Frogboy Frogboy

Multiplicity in action

Multiplicity in action

Understanding it is the key..

https://www.stardock.com/products/multiplicity

What is Multiplicity?  It's a program that is designed to multiply the computing power of individuals by allowing them to manage multiple computers as if they were a single computer. 

It works by having N computers and at least N monitors but only 1 keyboard and mouse.  The keyboard and mouse are hooked up to the primary computer and with it, the user then controls each of their computers by sliding the mouse over onto the monitor that is attached to the corresponding computer. So in effect, it's like a multi-monitor PC except that I'm multiplying my overall computing power which in turn improves my productivity.

For power users, Multiplicity is the logical destination to maximize what one can do in a given moment of time.  I say that as someone who, for years, bought SMP machines with the hope of being able to never be interupted in what I was doing by the computer.  OS/2 SMP, NT SMP, etc. never quite did that. I always found myself having to wait for something. This become particularly noticeable when I started tossing more monitors onto a single PC.

Multiplicity eliminates that by letting magnify what I can do by simply tossing more "boxes" under the desk. And let's face it, many people these days have more than one PC.  Sure, at least one of them is probably not state of the art, but it's probably more than enough for reading mail, doing instant messaging, etc.

With Multiplicity, much of its goodness is in its usability (and for those who doubt this, they'll be able to download a demo version because if you're sitting there thinking "What about KVM switches?" or "What about program X?" then the solution is being able to see it for yourself).

It's not just that it provides a universal clipboard between all your machines. It's not just the idea that you can now control a PC and a Mac together.  It's not just that you can copy files and folders between machines with a simple copy and paste action. It's in the details. It's in the UI.

So how would one use Multiplicity? Kris Kwilas, who works at Stardock, has a few examples he can rattle off the top of his head:

Remote desktop, radmin, VNC, and the like are great solutions for bringing the remote desktops to your main PC.

Multiplicity needs another monitor hooked up to secondary PC (up to 6 of them). There's no getting around that for the moment (by design). If you don't have 2 PC's and 2 monitors, it's of no use to you.

Let me give some examples. Until you've used it, imho, you don't even realize that you've been missing something without it. Which is what the trial version will be for!

- Have you upgraded your main PC at home but the other one isn't quite ready to collect dust in the corner of your office? Have you ever emailed yourself a file or burned a CD to get it 6 feet across the desk to another machine?

- Do you have a laptop or a tablet? Are you on the road and when you come back to the office, you want to control everything from one place?

- Would you like to play games on one PC will still being able to surf the web and IM on the other? Or play multiple accounts in a MMO game at once (yes, people do this, I was surprised too!).

- Do you develop software for a living or hobby and need to test it elsewhere? Are you an artist and want to be able to work on something else while a render or filter happen?

- Do you have to test software on multiple configurations? Some people do have a half-dozen mice and keyboards on their desk.

- Do you need more "desktop" to monitor something that can go on a secondary machine while you continue to work uninterrupted in your main one?

As for myself, I use it at work because I do a lot of compiling one one machine and a lot of graphics design on the other and those of you in my shoes know how that can be.  I am thinking of throwing a crap box for a third and having it dedicated to instant messaging and chat and such.

It really came in handy on my recent media tour. I needed to get a bunch of screenshots of GalCiv II. But every time I ALT-ESC'd out of GalCiv, it would crash.  So what I ended up doing is having GalCiv II run on Machine A, hit print screen, then move my mouse to machine B and paste the screenshot into Photopaint.  Then I saved the files, zipped them up and copied them back to Machine A by right clicking on the ZIP file, choosing copy, then moving my mouse over to Machine B where I have my protable hard drive already hooked up, right clicking and choosing paste. And sure, with network shares I could have copied too but compare the productivity difference in just that one trivial example.

I also use it when my son and I play World of Warcraft.  We have two accounts. So he plays and I play. We sit next to each other (killing wolves and bandits together - father and son

Most of the time though I use it in totally seamless mode. That is, just like a multi-monitor setup, I just move my mouse to the other screen and control that box. In our lab there are configs with many machines hooked up to it. It's very handy for testing.

That isn't to say we have dumped our KVM switches.  Our server room uses that and it works great for that.  It's not really designed to compete with that. But there are probably people who use KVM switches who would be better served with Multiplicity just as there are people who might be using VirtualPC who might be better served this way too. There's a lot of potential overlap depending on what you're doing.

Try out Multiplicity for yourself.

108,285 views 68 replies
Reply #51 Top
I would love to buy this, mainly because I just love Stardock products - but I too can't really justify the cost. I've also used Synergy, and have had no real problems to speak of - and I have no problems using network shares for any file copy/paste functions, as I don't do it that often. If only Multiplicity could handle controlling all PCs with 1 monitor, then I'd buy it in a second.

At home, I have 4 PCs - but only 1 good monitor, 1 that's semi-good... and 2 that are just crap. So I use a KVM switch. Monitors are just too expensive to make a KM switcher practical for most people.
Reply #52 Top
This does sound very interesting. Once a Linux version becomes available I would be very likely to use this as my primary machines are Linux based.
Reply #53 Top
As a user with 3 machines around his desk, a KVM switch, 2 monitors, a laptop, remote desktop connections for work and maxivista to use an old computer as secondary monitor for my laptop at work, I understand the different angle of multiplicity and I can see its added value. If a linux client was also available I would buy it without hesistation. As it stands now, it might still be useful for my laptop, but I have to think about that one. Still, an interesting concept.
Reply #54 Top
this is going to be so sweet. i have files on all seven of my computers, and even though i can only hook up six...its gonna help me out sooooo much
Reply #55 Top

Spawnmod If Synergy meets your needs (or whatever program) then by no means, stick with it.  We have used Synergy and other programs extensively and  found it unacceptable. Lost connections, start-up pains, difficult to configure, clipboard could (when it worked) only do text. These are unacceptable things to us.

The same argument could be applied to almost anything. Why buy WindowBlinds when you can hack your uxtheme.dll and use msstyles?  Why get DesktopX when there's Kapsules or whatever? 

Heck, the third party product, LapLink is $129 and it doesn't (on paper) do appreciably more than Remote desktop.  The reason these products are worth what they're worth is because of their execution and key extra features.

Reply #56 Top
Hi,

What about dual monitors? Could I say have computer A (primary) with 2 monitors and computer B (slave 1) with two monitors and additional computers with single monitors? What if just the primary computer has 2 monitors, and all the rest have just one? Are these scenarios workable?

The n computers and n monitors seems to imply that a computer can only have one monitor attached?

Thanks
Reply #57 Top

Yep. You can still have dual monitors

 

Reply #58 Top
Draginol,

Thanks for the reply. After my 2nd Dell 2001fp arrives, I think I'll give multiplicity a try with 2 dual monitor systems.

Thx.
Reply #59 Top
Heys,

Been testing out multiplicity and I am loving it. I always run 2 machines and constantly leaning over to type on the other or control it somehow has always been a pain.

I do have a suggestion tho, being a power gamer who utilizes voice comms, I am sometimes connected to multiple voice servers, 1 on each machine. What was very exciting was that I could press a button on the primary keyboard with my mouse on the secondary and talk using the secondary machine. My suggestion would be the ability to map certain keys to the secondary machine even tho you may be working on the primary. I could also see this ability useful for when I am building webpages. I program on the primary, the secondary views the page, being able to refresh that page without even leaving my primary keyboard would be very useful.

This is a very exciting product. Keep up the good work Stardock
Reply #60 Top
Multiplicity 1.02 released!
Reply #61 Top
Ran into a bug when using Microsoft Intellitype 5.2 on my Wireless Confort Keyboard. the "speed" buttons on the lefthand side of the kb become inop when I run Multiplicity. If I shut it down it works gret.

BTW, great piece of software!!!
Reply #62 Top
MacOS version of Multiplicity is nearly ready.
Reply #63 Top
Hi

I basicly understood how it works. But i still got some questions.

1. Can i use/edit a file on pc2 with pc1, without copying first on pc1? e.g i stored couple of video and doc files on pc2, can i watch and read them directly from pc1, and edit them?

2. Im thinking of getting an new system, and gonna install Vista on it. Will multiplicity run between pc1-Vista and pc2-XP?

Reply #64 Top
1. Can i use/edit a file on pc2 with pc1, without copying first on pc1? e.g i stored couple of video and doc files on pc2, can i watch and read them directly from pc1, and edit them?


Not sure I follow what you mean. You would have to watch/read on whatever system the file is on. You can however copy and paste and watch on either computer. Each computer runs independent of each other. You use one keyboard and one mouse to control both. You will have one controlling PC (master) that will use the existing mouse and keyboard. The second computer (slave) needs no mouse or keyboard. Hope this helps.

Don't know about Vista to XP. I only run XP.

I am extremely happy with Multiplicity and have never had a problem with it.

I believe Multiplicity has a free trial. Try it and see.
Reply #65 Top
@Ordes

I thought it through and came to the conclusion that the interaction without copying probably wont work. Whic is also not that important for me.

What really is important for me, is if it works between a Vista and a XP machine. I didnt buy my second machine yet, and i will only keep the first when i can interact between Xp and Vista. Otherwise there wont be much use to keep the old one. And either i will keep or not my first, im gonna have to shop different for my new system, so cant really test it in advance.


Reply #66 Top
What really is important for me, is if it works between a Vista and a XP machine.
MP works very well Vista to XP, XP to Vista, Vista to Vista, and XP to XP.