Are video games harmful?

Hi all. A friend of mine is doing research for an article lobbying against anti video game laws and he needs more information.

Specifically:

Do you feel video games have stripped you of a life skill? Yes/No. If yes, which of these life skills do you feel you've been stripped of: 

Communication

Self-esteem

Passion - drive or will to do something

Compassion - humanitarian for 'care'

Temperance - or "emotion regulation"

Athleticism

Intellectualism

 

Be candid folks, do not worry whether your answer will provide further ammunition one way or another.

 

Thank you for your time.

15,807 views 27 replies
Reply #1 Top

Just like everything else, gaming should be done in moderation and there is a time/place for everything. Of course there will be people who over play and those are the idiots who give people who just want to have fun for a couple houras a day a bad rep.

Reply #2 Top

No.

Addictions of just about any sort, however, are.

Reply #3 Top

I probably play games more than most on here. Though I'd have to say I wouldn't consider them as having deprived me of any of those. They do eat up time, though. Especially TBS games.

 

:fox:  

Reply #4 Top

Yes to all of the above.. or maybe it was my drug problem..

In conclusion video games lead to drugs.

Reply #5 Top

Not really sure if it's entirely related to videogames, but the internet in general has dulled my compassion quite a lot.

Reply #6 Top

Sounds like one-sided research to me. The question to ask is more or less "Have videogames had a significant impact, in your own life, on: <TOPIC>" It'd help create a better paper in the end because the only values that could be assigned to this these responses are zero (0) and negative one (-1) and so the end result will either be zero or a negative value... there's no sort of positive outcome here and so it doesn't really help the cause. It'd be more likely to be used as ammunition against videogames.

 

Communication:

Video Games generate a social medium for people to interact remotely, and when present in person it continues to provide a topic of discussion.

Self-esteem:

No effect... Not sure why it would.

Passion:

Not even remotely. If I didn't do something that I was supposed to then it wasn't because I chose to play games. I just didn't want to do something. ;)

Compassion:

Videogames open up the world a lot more. I think it improves compassion for other people as you now have a greater view of the world. Basically, you now communicate with people from other parts of the world and so you know (and care) about what is going on in the world.

Temperance:

Videogames can be a great outlet for anger, or a source of it. ;)

Athleticism:

Plenty of "jocks" play videogames. Videogames won't stop you from going outside... Odds are you didn't want to be all that athletic if you are sitting around playing games.

Intellectualism:

I feel that videogames helped me be a little bit smarter. Playing some games opened up my vocabulary and others simply worked my brain.

 

Let's face it, I play videogames, and most of the people that I knew back in High School did not... I'm doing something with my life (well, working towards it with College) and they went nowhere. Sure, the argument is a bit of a fallacy, but it helps prove a point.

Reply #7 Top

of course they are. 

so is watching tv, eating junk food, smoking pot ect ect.       you shouldnt really need a science project to figure this one out.  if you say otherwise you are just lying to yourself.

Reply #8 Top

Quoting will516, reply 7
of course they are. 

so is watching tv, eating junk food, smoking pot ect ect.       you shouldnt really need a science project to figure this one out.  if you say otherwise you are just lying to yourself.
End of will516's quote

No. Not at all. Sure, if you're addicted to them and never do anything else, then they are bad. But so is anything if taken to that extreme.

Videogames are fine. They aren't intrinsically harmful especially if you moderate your time commitment.

Heck, eating junk food is fine, so long as you don't eat too much. 

Reply #9 Top

This is really hard to judge. I mean, if I were to think "Hey, I'm not horribly athletic" would that mean that VG's took that away?  Honestly, only way to know for sure is if I would be more athletic if I wasn't playing games, which is hard to prove.

Reply #10 Top

of course they are.

so is watching tv, eating junk food, smoking pot ect ect.
End of quote

and using the internet... :rolleyes:

Reply #11 Top

Too much water is bad for you.

Reply #12 Top

i would say videogames are harmful  because u could beat someone up with the case  or the cd  plus it would fucking hurt if u were forced to eat it

so they are harmful to the body but not to the mind

Reply #13 Top


Hi all. A friend of mine is doing research for an article lobbying against anti video game laws and he needs more information.

Specifically:

Do you feel video games have stripped you of a life skill? Yes/No. If yes, which of these life skills do you feel you've been stripped of: 

Communication

Self-esteem

Passion - drive or will to do something

Compassion - humanitarian for 'care'

Temperance - or "emotion regulation"

Athleticism

Intellectualism

 

Be candid folks, do not worry whether your answer will provide further ammunition one way or another.

 

Thank you for your time.

End of quote

None of them, really. The only thing I can think of is motivation to do SOMETHING ELSE besides gaming, like maybe sleep early. But I'd say that's true for any sort of addiction problem, not video gaming itself.

Of course, this is completely unscientific, because you're asking us to hypothetically come up with an alternate life where we don't play video games and see if we have any qualities that we otherwise wouldn't. I suppose I WOULD play more sports...since there are no video games.

Reply #14 Top

What what Daikaze? You say you want karma? Pff...

 

Okay...

Reply #15 Top

This is wrong forum btw

Reply #16 Top

Quoting uberShade, reply 11
Too much water is bad for you.
End of uberShade's quote

Bad? Too much water will kill you. :D

Reply #17 Top

Quoting uberShade, reply 11
Too much water is bad for you.
End of uberShade's quote

uberShade speaks truth :thumbsup:

As for that other stuff. No i dont agree, i have played video games my whole life, and alot of them to boot. And i talk alot about how great i am at doing all the things i want such as caring for others and doing so with a cool head. Often i will take those under privillaged kids out to play football and maybe teach them a thing or two.

See what i did thier.

Reply #18 Top

Heck, eating junk food is fine, so long as you don't eat too much. 

End of quote

 

lol lying to yourself.   you can rationalize everything but its better to at least man up to it imo

Reply #19 Top

Quoting will516, reply 7
of course they are. 

so is watching tv, eating junk food, smoking pot ect ect.       you shouldnt really need a science project to figure this one out.  if you say otherwise you are just lying to yourself.
End of will516's quote

Social norms dictate that:

Good: Eternally participating ONLY in social activities, physical activities, and work. What you work as doesn't matter, because it falls within social norms as long as you fit the profile.

Bad: Everything else.

Quoting Zechnophobe, reply 9
This is really hard to judge. I mean, if I were to think "Hey, I'm not horribly athletic" would that mean that VG's took that away?  Honestly, only way to know for sure is if I would be more athletic if I wasn't playing games, which is hard to prove.
End of Zechnophobe's quote

I was personally never athletic. I didn't particularly like any kind of popular sport like Soccer or Basketball. Doing homework would be more fun.

Reply #20 Top

Quoting will516, reply 18




Heck, eating junk food is fine, so long as you don't eat too much. 



 

lol lying to yourself.   you can rationalize everything but its better to at least man up to it imo
End of will516's quote

Are you kidding me? Look, I know this is the internet, so we are all Chuck Norris's with PhD’s in Nanotechnology and Bio-engineering, but in all point of fact:

I have a BMI of somewhere between 18 and 19 (I went to the doctors recently, not something I normally keep up on :P). I can lift more than I weigh (albeit that isn’t some incredible feat if you train at all) and am generally fit. And my mom is a registered dietician (nutritionist) so I eat healthy. That doesn’t mean I never have “junk food” though. You can have “junk food” and be fine, so long as you have it in moderation. Basically, don’t be a moron.

As per OP:

Again, as long as you don’t sit there and play WoW for every waking hour, you can certainly play video games in a healthy manner.

Reply #21 Top

i eat junk food and the hole couch potato hasn't even effected me

Reply #22 Top

Are video games harmful?
End of quote

is it harmful when you lose your 91 win streak to a disconnect? :P

Reply #23 Top

Quoting StAcK3D_ActR, reply 22
is it harmful when you lose your 91 win streak to a disconnect?
End of StAcK3D_ActR's quote

Only to your ego. ;)

Reply #24 Top

Posting it on here and presenting the question in this way introduces a large amount of bias to the sample.  Read up on the importance of a random sample for statistical measurements. I've stuck a few Wikipedia quotes in here for you but the articles there are less clear-cut than what you'll see about sampling in statistics textbooks.

 

1) Samples should not be self-selected.  This is where the respondents are those who choose to respond, such as with an internet poll or answering a forum topic such as this one.  Groups of people with certain traits are more likely to answer than others, causing over-representation of those traits.  For example a forum topic like this will likely draw a disproportionate amount of responses from people who feel strongly about the question.  A random sample requires that you select respondents yourself, such as by picking random phone numbers to call.

Self-selection bias, which is possible whenever the group of people being studied has any form of control over whether to participate. Participants' decision to participate may be correlated with traits that affect the study, making the participants a non-representative sample. For example, people who have strong opinions or substantial knowledge may be more willing to spend time answering a survey than those who do not.
End of quote

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection_bias#Participants

Online and phone-in polls are biased samples because the respondents are self-selected. Those individuals who are highly motivated to respond, typically individuals who have strong opinions, are overrepresented, and individuals that are indifferent or apathetic are less likely to respond. This often leads to a polarization of responses with extreme perspectives being given a disproportionate weight in the summary. As a result, these types of polls are regarded as unscientific.
End of quote

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biased_sample#Examples_of_biased_samples

 

2) Samples should not be selected out of convenience (a certain group of the population that happens to be close at hand / easy to access), because the sample will not be representative of the whole population.  Posting on a forum for a game is convenience sampling and introduces bias because it will only draw responses from a select group -- people who care enough about the games they play to post on the forum.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling_(statistics)#Convenience_sampling

If this survey is also posted on other sites representing other groups of people, then it can be stratified sampling, but it still suffers from the selection bias problem, plus the framing issues that I will mention next.

 

3) Framing of the question.  A poster above me mentioned this.  It has been shown that changing the wording of a question to favor a certain answer can cause a large bias for one answer, and posing it to favor the other answer will flip the responses -- while asking the same thing with neutral wording resulted in an approximately 50/50 split.  Don't remember what they specifically asked so no link for this but maybe you can find it.

Point is, this question asks if video games have harmed the respondent.  It also states that the research is being done to lobby against anti-video-gaming laws.  This is likely to cause respondents to report an answer based on how they feel about the laws, rather than whether they feel games have harmed them.  A better question would be what Diakaze suggested:

The question to ask is more or less "Have videogames had a significant impact, in your own life, on: <TOPIC>"
End of quote

...along with leaving out the fact that the article is going to lobby against anti-video-game laws.

 

4) Even all that aside, the fact that everyone's responses are public, and that you can see others' responses before making your own, will also influence it.  Look up the Asch conformity experiments (psychology thing).

Reply #25 Top

I really hope your friend isn't going to actually use the 'results' of this forum thread.  As cwsault's above post spells out, there is no way that this thread will possibly be taken seriously in a real debate.  If anything, it will weaken your position by making you look silly, uninformed, and amateurish.