Does Wincustomize need a make over?
So should it have a new make-over? please place comments on what you think.
Tarkus - it's not like the system goes "Oh, subscriber, don't crash". |
| I think that a lot people have come to expect free content on the net and think nothing of the vast amount of work that goes into making a site such as this work. |
| I have a great solution. This should become a member only site. That way we could see if the lack of money is really the cause. |
anyway i think that this site should be fun cause it's all a hobby to us isn't it?


| It's what they have to do to keep their jobs. But feel sorry for them....hell, Jafo says he spends lots of money out of his own pocket to work here. Um, yeah. I'd just like to hear some truth from them |
Oh it's the God's truth, matey.
The difference between thee and me? I persevere with the site issues and do what I volunteered to do....help keep people happy here by treating the recalcitrant and the genuinely decent just the same, chasing upload issues, explaining why Moggy-the-photo wasn't accepted, getting between children pulling hair and spitting, helping to keep Wincustomize.com a [mostly] friendly place to be.
It simply takes a bit longer to do it lately when site issues arise.
You want condescending comments? You want the 'truth'? I find much of your site interaction here obnoxious. There....a bit of 'truth' for you..... much less 'political'....much more 'honest'.....
So...we're not allowed to say 'heavy traffic load'....'not enough money'....etc, because those reasons are only 'excuses'.....and what you want it to be is 'incompetence' because that will be some tacit vindication of your presumed superiority.
In reality I steer clear of T-Man and the crew who are dealing with the site coding.....they don't need interruptions from people, unless there's valid input. When the guys have it sorted we can chat about the urbane, but in the meantime those who care about the site and its community will keep at it in spite of the childish foot-stampings of the spoilt brats.
Oh, sorry.....
What I should have said....PC and all....
"Please be patient"....
#35 Ditto
(I'm a man of few words...
)
| [fervc] I think they need to be more concerned about the technical issue plauging the site, before even worrying about what the site looks like. |
| there are no excuses for the way you and some of your fellow admin treat the people here |
Yes, I must apologise to everyone for giving up my free time for them, for being here now when I should have been in bed two hours ago, for spending all of Sunday moderating when I could have been out in the sunshine, and for helping all those folks who I could have left to sort things out for themselves.
Fortunately most people here don't think like you, it is they whom I give my time for willingly. Still, in every crowd there will always be one ungrateful (comment removed by admin)...
| (comment removed by admin)... |
Wasn't me....
I was busy approving Logons.....funny, that.....
| Is this the time yet for the "If you don't like it, go start your own site" comeback yet? That's just turning things around to take the focus off of the site problems here. |
No, I'm pretty much just ignoring you at this point.
| May I point out that if the website separated the look into a CSS file and left the HTML semantic by using HTML 4.01 strict or XHTML instead of the current tagsoup it would save some bandwidth. As it is currently, this webstie rely heavily on tables, something that quickly adds excess code. Remember how much traffic this site attracts, it quickly adds up. If the look of the site where put into a CSS file it'd not only be less content in the HTML file, but the CSS file would in most cases be cached the first time a user visit the site. Resulting in even less bandwidth usage. I'd think that's be in the interest of both the owners and the users. And then when the appearance is separeted from the content it'd be esier to do makeovers. |
As I mentioned previously, our problem isn't bandwidth. It's database and coding. The site actually doesn't use that much bandwidth because evething is compressed when sent out via a third party plugin we use.
Here are the facts on the ground:
1) Without VOLUNTEERS like Fuzzy Logic and Jafo, this site would cease to exist. WinCustomize's #1 problem is that it lacks human expertise on many areas because it woudl cost too much to employ them. WinCustomize could never even begin to afford Fuzzy and Jafo and the others for their time. So treat them with respect.
2) WC's issue isn't bandwidth.
3)The issue is that when you have a site that gets 3+ million users, all kinds of tiny little database choices and scripting choices that are fine on a smaller site start to fall apart. I can assure you, if SkinBase.org and Skinz.org or Customize.org got even a fraction of the traffic this site gets they would run into the same trouble.
4) deviantART went through the same thing. But, for whatever reason, they are able to get vastly more subscribers which in turn allowed them to hire an entire team of full-time salaried web developers, database administrators, etc. For example, these problems people are running into (including US) we have had to look and look and look to try to find out what the problem is.
5) The specific cause of the problems is that *something* is locking the articles database across our servers. In turn, requests to it pile up and eventually the database starts to go down but not before everything slows to a crawl.
6) Hopefully you've noticed that since 1pm EST the site has been pretty stable.
7) People need to seperate WinCustomize from Stardock. Stardock's position has been consistent, it doesn't need WinCustomize. It could happilly just send people over to deviantART for skins and themes. WC has to sink or swim on its own. Stardock pays the lion's share of the bills.
8) We are working on it. I did very little else this weekend but to try to look into this myself and I'm no database admin or web developer. We are giving it serious attention. These sites are very complicated and what works with 50 people on or 500 people on falls apart when there's 5000 people on sometimes.
9) We would love to have volunteers who can help us with some of these issues. So the CSS template offer, I'll happily accept that help as soon as we get the site working reliably as-is.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.