Quality of Wallpapers declining

I don't know about you, but a month back, our wallpaper section was covered in quality wallpapers with many ranking of 7 or higher.

This morning, as I was scrolling through to look for a good wallpaper...I find out instead of the usual 7, 8, and 9 rankings..I find a bunch of 4s, 5s, and 6s, and some even lower.

I can't help but feel a bit annoyed at this. I guess I'm just used to seeing shoggot moderate off any wallpaper that got the score of a 7 or lower. (shog owns as someone has once said)

I don't know what we can do about it. But I will like to bring this up. Many people aren't priviledged to having dsl or anything of the sort. Loading would be a problem...and if someone finds it rather expensive loading all these wallpapers ranked 4 and 5s..and maybe even lower..chances are..they might not return.

Just a thought..
2,888 views 6 replies
Reply #1 Top
Elfie - In your profile you can set a rating below which you won't see any postings...
Reply #2 Top
I know that, David
Reply #4 Top
how'd you know that, craeonics?
Reply #5 Top
We could do a 'Shog' and upset a lot of people, but I'm kinda proud of the way that walls that I would never use in a pink fit myself, are being let through because of the understanding that there is more than one 'personal taste' out there.
There is quite a good mix at the moment.
Sometimes it is advantageous to approve a wall so that public comment will convince an artist to lift his game a bit more.
Rejection notices are often construed as 'one man's opinion', and ignored.
A legitimate public low score, coupled with a flood of suggestions on ways to improve something may convince the artist of the 'error of his ways'...
Reply #6 Top
all right. Thanks, jafo