Try this……..turn off your pc……..then reboot…..when logon screen appears..Ctrl+ Alt+Delete. This should bring up windows logon.
SIXX21
could not afford the O and the R,
OH MY............Will Stardock care?
Did they even go as far as to steal the Microsoft Search Dog, too???!! <img src="http://im
There’s only 2 people who know where (621) aka (SIXX21) came from and what it really means. But I’m not 1 of them. Ok I do know………but really can’t say.
Is there any particular Logon you need to modify for wide screen? Or are you making a custom logon?
I'd have to say leave now while you still have the chance......... <img src="http://images
Thanks Corky…..your knowledge in much appreciated
Thanks sir Bichur…..your knowledge in much appreciated
I got mine to update and now it shows: 5.01.006……Is that the latest version?
Well I got DestopX 3.2 installed and it is very unstable. Now it won't launch anything nor will it start up at Windows Boot even though I checked that to happen. I uninstalled including all Gadgets etc. and reloaded but it still will not work. I guess I'll wait for v4 which might fix this? Same thing
Meanwhile, WindowBlinds for Windows Vista continues forward. Our goal is to make sure existing WindowBlinds skins designed for Windows XP not only function on Windows Vista but are able to skin the new GUI elements on Vista automatically (by doing things such as taking pieces from one part of the skin and applying it to new controls and such). The betas for that should st
Maybe MS is just toying with us all……Rich Corporations like to do that kind of stuff you know.
OK…answered in another forum…shrewd…but OK
as long as they're doing it right. Yea no doubt, but everyone seems to be saying that MS is dropping the ball with vista…..and at the same time saying that they are developing new software to run on vista.
So………If Vista is really in such bad shape, and Stardock and others predict that the Gold date will be push back……way back apparently, how does this effect the development and deployment of the next generation of Stardock programs? Is this an inappropriate question? <img src="http://images.stardock.com/wc/smiles/Tongue.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmid
I would settle for "stable" Stable is good
You know…….It must be an unearthly task for MS or any software maker to make a flawless product. One that needs no update or patches after its release to the public. I just can’t imagine.
So………If Vista is really in such bad shape, and Stardock and others predict that the Gold date will be push back……way back apparently, how does this effect the development and deployment of the next generation of Stardock programs?
Vista will be the next OS but I'm sure when it's released it won't be ready for prime-time any more than 95 or XP were. (SP1 & SP2 are hints of things to come) Yes, I must agree with you
Windows didn't make Stardock's software possible. That’s really not what I was trying to say….what I was trying to say is that Stardocks programs ARE made to run on windows and from everything I am reading on the new posts all Stardocks new programs are being made to run on Vista…..That’s all that I was saying.
Yeah but if Sun's RISC or IBM's OS2 had won out. All the vendors like Stardock would be making software for that OS. I’m sure that every program around to day would still be around no matter who’s OS would have come out on top. I like windows. I like Vista Beta. I thought Stardock liked Microsoft, being “ Gold Certified Partners” and all. Maybe I
"Windows didn't make Stardock's software possible." Yea…that’s not what I said
"The "Information Age" came about WITH Microsoft not because of Microsoft." I won’t argue with that statement…..but you have to admit that Microsoft has delivered…..just as much as Apple………and more so then all the others…besides Stardock programs are made for Windows