Even on my XP notebook with ATI IGP 340 graphics, WFX's performance is significantly limited & I'm stuck with Fujitsu's proprietary ATI driver set that they haven't updated since I bought the rig 14 months ago.
I recently bought my wife a new Fujitsu wide-screen XP MCE notebook with a new ATI mobile GPU & dedicated VRAM - I've been itching to try WFX on that rig, but I've been told where to look for my nuts if I so much as touch it.
Cheers,
Daiwa
Change (CPU name) to AGP driver to PCI standard for PCI to PCI Bridge and BSODs during playing games or movies will competely stop. No idea why, I found it at some site and it worked for me.
Toshiba Satellite with Mobility Radeon type video for laptop.
| Since I don't want anyone to take my remarks personally (if I disagree with someone, it's about ideas expressed or positions taken, with the rare exception of folks who are deliberately insulting or intentionally offensive), I virtually always sign off with Cheers, regardless of context - force of habit. |
I actually find it a bit annoying that you sign your name to each post in a thread. But the other hand I guess you're free to do so.
| I hardly think I 'inspire fear'... |
Jafo you have inspired fear in me before at times.
| Through no fault of Stardock's, nVidia hasn't followed through, since you are quite correct - the only market they care about is the 3D gaming market. Rather unfair to hold SD responsible - we should be complaining to the video driver makers (I have, repeatedly) in order to get some of that "grease", though I'm not optimistic they'll do anything to address their 2D deficiencies |
Well, to me the next logical step for SD would have been to change the code of their app to better suit the unchangeable limitations of the chipsets. Remember the application development is dependant upon chipset design, not the other way arround.
| Well, to me the next logical step for SD would have been to change the code of their app to better suit the unchangeable limitations of the chipsets. Remember the application development is dependant upon chipset design, not the other way arround. |
I'd agree if that were in fact a way to fix it. I'm no programmer, but from what I've read about it, including what the lead developer of WB has said, it's the 2D drivers that dictate what can & can't be done with the display & SD can't make gold out of tin. SD has actually done just what you suggest - they developed a workaround for nVidia cards but the drivers will only do so much so the transitions that look & work great on ATI rigs with the right drivers simply look crappy or don't work at all on nVidia rigs.
Che..
| I actually find it a bit annoying that you sign your name to each post in a thread. |
Fair enough. I've always considered it just a courteous thing to do. To each his own.
| yeah Dave....don't know what got into Kona last night but signing off is, in most correspondence, whether memo or letterhead, the professional thing to do unless Kona finds these treads so linear it is redundant & un-necessary to do so in his opinion |
Name one other person here at WC that signs off with his name after a post. It's just not the way people post here at WC.
I really don't care. Sign your name if you wish.
| Name one other person here at WC that signs off with his name after a post. It's just not the way people post here at WC. |
Kona...look more closely....there are many, most are new to the site and are perhaps unaware their login nick is auto-posted.
Let's stick to JRSCCivic's topic, m'kay?...
| Let's stick to JRSCCivic's topic, m'kay?... |
Yeah, this is not an OT thread. You girls want to bicker about signatures on posts and you can take it somewhere else. What is it with you guys? What are you like 12?
| they developed a workaround for nVidia cards but the drivers will only do so much so the transitions that look & work great on ATI rigs with the right drivers simply look crappy or don't work at all on nVidia rigs. |
It wouldn't be the first thing that doesn't work well on nVidia cards. This is one of the reasons why I like ATIs instead... and the fact that I get a new driver revision every month like clockwork.
I wonder if Neil has gotten a chance to test WB on that new laptop SD got.
Good luck solving your problems.
My guess is that currently it may be 3.26 pm, Friday here...it's something like 11.26pm, Thursday there...
I work roughly 9 to 5-ish.... and if I were expected to be dealing with 'work issues' after midnight I'd be likely to be thumping people severely...
| Name one other person here at WC that signs off with his name after a post |
-=Tycus=-
| BTW, do you have a ticket open with Stardock? That way you know a tech is working on it and you can track progress? |
Now that's funny. I've mentioned this to them several times and other things by calling in. Never got a ticket of any kind. They simply state... I'm sure we'll get it fixed.And it's Friday... not exactly the weekend yet. This has gone on long enough. Neil test the darn thing already... sheesh!
| Now that's funny. |
I didn't mean it to be funny.
Typically in a support industry, if you don't have a case/ticket/whatever you can't expect to get the same level of service unless it's an easy fix that can be done right away.
If I'm a support tech, and I have a queue of users expecting support that was promised (implied) to them when they created the case, I'm going to work that queue. If I'm that tech and I'm not getting a response form a dev to resolve a problem . . . I'm going to apply pressure.
It seems to me that a post here in the community forum does not have the same weight as a case with Stardock.
It might be a good practice if Stardock is going to respond to the forum for a problem that a particular user is having that will take time and that only Stardock can resolve, they create a case.
But that's just me and my opinion. That and $4 will buy you voffee at Starbucks.
| #66 by JRSCCivic98 Thu, February 23, 2006 2:31 PM How are you comming along on this Neil? Have you had a chance to test out the new laptop yet to duplicate the problem inhouse? |
| #67 by JRSCCivic98 Thu, February 23, 2006 11:17 PM Does SD actually read this forum or what? |
9 hours.
Talk about sheesh.
I am hoping to get the laptop tested soon but it is actually a machine thats in use by someone so its a matter of fitting in with their schedule.
Please remember that I am not tech support so its not uncommon for me to not read the forums for a few days. That doesn't mean I am sitting around doing nothing.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting and posting on the forums.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!