He's clearly trolling to try and get a reaction - the easiest way to get rid of him is to ignore him. It's obvious he's trolling and that he's not very good at it - a good troll would never make it quite so obvious, and no normal person would ever react/post the way he has on this topic as it's obviously completely irrational and bordering on mental illness.
Sins Forums
No, it comes down to you instisting that one useful unit which you find hard to beat makes the [I]entire game[/I] unbalanced. The ship is getting mildly nerfed, the fundamental ability of it remains, and it will still require the same tactics to beat. And it's very easy to assume you're being stubborn and not listening when you barely respond to people's advice, and when you do, you insist that nothing will work and the unit can't be beaten. I don't even know why I'm
Sins Forums
Apricotslice, you've completely missed the point. People aren't moaning about modding the game to have fun. You're free to do that of course. People are annoyed because this person has announced that the game is broken because his one tactic gets beaten and he can't win by clicking the 'build' button a lot. If you look at his posting history almost all his threads are basically blaming the devs for releasing a broken piece of crap. That's massively disrespectful to
Strange, UT3 was well-received by the gaming press. The PC version averages at 84% on GameRankings. Over a million units of the game have been sold, more than half of those on PC's. 1.2 was released in Feb this year. I have to say, I really don't understand what the original poster is on about. Pretty much every point you make is either inaccurate or based on pure speculation. Sure, the Linux delay may be down to involement from Microsoft. But to say the game has been
Hilarious! Someone claiming that games somehow managed to get viruses on your pc! And then they admit to using Limewire! Tell your sister and her raggedy-ass boyfriend to get the hell off your pc and to stop d/ling dangerous p2p programs and then trying to shift the blame on to you. I can't believe they're trying to claim it was games wot did it! Better yet get that job and buy your own pc so no-one else can get their grubby hands on it.
[quote]Well, still buying this game Edit: While I do wish game company's would follow SD/IC example, however, didn't someone already mention that not everyone has an internet connection? Which mean's not everyone would be able to download a game, and if there is no disk available, well they are screwed then.[/quote] yes and with this game, with no internet connection you can't even play the single player game. That's the entire point of this thread?
[quote]Comparing piracy to stealing a physical item is a horrible comparasion.Piracy is more like finding something you need (headphones, a tool, ect) on the ground, but wouldn't pay for in a store. Basically, most people who pirate things would never have bought them. Most people I know pirate music. Do they go screaming down the halls "YOUR HURTING THE ARTISTS!!"? There's 2 types of arguments for piracy on the Internet.Piracy is good and the current business model for buying games is outdated.
[quote][B]MINI-DUMPS are the main issue[/B]. State that it will be a long game. pirates can be turned off. TEC has the only good SW. and i mainly just want the mini-dump fixed (maybe a fastest option but mini-dump first) yes i know it is a bug causing the mini-dump but fix that[/quote] It sounds like massive dumps are the main issue for Feweh.
[quote]every reviewer has a right to their opinion, but if you are going to be reviewing games then you darn sure at least ought to get your facts straight... The combat is not at all like Warcraft, I have no idea where is comment about that comes from. The LAST thing I thought of was Warcraft. It is actually closer to something like Warhammer 40k: Dawn of War, because this game is also focused on capturing and holding "resource" points. It is also about getting units throug
[quote]Hey guys! I bought Call of Duty 4 expecting an exciting puzzle game, and it's not even like Bejeweled! Can I make veiled uninformed attacks of the game on the forums because I didn't read the box, the return policy for Best Buy, or any number of reviews of the game while simultaneously expecting someone to reward me by buying the game from me?[/quote] :LOL: Owned!
[quote]Quote (Citizen)RabidPotatoeJanuary 29, 2007 12:30:01Reply #19[/quote] 1 - Not true, you're thinking of the [I]Kesselschlacht[/I], or "cauldron battle", developed by the Prussians in the lead up to the war of 1870, an infantry warfare tactic based on maneuver and envelopment. [I]Blitzkrieg can be defined as defeating the enemy by means of a strategic envelopment [B]executed by mechanized forces, with overwhelming air-support[/B], leading to operational collapse.[/I] <
GalCiv2 Forums