Serendipitous Zhao Serendipitous Zhao

Loose Vs Lose

Loose Vs Lose

It's lose, isn't it? Please tell me if I'm wrong

LOOSE
1. Not fastened, restrained, or contained: loose bricks.
2. Not taut, fixed, or rigid: a loose anchor line; a loose chair leg.
3. Free from confinement or imprisonment; unfettered: criminals loose in the neighborhood; dogs that are loose on the streets.
4. Not tight-fitting or tightly fitted: loose shoes.
5. Not bound, bundled, stapled, or gathered together: loose papers.
6. Not compact or dense in arrangement or structure: loose gravel.
7. Lacking a sense of restraint or responsibility; idle: loose talk.
8. Not formal; relaxed: a loose atmosphere at the club.
9. Lacking conventional moral restraint in sexual behavior.
10. Not literal or exact: a loose translation.
11. Characterized by a free movement of fluids in the body: a loose cough; loose bowels.

LOSE
1. To be unsuccessful in retaining possession of; mislay: He's always losing his car keys.
2. To be deprived of (something one has had): lost her art collection in the fire; lost her job.
3. To be left alone or desolate because of the death of: lost his wife.
4. To be unable to keep alive: a doctor who has lost very few patients.
5. To be unable to keep control or allegiance of: lost his temper at the meeting; is losing supporters by changing his mind.
6. To fail to win; fail in: lost the game; lost the court case.


Now, do you 'lose' or 'loose' when the AI kicks your butt in GalCiv2?


I swear, the number of times I see 'loose' instead of 'lose' makes me think that it must be considered appropriate spelling over in America . . . I just don't see how so many people can use it
38,259 views 37 replies
Reply #26 Top
The sad truth is that often times other countries have better english classes than we do in the USA. Just go to Arkansas.
Reply #27 Top
Personally, I love when poeple write, " ...so I built 3 ship's for defense..."

If you don't see the problem, go play in traffic.
Reply #28 Top
The battle is lost, my intellectual friends. Correct use of the English language still has value though; it has become a sort of secret handshake used among those for whom intelligence actually matters. When you see someone make proper use of a semicolon, or spell the word "embarrassed" with two r's and two s's (and correctly apply the apostrophe in those rare cases where it is actually the proper form for plural), you know you are dealing with a member of the Tribe. Courage, my friends. We are brothers and sisters in arms, and though the world descend into a nighmare of |_3375p34|< and barbaric ignorance, we shall remain immaculately eloquent.
Reply #29 Top
I just wish people would stop using "teh"..

IT'S "THE" YOU MORONIC ILLITERATE IDIOTS!

I am so tired of imbecilic 12-16 yr. olds trying to combine "street" lingo and 133+ speak, and actually wonder why nobody will respond to them. Or that they're more ELITE than me. If ignorance=leet then maybe I'm not elite..

Just my two cents.
Reply #30 Top
Whenever you read online forums, you have to disengage your Grammar Verification Drive if you want to keep your sanity.

That said, I will admit that certain, senseless phrases, like "In regards to ...." and ... "In terms of ...." really do annoy the hell out of me at times.

The first phrase annoys me because it's so "accepted" (you even see it in textbooks, documentaries, business memos, etc.), even though the correct phrase has nothing to do with "regards" (well wishes you send to another.) "In regard to ..." is the correct phrase (notice the singular "regard"), with "As regards ... " being the only correct use of the word "regards" in this context.

The second phrase annoys me because the context in which the phrase is used (as well as the singular/plural nature of the subject) all too often shows very clearly how inept the phrase is; in truth, most people really mean to say "With respect to ... " not ... "In terms of ..." Ex: "In terms of the ship designer, the game is awesome."

How people fail to notice the senseless things they're saying and writing I'll never know.

Anyway ....

:::: disengaging Grammar Verification Drive ::::




Reply #31 Top
I could of let it go, but it's the start of a slippery slope in to text-speak.


You're probably aware that stems from the usage of the contraction could've which sounds the same as could of.
Reply #32 Top
Seriously, there's nothing wrong with leetspeak.

1 5p34|< 133t.

I speak perfectly fine British English.

The two are not mutually exclusive. It all depends on the circumstance. When in forums (fora), do as the forumnites do.
Reply #33 Top
this may help you remember

loose = old pants
lose = when said pants fall off in public

see not very hard at all
Reply #34 Top
How about its and it's while you're (and your) at it? It's the apostrophe abuse that gets (get's) me. People just think they need to be thrown in wherever there's an s at the end..


i really wan't to know what two words people think they are contracting sometimes.
Reply #35 Top
forums (fora, if you want


I believe the proper form would be "fori"

Let's talk about affect/effect in tomorrow's english lesson


Or Assure/Ensure/Insure

"When I went to college I could not spell Ingeneur - Now I are one"
Reply #36 Top
Then there's things like Americanized spellings vs. British spellings. Armor vs Armour. Color vs Colour.
Reply #37 Top
And 'ae' . . . haemoglobin vs hemoglobin

And 'oe' . . . oesophagus vs esophagus

I like the ae/oe thing, it makes words look cooler . . .