Wallpaper section rant

berzerka....I guess the simplest answer comes down to quality and standards of moderation. Remembering back to the days of skinz.org....the vast majority of walls were rejected in order to keep those that remained of reasonably 'high' standard.
As skinz.org was, WinCustomize is primarily a skinning site, with Wallpapers included as an addendum, not as the prime directive.
There are squillions of Wallpaper sites out there, but only a very small handfull of skin sites, which is where WinCusto's focus lies...

are u implying that my wallpapers are of low quality?

here, tell me whehter u think these pics should have been rejected........


http://filez.uk.co/~berzerka/desktop7.jpg
http://filez.uk.co/~berzerka/desktop9.jpg

Well....I finally managed to find them....and I personally didn't moderate those, but would have.
Simple photos of pretty faces in bluish greys don't require a great deal of expertise to replicate. Were the photos taken by yourself and submitted to a photo-art collection, maybe the response would be different. However, pretty girls they are, successful wallpapers?, maybe not....

berzerka, I do not know what is going on with the moderation, but I do have a suggestion, you may want to look at submitting to www.desktopgirls.com for that is a site that specialized in walls of the female subject mater. ANd yes I agree the woman are very attractive.

What Jafo said.

just don't use http when you don't want the link working

www.filez.uk.co/berzerka/desktop7.jpg

yes, anyone can get pretty girls, but making a decent wallpaper out of em does take skill