[quote who="DaveBax" reply="17" id="3531371"]I believe you are thinking that everyone knows what the young people know today. I have Grandchildren that can run rings around me with their Smart Phones. I expect that as they grew up with them. They range in age from 12 to 21. Now if I went out and purchased one of these dolls for my younger one I would have no idea about this stuff. I do now because of post like this but don't assume we all know about this knowledge. It doesn't make us
Kevin_Walter
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="9" id="3531347"]Easily said when someone tells you about it...but had the source not written the article, I certainly wouldn't have known. How often have you researched Barbie Dolls and Third Party Privacy regulations?[/quote] I'd like to think most people are intelligent enough to deduce that a doll that not only comes packaged with voice-recognition software, but also connects to the internet, is likely going to be transmitting data o
Much ado about nothing, imo. If you don't want your kids to have access to it, don't give them access to it. The same can be said of those tvs. Obviously, the tv is going to be listening at all times if it has voice-recognition software that allows you to interact with it via voice commands. What should also be obvious is that the only way they're going to be able to improve that function is by monitoring it. The statements made by Samsung and Mattel should go w
They're not really getting rid of Internet Explorer. They're just rebranding it. Despite the "lipstick on IE" comment, you can rest assured that's all they're really doing. They know that Internet Explorer has a stigma to it that most people tend to avoid, and now they want to distance themselves from that stigma. A new name, a new look, and a few new features usually go a long way toward doing that for most people.
[quote who="LightStar" reply="10" id="3531080"] Actually it has to do with the operating system itself, not sure where I read it, but since Windows Vista I think when you apply an icon package it displays the folder icons for an instant, then reverts to the standard operating system icon. The funny thing is, empty folders display using the IconPackager icon, but folders with files in it do not. Maybe it is something Stardock can fix, who knows. I saw a workaround somewhere here on the si
It's not nearly as clean now, and it's all sort of shifted around. Everything fits on the wall that the black shelves are on in these pics. The only thing that is still in the same location is the old square end-table thing that the tower is on. And no, the desk isn't bowed. The front of it is slightly con
[quote who="Gaspershooters" reply="8" id="3531009"] You cannot,that's imperfect of IP awhile. [/quote] Not true. It comes down to whether or not the package in question has those icons. If it doesn't, they'll just remain the default Windows icons. IconPackager can indeed change the icons of all of the icons he has shown in those images. A lot of the older Icon Packages were made for Windows XP, which didn't have many of the library icons used b
[quote who="LightStar" reply="100" id="3530989"] They may be listening... http://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-asks-for-feedback-on-windows-10-icons-shows-off-entirely-new-set [/quote] Those are a LOT better. I really hope they launch with those instead of the craptastic ones they currently have.
Cool! [e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e]
I figured I would bump this, since I've finally gotten around to working on it some more. This screenshot doesn't show much that hasn't been seen already, with the exception of some new icons. I'm not sure if I care for how the folders look, and I'm definitely going to change the Desktop icon. There are also a whole bunch of icons I still haven't done in the package, though I
So what then, you like to go around talking crap about other people's work while conveniently being too afraid to share your own?
The point is that if you think you can do better... do it.
[quote who="GregII" reply="3" id="3530692"] "The rules" should have the word "quality" in them. [/quote] If you don't like the things other people make, you're perfectly free to show them how it's done.
Well the entire point of icons is to be easily recognizable and distinguishable. The more detailed you make an icon, the more convoluted and arbitrary it tends to be. The more convoluted and arbitrary, the less it tends to make sense. This is why "flat" icon design has become so popular. It basically has evolved from logo design. If you look at most logos, they're flat. There tends to be very little in terms of gradients, highlights, or "3D" design elements. This is because log
[quote who="LightStar" reply="134" id="3530677"] Long time no hear Kevin! Looks great tome! Clean and functional. [e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e] [/quote] Thanks, Tom! And you're right, it's been a long time. I finally got Skype loaded up again, too. I'm looking to have this things finished soon.
Something I was working on last year, then stopped working on because I got too busy and ended up switching back to Aero, and then finally got around to start working on again. At any rate, it's being used by me currently...
I don't think MS will ever be customization-focused. They know people like to change the UI to their favorite color or whatever, and apply different wallpaper. Beyond that, I highly doubt they really care. I also don't think they purposefully "hard code" anything in some kind of grand scheme to thwart customization. It's more likely to be an issue of laziness or efficiency on the part of their UI designers. Grouping multiple objects together so that they can be easily c
[quote who="Leo in WI" reply="7" id="3481074"] Quoting Kevin_Walter, reply 6 I wonder if this can be safely used to kill the shell32.dll file so that it can be replaced... Sure, you're not SUPPOSED to mess with it, but those icons sure are ugly! [e digicons]:thumbsdown:[/e] The only luck I
I wonder if this can be safely used to kill the shell32.dll file so that it can be replaced... Sure, you're not SUPPOSED to mess with it, but those icons sure are ugly! [e digicons]:thumbsdown:[/e] The only luck I've had with replacing that particular file is by booting into my Linux installation, mounting my Windows drive, and replacing the file from there. That's less than ideal, though.
[quote who="2of3" reply="13" id="3480649"] I would download that! It also looks like a a skin that wouldn't look like crap on windows 8 (which is hard to do as windows 8 will be the death of WB skinning if they can't find a way to skin ALL the elements in the UI) [/quote] Thanks! I have no idea how well this would hold up in Windows 8, as I don't have Windows 8 nor WB8. [e digicons]:\[/e]
Hooray for full sized screenshots! Nearing completion now. Though I don't think I'll release this until I get the Icon Package mostly finished. [e digicons]B)[/e] [img]http://i.imgur.com/EK7s6bl.jpg[/img]
Thanks for the comments. [e digicons]B)[/e] Here's another screenshot. Windows seem to be (mostly) completed! [img]http://i.imgur.com/deOgbwh.jpg[/img]
This looks decent enough, but I tend to avoid Sci-Fi shows in general. They're really cheesy. The last ones I've actually enjoyed were Firefly and Stargate SG1. I do watch The Walking Dead... and even that is pretty cheesy. I wouldn't say I really "enjoy" it. It's just one of those shows that I watch for no reason. Sort of like an addiction. Gotta see what happens next, right? I might give this show a chance someday though. Maybe if they ever get around t
[quote who="vStyler" reply="6" id="3480365"] Quoting Kevin_Walter, reply 5 Hey! I thought this was going to be purple! why? [e digicons]XD[/e] [/quote] Inside joke... lol
Hey! I thought this was going to be purple! [e digicons]>:([/e] [e digicons];P[/e]