The Daily Kos

A Review

from JoeUser Forums

 Markos Moulitsas Zúniga is the owner of this anger filled blog-site that has gained so much power, kudoes to you for doing do much with so little.

I saw the boy himself On television, a Program called BLOG WARS, it was MOSTLY about Democratic blog sites and how they have had an impact on Democrats and democratic Politics, which is not saying much since we already know Most Democrats are brainless little twits.

 Markos Moulitsas Zúniga is obviously one of those kids that had a tough time in school, most likely a bully much like I was in high school took his lunch money away from him after a simple face slap or just a threat with a glare. The Daily kos, is a propaganda filled, hate filled site that says it just wants to change America, but somehow like Most Democrats never gets around to saying how they will change things, typical of the left these days,  "get Bin Laden" the end, no how, no plan, no nothing." America has to change" The end, no how, no plan, no nothing.

His voice is high pitched sounding well kind of girly, not that I am claiming to know his sexual preferences. His voiced aspirations is to "own a fancy big car, a real big house and make lots of money" gee he almost sounds like a republican.

This site is a dangerous site because it has a huge following, you can find it by listening for the BLEATING OF SHEEP.

Typical of the far-left they want to now invade Pakistan while withdrawing from the Middle east at the same time. They want us to attack Darfur while decrying casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan. Please Democrats from the far left make up your mind, take a position and stand by it!!

12,277 views 25 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
Sites like the DailyKooks show how so much of the democrats base is made up of moonbats.


Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
Island DogJuly 24, 2007 18:16:34


Sites like the DailyKooks show how so much of the democrats base is made up of moonbats.


Dog the truth is the daily kos and the democratic Underground are dangerous hate filled sites, but both have a huge following, I guess if you tell the weak minded what they want to hear you can get a huge following.

BTW jet blue was going to sponser the next Daily Kos convention but the public outcry {meaning possible loss of money, big time} made them withdraw their offer.
Offworld Trading Company
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
BTW jet blue was going to sponser the next Daily Kos convention but the public outcry {meaning possible loss of money, big time} made them withdraw their offer.


Actually they still donated the tickets they had originally promised. They just didn't want a banner for them on the website.

WWW Link
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top

Sites like the DailyKooks show how so much of the democrats base is made up of moonbats.

A lot is made of the kooks on both sides of the aisle, and there is no denying they exist.  The scary part is how the left embrace their kooks.  While the right has not (that I have seen) ostracized their kooks (politics and power and corruption thing), they have not embraced them the way the left has either.

Moulitas is pretty much how you describe him, both in his writings, and his petulance.  I have been aware of his whinings for a couple years now, and normally would be able to dismiss them.  However, when the democrat dwarves run to his side for his blessing, we can no longer ignore him, and must expose them to the light so that all can see who is the hand in the back of the democrat puppets.

Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: davad70Posted: Tuesday, July 24, 2007
BTW jet blue was going to sponser the next Daily Kos convention but the public outcry {meaning possible loss of money, big time} made them withdraw their offer.


Actually they still donated the tickets they had originally promised. They just didn't want a banner for them on the website.

I do believe the WORD "SPONSER"  as in they are not going to SPONSER them anymore COVERED THAT.

Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: Dr GuyPosted: Wednesday, July 25, 2007
Sites like the DailyKooks show how so much of the democrats base is made up of moonbats.

A lot is made of the kooks on both sides of the aisle, and there is no denying they exist. The scary part is how the left embrace their kooks. While the right has not (that I have seen) ostracized their kooks (politics and power and corruption thing), they have not embraced them the way the left has either.
Moulitas is pretty much how you describe him, both in his writings, and his petulance. I have been aware of his whinings for a couple years now, and normally would be able to dismiss them. However, when the democrat dwarves run to his side for his blessing, we can no longer ignore him, and must expose them to the light so that all can see who is the hand in the back of the democrat puppets.

wHICH IS ONE OF THE REASONS i AM WRITING THIS.

Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
I do believe the WORD "SPONSER" as in they are not going to SPONSER them anymore COVERED THAT.


They were "sponsoring" the 2007 event this year by providing 10 airline tickets, which they still provided. So they still sponsered it this year.

I'd love to see a link to a story where Jetblue offered to sponser the 2008 event and then withdrew their sponsership.
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
(Citizen)davad70July 25, 2007 17:23:41


do believe the WORD "SPONSER" as in they are not going to SPONSER them anymore COVERED THAT.


They were "sponsoring" the 2007 event this year by providing 10 airline tickets, which they still provided. So they still sponsered it this year.

I'd love to see a link to a story where Jetblue offered to sponser the 2008 event and then withdrew their sponsership.


It was reported on the news that jet blue withdrew their offer to be the only corporation to sponsor the daily kos. Giving tickets to someone is not, repeat not sponsoring their convention. Banner gone, sponsorship gone. Jet blue caved, because the PUBLIC was outraged at them for being the only major organization to offer sponsorship. Of course none of this matters to you. because I am sure you are an avid fan of the D.U. and daily kos, both hate filled sites. Have another cup of koolaid davad.
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
http://www.plnewsforum.com/index.php/forums/viewreply/124065/

http://newsbusters.org/node/14144


here are two davad, although for the life of me I cannot understand why you could not look them up yourself, but like most far lefties, they want someone else to do the work.
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
sitting here now waiting for a much humbled davad70 to appear and say the dreaded words "you are right moderateman" "i was wrong".


hmmmm hmmm lal lalalalal


still waiting....

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

huh? did I hear something?
was it the sound of someone eating humble pie?

lalalalalal

hummmm hummm hmmmmmmm

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
Jetblue's Sponsorship of the event was consisted of providing 10 tickets for airline travel and having a banner on the website. I already acknowledged the fact that they removed the banner from the website.

Actually they still donated the tickets they had originally promised. They just didn't want a banner for them on the website.


By still providing the tickets, they still sponsored the event. They just didn't want the righty kooks like you and Bill O'Reilly to know about it.

BTW...I have been to the DU website once in my life and visit KOS maybe once a year. Don't make assumptions about what I believe solely based on the fact that disagree with you personally.

here are two davad, although for the life of me I cannot understand why you could not look them up yourself, but like most far lefties, they want someone else to do the work.


What exactly do I believe that makes me a "far lefty"? The fact that I don't believe you understand the concept of what constitutes sponsorship?



Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
Bill O'Reilly


reported it
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
Jetblue's Sponsorship of the event was consisted of providing 10 tickets for airline travel and having a banner on the website. I already acknowledged the fact that they removed the banner from the website.


Actually they still donated the tickets they had originally promised. They just didn't want a banner for them on the website.


By still providing the tickets, they still sponsored the event. They just didn't want the righty kooks like you and Bill O'Reilly to know about it.


yeh right davad, and the page from the daily kos on link two did not really say jet blue withdrew its sponsorship. Do me a favor and send some of that stuff you smoke to little whip she really needs it!

here are two davad, although for the life of me I cannot understand why you could not look them up yourself, but like most far lefties, they want someone else to do the work.


What exactly do I believe that makes me a "far lefty"? The fact that I don't believe you understand the concept of what constitutes sponsorship?


The air you breathe, the words you type, all condemn you to farleftyship. be proud you are a loon davad, don't be ashamed of who you are like colgene who hides his politics. YOU are a left wing nut job, always have been since you started writing here, still are far as I know.
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
danielostJuly 25, 2007 20:59:39


Bill O'Reilly


reported it


to the far left nut-jobs like Davad Bill is Satan Incarnate, nothing he says could be true even if he has pictures, sworn affidavits from the Pope and head Rabbis.
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
The air you breathe, the words you type, all condemn you to farleftyship. be proud you are a loon davad, don't be ashamed of who you are like colgene who hides his politics. YOU are a left wing nut job, always have been since you started writing here, still are far as I know.


So very typical of you. I ask you for examples and all you give is BS.

yeh right davad, and the page from the daily kos on link two did not really say jet blue withdrew its sponsorship


Because all they did was remove a banner on their website. They're still sponsoring it by providing what they were supposed to all along.

What exactly do you think corporate sponsorship entails?
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
(Citizen)davad70July 25, 2007 21:52:57


What exactly do you think corporate sponsorship entails?


it sure ain't 10 air tickets moron.
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
So corporate sponsorship doesn't involve donating services or money? It just involves a banner on a website?
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
Marko - 20 July 2007 11:46 AM

renoman - 20 July 2007 03:54 AM
Raptavio - 17 July 2007 10:56 AM
Wow, I didn’t know Bill O’Reilly had fans who actually took his bloviating seriously.

Oh yea we do take O’Reilly seriously and apparently so does Jet Blue...They pulled their sponsorship...

No they didn’t. Only in O’Reilly world.


dKos:
...



Yeah. They did.

Also from DailyKos:

JetBlue Dumps DailyKos and YearlyKos (my statement)
by pontificator
Fri Jul 20, 2007 at 09:16:20 AM PDT

I am issuing this statement in my own behalf, and NOT on behalf of Yearlykos.

Last night, a representative of JetBlue told us that we could keep their logo on the frontpage of the YearlyKos website, so long as we made it clear that it was an “in-kind” donation. They told us we could announce that fact.

Today, they went back on their word. The representative from JetBlue says he was ordered to tell us to remove the logo.

...



This morning, after reading your post, I checked the YearlyKos website. The Jet Blue logo was there, but in the “In-Kind Sponsors” section.

As of this moment, the Jet Blue logo is ... GONE. ENTIRELY. As in ... NOT THERE.

Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
As of this moment, the Jet Blue logo is ... GONE. ENTIRELY. As in ... NOT THERE.


Imagine that! Just like I said last night.
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top
BTW...I have been to the DU website once in my life and visit KOS maybe once a year. Don't make assumptions about what I believe solely based on the fact that disagree with you personally.


Not a loon like Liz Edwards then - since she is a regular at du.org.
Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: Dr GuyPosted: Thursday, July 26, 2007
BTW...I have been to the DU website once in my life and visit KOS maybe once a year. Don't make assumptions about what I believe solely based on the fact that disagree with you personally.


Not a loon like Liz Edwards then - since she is a regular at du.org.

pfffffffffftttttt!!!!!!!!!!!!! if you can believe his word docguy, Just read more of his writings and comments and draw your own conclusio9n if he is a loon or not.

Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top
Just read more of his writings and comments and draw your own conclusio9n if he is a loon or not.


Again, give some specifics. You can't, because you don't know. You just brand anyone who disagrees with you on anything, or corrects you on something, a loony leftist.
Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: davad70Posted: Thursday, July 26, 2007
Just read more of his writings and comments and draw your own conclusio9n if he is a loon or not.


Again, give some specifics. You can't, because you don't know. You just brand anyone who disagrees with you on anything, or corrects you on something, a loony leftist.

I unlike leftist like you HAVE said I am wrong, have apologized, have corrected false information I have written about, something the left is totally and absolutely incapable of. You know that Jet blue is no longer a sponsor of the DAILY KOS, but yet here you are playing semantics and denying the truth, something the left is very, very capable of. When losing an argument another favorite tactic of lefties like you is quick change the subject. Something I am not going to do. So sit in your chair, knowing your are wrong, pretending you are right, be smug about it, but when the smoke clears, JET BLUE IS NO LONGER SPONSORING THE DAILY KOS CONVENTION, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE YEARLY KOS.

Reply #24 from JoeUser Forums Top
JET BLUE IS NO LONGER SPONSORING THE DAILY KOS


Oh wait, are you talking about Daily Kos, the website, or Yearly Kos, the convention? JET BLUE HAS NEVER SPONSORED DAILY KOS.

Now THAT would be "playing semantics".
Reply #25 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: davad70Posted: Thursday, July 26, 2007
JET BLUE IS NO LONGER SPONSORING THE DAILY KOS


Oh wait, are you talking about Daily Kos, the website, or Yearly Kos, the convention? JET BLUE HAS NEVER SPONSORED DAILY KOS.

Now THAT would be "playing semantics".

and damn good semantics at that. I should have added 'convention' to my statement to make it truthful. Which I will amend right now.