of great successes and it's the Islamist extremists who are making those success statements...it's biased tripe. So it's John and Mason who respond negatively to articles they haven't even taken the time to read OR understand. Sheesh.
Why 911? Why? I have seen the very interesting flight manifests for all four airlines on that day and not one single arab among them. The only thing to like Muslims to 911 is the ridiculous Atta passport that miraculously survived a fire that supposedly melted steel cores and the impossible telephone call Barbara Olson never would have been able to transmit. Check a CNN google search on Barbara Olson and see what comes up. 2 articles and nothing more? You may not know it miler but the Taliban of
Thanks Mason. You proved my point. Did you not read what I was making this thread about? A cheerleading biased news report is not a reliable source of information. Again thanks for proving my point.
But Bush says he's acting in the Lord's name, and that includes killing other humans. Do you have a stance on that reality at all? The top man in Fallujah, right before the battle, told his men the enemy in in Fallujah and his name is Satan. Religion is playing a mighty role in destructive American foreign policy issues.
Don't fall into the mindtrap which makes you think any Islamic group would not adhere to the MAD fact of life. To do so is to think they would willingly sacrifice not only themselves but also their families and friends and communities of all age groups of all genders and finally even their entire nation. And that's not going to happen. It's all a lie and to believe them (Islamists) capable of doing somthing like that shows you trust in the mainstream m
Since some here like to make very nice and tidy (but false) claims of the raging successes of the American troops in Iraq. But those claims are taken from a US military site, which of course is bound by duty to report success and never dismal failure. There is no way anyone can take creedence in their battle reports when it's obviously not going to be reporting on the
"We had every excuse after 9-11 to finally seriously screw with Saudi Arabia, and we didn't take the chance. Once we started pulling troops out, we could have taken a much harder line with them. They aren't much better than Hussein and it is hypocritical that we treat them as allies when they hate us." The clinching term you used there, though unintended, is when you said you 'didn't take the chance'. It's for good reason the US never went after Sa
You have to tell me which president has done worse than Bush and why. This grading thing is kind of a good idea. Let's see what I can come up with. Afghanistan. I have to obviously give him an 'F' and here's why. The opium production. Like them or not, the Taliban had succeeded in curtailing opium production to the tune of nearly 100%. And there was even obvious signs of that when you see how much less heroin was able to flood the international drug ma
JoeUser Forums