Randy Spire

Randy Spire

Joined Member # 876704
0 Posts 2 Replies 115 Reputation

'As far as I understand, a person must hate homosexuals to be a homophobe." And what you show is your ignorance, because you are using a wrong definition. homophobes are not people who hate queirs. homophobes are those who are afraid (hence 'phobe'). meaning you don't understand them or your own queir aspects and are therefore afradi of them. we are afraid of things we don't know or understand. so before y'all go on and on about

16 Replies 4,727 Views

I have no intention to waste a vote, and I realize it's impact and generally agree with most of what you said. but you also got to pull the donkey, or spank it as Sharpton would say. I have no illusions of pulling the donkey out of the barn, but i can keep him as close to the door as possible. if i just let go now he'll just wander back inside. I am voting for Nader until Nov. 3. Democratic party united.

18 Replies 4,373 Views

you know brad, this would all be a little more believeable if you threw in some more mispelings and typeos, ya kno??

5 Replies 10,021 Views

when you start your post as a question and with your bias so obvious, all the rest of any argument you may make becomes irrelevent. if you actually want to ask a question, ask it. If you want to make a point of persuasion, thata is something else. I stopped reading after your first line because you made it clear you weren't actually interested in another opinion, and even by the title itself. This isn't an open topic, this is christian evangelism.

21 Replies 4,959 Views

In Brad's case, he likes to "round off" to exclude certain ideas that don't fit in with the argument he's trying to make or that are otherwise inconvenient. I'm surprised he's even posting here, where he can't control deleting messages of others or get points for it.

7 Replies 2,720 Views

I agree James Nonegan. CONSTITUTION OF OREGON Article 1, Section 20. Equality of privileges and immunities of citizens. No law shall be passed granting to any citizen or class of citizens privileges, or immunities, which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens.

186 Replies 45,954 Views

I think the essence of Kant's imperative regarding a universal morality was not to define one, per se, nor to claim that one in fact exists. I think it was intended more as an attitude to be assumed by individuals as a guide for making moral decisions. This isn't in opposition to your comments, just different I think.

36 Replies 12,842 Views

Typical black and white thinking, This vs. That, US v Europe, Freedom v Fairness, Light v Dark etc. it's endless and serves no point, the Real world is not like that. Only good for stirring controversy, getting lots of hits, comments, points, and some ego-stroking. Once again, well done brad.

155 Replies 75,493 Views