watchitman

Looks fine you say? Then you're not looking very closely. Every single WB skin (except the built in MS skin format) has a gap between the WB frame and the content. Every. Single. One. I'm not going to reinstall WB just to take some screen shots. Just open your friggin' eyes and look at Chrome while using WB. As for Iconpackager: It mangles system icons and it doesn't display live folders properly. That's not a minor thing since essentially every folder is a live folder. Now someo

Of course you would say that, then people wouldn't buy your product. And most modders DO NOT. I've NEVER had issues with the patcher to the extent I've seen with WB. Windowsblinds simply isn't very good. And for your information, I was running with the original, unaltered files while running Windowblinds.

Then WB is broken because Aero and Aero mods using the uxtheme patcher behave correctly. Speaking of broken, IconPackager doesn't work well either. I'm beginning to feel I wasted my money. No wonder so few modders use Stardock tools anymore. I hope they can make it with their games.

Just installed the beta and FF 4 and IE 9 now display correctly. But what about Chrome? It's not a new browser anymore, I think it's time it got a little love.

I just renewed my Object Dock subscription after leaving it for 4 years because I wanted to throw a little support behind Stardock because of their problems with their recent game launch (being an indie game developer myself, I sympathize). But there's a problem. My favourite web browser is Google Chrome but guess what, after being out for over 2 years, Stardock still hasn't fixed the glitches with it and WB. But hey, I thought that since I paid for WB, I might as well go back to FF