"What you think of it is irrelevant - if you really are a Christian. The message of the scriptures, as I've amply demonstrated, is that there is no salvation without Baptism. You think God cares what you like or dislike?" And what you think of it is irrelevant - if you are wrong. But then, you're of such arrogance that I guess you must be right, eh? Even when you're wrong, eh? I have to admit though I was wrong when I said that KFC wo
messybuu
I agree. True, I'm no longer into biology as I was as a wee lad in high school (because dissecting animals depresses me), but I see the certainty with which evolutionists speak of evolution as nothing more than faith that the evolutionist's interpretation of the fossil record is correct. And the way some evolutionists will act as though creationists don't even believe in electricity stinks of a religious zeal. I know organisms can mutate, but I see not
I was thinking that maybe I would be banned for what admittedly is a trollish article. But I guess I was wrong.
"Simon was the Penultimate, tongue-speaking, foot-stomping, slain-in-the-spirit Pentacostal for five years, and that was after He spent FOUR years as a Fire-Breathing Street Evangelist, accosting unsuspecting sinners wherever He could find them and telling them ALL about their condemned asses. One poor sap was cowed, teary eyed, into a corner after being the victim of His evangelistic derision for.....wearing a crucifix as an earring. (I'll leave Him t
"MySpace is 'where the kids are'.... like chatrooms, etc." It seems like the Internet is the actual problem. "Satan's Advocate....if you were the parent of a teen who had been preyed upon and harmed by a filthy slime bag (as I am), you'd see the stranger danger, predator peril in a whole different light." And if my son died in Iraq, I probably would see the whole war in a different light. Doesn't make Cindy Sheehan right thou
"People socialised and made friends long before the advent of the internet and sites like MySpace, so the reasoning/excuse that MySpace is a valuable social network is pathetic to say the least." And before email was the telephone, the letter, talking, etc.. Does that mean email isn't valuable for communication? "It may have started out innocently enough, but with teens using it to flaunt themseves, and sickos to prey upon them, it ha
Many people seem to dislike the Get a Mac commercials that Apple has made. They say that the character who represents the Mac looks like a smug and smelly bastard. I'll admit that Mac users are a bit smug, but smelly? HA! We are too OCD and anal-retentive to be dirty! And sure, we do believe that Macs are superior platforms to PC, but most of us know PCs have their place. Even the Mac guy admits that PCs are better for certain tasks in a commercial. I think if Apple were to make a commercial
Tons of MySpace haters! Sure, there's lots of crap on MySpace (and I'm sick and tired of those True ads!), but like any online community, it does have its benefits. For me, it's allowing me to share a side of me people usually won't see in a social atmosphere. And I've met two of my best friends from MySpace who I probably wouldn't have met otherwise even though we go to the same church and everything.
"If it wasn't for BSD unix Apple would have little room to talk." And if it wasn't for the NT kernel Microsoft would have little room to talk either.
"Out of curiosity.....what happens when you hit and release the "Reset" key and then press the "Ctrl" and "B" key simultaneously ?" I remember that trick. It was so funny. In my computer class in high school, when there was a substitute, we did that on all the machines. I so want to take out my old Mac from the closet now!
"I've asked once before, and it's worth asking again: why does disrespect for your religious ideas shown (or imagined) 'steam' you so much?" Perhaps you are one of the few dozen people in the world who does not take any offense when shown disrespect in any verbal way whatsoever?
The way I see it, works matter as much as faith does. However, they alone won't save us nor would they be anything but (as the Bible puts it) filthy menstrual rags if not for Christ's redeeming sacrifice. I consider myself a "grace only" Christian because we humans can't save ourselves, and it is the sacrifice that saves us, but with our works and with our faith, we either accept or reject the gift.
Indeed. I have an issue trusting fellow Christians because there are too many Christians out there who try to market Christianity rather than live it. I hear too much about numbers from evangelists. Sure, the more people who accept Christ, the better, but if they all accept Christ rashly and later apostatize when they fall from the euphoria, it was absolutely pointless. Better to not convert anybody but help one Christian become a better Christian than
I think it's funny how the alternative to the iPod looks like a cheap rip-off of an iPod. I don't think a company can make a decent competitor to the iPod. It's going to take a collaborative effort by many companies to create one series of MP3 players integrated well into one music service like the iPod+iTunes combination. I doubt that'll happen as each company thinks it can beat the iPod on its own. "About 4 or 5 years ago, I bo
"OS X is virus vulnerable...just people who make viruses have no point in making a virus for it. It would be like spraying a special pesticide to kill caterpillars when the field is being torn up Locusts that there are 90% more of than caterpillars." Every system is susceptible to viruses. Nonetheless, OS X is still more secure than Windows (and not just because of its userbase). "I always thought a Personal Computer was just that, a
LOL Served! I feel that shame is the best way to punish somebody. Reminds me of this, which I was going to post a blog of, but I guess I'll just link it on here: http://www.evanwashere.com/StolenSidekick/
I think Stardock should make a version of Galactic Civilizations for OS X. Sure, it'd cost them more money than it'd make them, but 1) they'd gain a bigger marketshare and 2) they'd gain respect. But will it be profitable for them? As for Mac clones, Apple's done that before. It didn't work that well. Apple is doing pretty well now with their hardware anyway. If you compare them to the entire PC industry (acting as though all PC makers are one
I just realized something. How could the Mac be a slacker if Macs are more expensive than PCs? Would a slacker be able to afford the outrageous premium? As one person said, Macs will be more expensive, especially if you're migrating from Windows and need to purchase Office and whatnot. However, if I were to migrate back to Windows, I'd also have to purchase Windows XP Professional (I'm not just going to use Home), Office 2003 Professional, and
Sandisk captures the mindset of many people well in their iDon't campaign well. People hate Apple so much they'll choose inferior products, pathetic plagiarisms of Apple's superior designs, just to feel cool. After all, by using Windows and products made exclusively for Windows, they can say, "I'm free! I'm not forced to use a certain software (except Windows) or hardware (except Intel or AMD)! I have complete control (except for the DRMs)." If their critici
Kias are probably cheaper than Ford hybrids, but some people actually prefer Ford hybrids to Kias and might even argue it's more cost-effective. Unless you compare the two computers feature-to-feature (including FireWire, webcam, and whatever else I take for granted on Macs), as well as the fact that it could run both Windows and OS X, then one might as well say criticize Alienware computers for not being as cheap as eMachines. Is that comparing two co
Not so. Rightly or wrongly, the same people who think you less intelligent for being a creationist Christian are the same people who laugh at the gullible people who 'believe' the Da Vinci code. You seem to think that the DVC is a tool of atheism and unbelief, whereas it is simply a work of fiction - the purpose of which was to m
You can't reason with such people. It's quite futile. There is not a reasonable bone in their body. All they care about is doing what "feels" right. It feels right to attack Christianity 'cause Christianity is the dominant religion in the US and televangelists are quite irritating. Meanwhile, Muslims are seen as the underdog. Even the ones who kill innocent people in the name of Allah.
Perhaps I'm an optimist, but I don't think that people are actually being fooled that the book is historically accurate. I think that the people who take it seriously are simply the people already looking for another excuse to deny Christianity. It's funny actually. The same people who would think me less intelligent for being a Christian (a creationist Christian for that matter!) are learning history from a book that's as historically accurate
I haven't read the book because it sounds like a badly written book. Perhaps I'm a snob, but any book that specializes in anticlimactic endings (unless the blogger described the ending wrongly) and hundreds of tiny chapters is not worth my time. Such books read as though they were written specifically to be made into a movie, so just watch the film!
As an Apple lover, I say Steve Jobs is a perfect example of how a single CEO can save a dying company and make it relevant again. I often see on Mac blogs the worry over what'll happen to Apple once he retires.