WB And Styler Toolbars

I don't want to offend anyone. Okay?

But what is the freakin deal with the sudden increase in skins that require Styler Tool bar to get the whole effect? If a person has to design or make the toolbar for styler, why not make all that stuff and apply it to WB's? I have seen some great skins, but end up deleting them when I find out I need styler to complete the skin.

Am I missing something? Is it possible to take the bits and pieces from the styler stuff and apply it to the wb skin in SkinStudio?

I thought the idea of using WB was to have ONE program skin it all. I don't want to have to buy something else, and I don't want to add to the load on my PC.

Can someone explain this to me? Granted, I have run into this more on DA, but lately these skins have been showing up here in more frequency.
9,351 views 4 replies
Reply #1 Top
Hey Po, I think it is because Styler toolbar can do more than WB can but I agree it would be nice to have the toolbar icons in the WB for those of us who do not use Styler toolbar.
Reply #2 Top
Styler toolbar can do more than WB

Okay. I have looked at the site for it, but don't understand all it does.
Does it do what WB does? I notice a lot of the skins that have the Styler Toolbar seem to be 'ports'. Are they Styler ports or StyleXP ports? (or are they the same?)
Reply #3 Top
I agree that a wba should be complete. If someone wants t o include something extra, fine, but the wba should skin the customary parts for people who do not have the additional program.
Reply #4 Top
I am equally frustrated as well. They shouldn't be called WB skins since WB can do what Styler can at least from what I can see. And if it can't do it all, it certain does enough.
I don't even bother with skins that say they need Styler, though its shame to miss out on what might be great skins. Of course a bigger sin would be not saying it needs Styler, but I haven't seen that myself yet.