It all depends on just how many people we really want to get upset.
If the bar were properly raised to a truly 'exclusive' level, a large number of artists would have nothing accepted at all.
If you wish, the cull can be more brutal, and a lot of egos will suffer.
It is a delicate, thin line between 'art' and 'wallpaper'...some walls may be a little 'simplistic' or even 'naive', but can be valid wallpapers, found popular by many.
I personally can get a lot more brutal.
I could maintain the cull to about 500 as a consistent number of walls...as more come and are better than those there already, maybe others then get kicked, maintaining the total.
To give an example of how aggressive I would/could be, click on my name.
I have two 'walls', very average popularity, but rating a '7' and a '9'.
They are very definitely 'artwork', as they both were actually painted water-colours, and only afterwards, manipulated on computer.
They show a certain ability....
BUT...
They don't necessarily work as walls.
Why?
Subject matter, I assume, hence the unwild download number.
They would be culled by me, because although they may have had more effort in their creation than a blue swirlie with 'XP' slapped on it, they don't seem to cut it as wallpapers.
I won't play favourites, you realize.
Even those of you able to upload without going through the moderation process can be moderated.
I have been through the ENTIRE wall section 3 times in the past week.
I know it well.
28 existing walls met their waterloo yesterday.
Just say the word.
Call it the night of the long knives.....
It can be done.
But it will hurt a little.
Opinions?.....
WinCustomize Forums
