I finally paid attention to that commercial to see Brooke Burke, and I must say... this is the greatest commercial ever! Not only does it have Brooke Burke, a BABE, but it also has Vida Guerra, another babe! It's like BABES TIMES TWO! That's not even counting all the other babes! This commercial receives my highest rating: 5/5!
I'm gay so my opinon kind of overules yours. (I don't mean to offend FYI) Is it better to support people who consider you as a sin or people who at LEAST say they will accept you? What's funny is that Democrats won't even accept you anymore than Republicans. If they do, then why is it that in many D
But you can't just make it 'not' covered by Medicare. Medicare exists to help people. Sometimes it's necessary to save the life of the mother. Should a woman and her potential child die because she's too poor to afford the abortion? Not in my country (or at least I hope not; the current government seems to have other ideas, but t
Because it's a waste of the state's funds. In Australia at least abortions are covered by Medicare, so women who get them can get a refund of some sort for the procedure. It's much cheaper (and costs other Australians nothing) to just buy a condom, so having an abortion is wasteful and irresponsible. And then you've got the costs if they inflict mental damage on themselves
2: Those who believe abortion on demand is wrong, but see legitimate medical justifications for it. (against "abortion on demand", but not really "anti abortion). What makes abortion wrong? <TD class="
My biggest pet peeve is pandering. Pandering is such a slimy tactic, which explains why politicians do it all the time! John “War Criminal” Kerry even made it a cornerstone of his presidential campaign during the 2004 election! What is pandering? Pandering, of course, is defined in the dictionary.com as “arranging for sexual partners for others.” It’s a very disgusting act, and only the most pernicious dare cond
Drmiller had DrGuy on his ignore list and he visited Messy's blog where messy had responded to a comment made by drguy, drmiller wouldn't be able to see the comment that drguy made but he would be able to see the comment that messy made in response. Exactly! It's why ignore never worked when people igno
Actually, I only ignore a few people (not the most radical of the leftist, just the crazies). And it works. I dont read their comments, and when others comment on their comments, that is fine. I dont blacklist or delete (unless the comment is racist or otherwise bigotted). I'm referrin
I try not to involve myself in drama as much, but I have something important to say. Some say that blacklisting others isn’t effective, and an ignore feature is needed. However, if the blacklist feature isn’t working, then ignoring won’t either. Why? I’ll explain with an anecdote from the past! When I was HailStorm, the ultimate existence of evil, on MSN Chat, I had many enemies. Many people would ignore me when I annoyed them. That stopped me from annoying the
Words on online forums do not hurt unless one allows them to hurt.
So, Canada doesn't object to us shooting a missle over their airspace because out of concern for debris killing their citizens, but because they just don't want the US to "violate" their airspace?
Did you just discovered about Mac? You're probably a PC noob. I'm a Mac Hater why because I knew what Mac can't do already for 6 years from now with I was 12 years old. I'm no geek ok, just smart of buying products I've used a PC since I was in junior high, so if I'm but a high school freshman, then you
not the first of the founder's provision you've found fault with...probably not the last. nor is likely to tbe the last legal vs moral conflict you'll encounter. What was the first one with which I found fault? <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-T
if you truly believe that, you're in need of some serious moral compass re-alignment. silence in the furtherance of deception is just as dishonest as speaking in the furtherance of deception. When you put it that way, I'd have no respect for any person who'd ever plead the fifth. I can't believe
As a Mac user, I have both praises and complaints for both the PC and the Mac. Although I do prefer the Mac, I do like PCs too, and I do see why somebody would prefer them.
It's funny how such a derogatory word has become such a casual term, but it's not the first time I've seen it. It's the same with gay and retarded (which I both use often to describe both the gay and the retarded crap that makes life gay). I didn't like it before, but now I use it too!
it is funny to see someone who professes to hate hypocrisy above all other failings earnestly defending such a hypocritical justification for indulging in blatant hypocrisy. It would be hypocritical if Bush said he had never used drugs, but he's not. He's not saying anything. How is silence in the inter
How about a public "come clean and admit he was wrong" and tell the youth not to make the mistakes he made. Perhaps he thinks it'll do more damage than good.
Wow! I don't know why my smileys are green, but it's great that they are! It means I'm unique! Hmm... ok now I gotta ask before I start a blog, stuff that I write in my personal blog that has nothing to do with Windows apps and stuff
I find it interesting, though, that the accusations of being a 'bad' Buddhist are being leveled at me by someone who's not even a practicing Buddhist. I've noticed that it usually is like that, or it's by some self-righteous person who wants to use others as stepping stones up the tower of arrogance. Wh
As long as somebody follows the fundamentals of whatever they claim to be, then I'll accept their sincerity. However, there are actually people who claim to be one thing, and don't really show any signs of it. I read this one response on a Christian site from a Christian who said that the Bible is "just a book written thousands of years ago," "should be taken with a grain of salt," and should not be believed, "word for word." I doubt that person's sinc
That is what the Blog started about. Replies got into other things. The shame is that Bush can never admits when he has made an error. He just changes the reason why he is correct. This time it to protect the children from knowing that the President of U.S. was a drug user. Guess what- they all know it. What they do not see is th
This would never make it through the house though, as the Democrats would take it as an attack on Democrats everywhere. Besides, they'd much rather do things with good intentions and no focus, because after all, "the means justifies the ends." Man Ann Coulter sure needs time on the couch, and not with her legs spread for
: : Thanks, KarmaGirl! Hearing me speak these things wouldn't help much though, as I do my best to keep it a secret.
I'd like to see those skits done, but only if SNL does them justice (the last Michael Jackson skit I saw on there wasn't funny at all! How could somebody screw that up? It's Michael Jackson!). It's a shame that Saturday Night Live has gotten so bad lately (All That!'s funnier!). I do hope they get better soon, because I want to watch it again, because Tina Fey is hot!
JoeUser Forums