Why aren't JU and Mozilla more compatible?

from JoeUser Forums
I'm not super HTML savvy and I can't get links, images, or the quoting part of replies to work using Mozilla. Is it my version (Firefox, 0.9.3) or is Mozilla just not a preferred browser?

Thanks. :)

A.
2,026 views 7 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
I have the same problem. A lot of sites dont support Mozilla. I think Bill Gates is behind this....lol
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
I fired up Firefox .9.3 and don't seem to be having any problems with it.
Multiplicity - Control multiple PCs using one keyboard and mouse
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
It depends on how you do things. If you rely on the JU editor (Which, I'm sorry, I hate) then no, it doesn't appear under FireFox. I found that to be one of the perks of switching to Firefox, actually. If I am not mistaken the editor you see is an ActiveX control that isn't available to non-IE browsers.

Your best bet is just to do the HTML yourself. Five minutes at www.w3schools.com will get you all you need to know. There's a Quick Reference for tags.
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top
I prefer doing HTML than using the WYSIWYG editor. It never works when I try to insert a link. I do wish there were more universal editors though.
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
Another good option is to use MSWord or any other good word processor that allows you to save in HTML format. Just be careful if they stick font tags in, they can look goofy here.
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
There are so many more good things Mozilla offers over IE that I think I'll live with a little JU incompatibility.
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
Thanks, Bakerstreet.