Polynomial

[quote who="4Nana" reply="19" id="2724317"]The only thing demigod needs is a re-release with a LOT of bug fixes, a new ladder system that actually works and includes teams, and a matchmaking system for teams. The crappy release lost many potential players, and the complete lack of fixes to the majority of problems still around to date ensured that the slim chances of a revitalization in player base was never going to happen. Millions of dropped lobbies, random dc's in game, a

[quote who="OMG_nomilarac" reply="15" id="2723934"]@jongalt Sigh at "demigod is not worth supporting". Sigh at the fact Chris Taylor didn't announce anything, he just said they'd be interested in making a sequel TO MAKE MONEY BACK from the initial investment in DG. Even IF it happened (which IF made well could be great), sigh at GPG probably making a consolized POS which would be less worth playing than the original DG. Just take a look at what they did with Su

The way Chris talks in that video makes me think he actually is starting to understand the community. The video blogs certainly help.

[quote who="OMG_DD-shred_demon" reply="10" id="2723810"]I think it's good news Guess we got to hope for the best and that a multiplatform demigod 2 will have all the issues in demigod 1 ironed out and will be what demigod 1 was meant to be.[/quote] That's the spirit!

[quote who="Colonel_Jessep" reply="7" id="2723589"]O, interesting. Not that I'm really surprised, Demigod is the last IP with potential GPG still owns. I wonder how they are going to publish it. I hope it will be a cooperation with Stardock again. Who else thinks the Generals' days are numbered when this goes multiplatform?[/quote] Doubt it. Supreme Commander 2 was on consoles =P

[quote who="OMG_nomilarac" reply="5" id="2723570"]FFS guys please watch the damn interview before posting such a thing, ALL he says is they /WOULD/ be interested in making a sequel to further milk the already stablished franchise/IP and fanbase. Hell anything he says about demigod is money related. So yeah, wohoooooo, they MIGHT make a sequel instead of supporting demigod 1 [/quote] Demigod 1 is not worth supporting.

I'm still not sure I believe it. I've sent emails to him asking for a sequel. >.

no u lie

[quote who="OMG_pacov" reply="23" id="2715165"] Quoting OMG-howboutnoooo, reply 22hey demigod had a tournamet so you lie true - 1 esl tourney and 1 community run 1. [/quote] All right, it never had any legit tournaments run by Stardock or GPG. (which were promised but never came...) But Monday Night Combat is just so much better than Demigod.

[quote who="PurplePaladin" reply="242" id="2714918"] Quoting Polynomial, reply 220I'm not even sure who wants to sit down for hours and play a game like this multiplayer anyways >.> People with friends and family "Vork" . . . .[/quote] Stardock does not owe you anything but 1 fully functional game license.

Right after Society comes out.

I'm not even sure who wants to sit down for hours and play a game like this multiplayer anyways >.>

[quote who="psychoravin" reply="126" id="2714412"] Quoting Polynomial, reply 6 Quoting Nesrie, reply 5 Quoting Polynomial, reply 2Archival DVDs? Really, Frogboy? Is there reeeaaally that much demand for patches on DVDs?I think this is awesome, and yes there is. I want to be able to have access to the game, as Stardock intended it to be played, long after Stardock is gone (if that happens of course, it might not).Great new, and thank you. No, t

[quote who="NTJedi" reply="122" id="2714405"] Quoting Polynomial, reply 120If I was Frogboy, I would go crazy too. Elemental's LAN policy of each person buying a serial key is not insane. Besides, this game will be primarily single player anyways. So a family of 4 is expected to spend $200.oo so they can all play Elemental together and then if the first expansion costs $30.oo they are expected to spend another $120.oo so they can all play with the expansion!! Since money

If I was Frogboy, I would go crazy too. Elemental's LAN policy of each person buying a serial key is not insane. Besides, this game will be primarily single player anyways.

[quote who="blix2006" reply="11" id="2713938"] Quoting Polynomial, reply 2Archival DVDs? Really, Frogboy? Is there reeeaaally that much demand for patches on DVDs? like it was said..who cares its just more options.not sure why you felt it was something to criticize but theres only at least one in every post i suppose...[/quote] I'm not trying to troll! I was asking Frogboy because this seems so archaic coming from a company all about digital distribution.

[quote who="Nesrie" reply="9" id="2713926"] Quoting Polynomial, reply 8Every so often there are posts on the forums from some guy who takes issue with digitally downloading patches. There is no demand for this worthy of a commercial investment. Its an option Stardock can quote to these people. Its about keeping options open. You know, I knew you weren't really asking a question. It was one of those rhetorical bs lines that you like to spit out all over the place. But hey, I do

Every so often there are posts on the forums from some guy who takes issue with digitally downloading patches. There is no demand for this worthy of a commercial investment. Its an option Stardock can quote to these people. Its about keeping options open.

[quote who="Nesrie" reply="5" id="2713916"] Quoting Polynomial, reply 2Archival DVDs? Really, Frogboy? Is there reeeaaally that much demand for patches on DVDs? I think this is awesome, and yes there is. I want to be able to have access to the game, as Stardock intended it to be played, long after Stardock is gone (if that happens of course, it might not). Great new, and thank you.[/quote] No, there is no demand for patches on DVDs. Its for the few crazy typ

[quote who="Tridus" reply="30" id="2712273"] Quoting Polynomial, reply 24 I'm beginning to wonder if anyone on these forums even likes video games. First no one likes Bioware games, now people slam one of gaming's landmark games. You think it's bad now, wait and see what'll happen if it turns out to use Steamworks. (There's a seperate Steam-free Civ 5 thread for that reason.) [/quote] I'll get it for 360 if it has Steamworks. That's al

[quote who="LEADER MkII" reply="27" id="2712249"]The golf club part was good waaaayyyy better than the crappy end-game boss and so-called "open" ending:[/quote] Kev Levine even said in retrospect everything after the golf club scene sucks.

[quote who="Annatar11" reply="25" id="2712229"]BioShock is far from a "landmark" game. It just got so much attention because it tried being a story-driven modern FPS instead of a plain shooter - and it did that mostly by just having you look around for old recordings. The gameplay remained a plain and generic shooter. Like I said, generic shooter in a pretty wrapper. It just stood out because none of the other games tried to focus on the atmosphere or story.[/quote] Annatar, I've alwa

I'm beginning to wonder if anyone on these forums even likes video games. First no one likes Bioware games, now people slam one of gaming's landmark games.

Zehdon, you have to play it before you render judgment. Ken Levine has a good idea of what he's doing. I won't take opinions seriously until we all do. See you in 2 years. =P Besides, the studio is 20 minutes from my house. I got to root for the home team.

[quote who="ZehDon" reply="17" id="2711874"]Wow. Annualising Bioshock. I expected them to at least call it something different. Bioshock stood on it's own merits and became a very successful IP because it was simply good. Bioshock 2 cashed in on that, and delivered a bit of an encore. Not essential, but not terrible to the point of burning the franchise to ground... or tying balloons to it and floating it into the fucking sky, either. Bioshock 4: Moder