Mac?

I've played Sins with a laptop with vista, I was curious if I would still be able to play if I purchased a Mac. I'm not meaning to start a Mac vs. Pc thread, i'm just curious.

10,306 views 16 replies
Reply #1 Top

I play on a Mac, with Windows XP installed thru boot-camp. 

Mac are 100% better than PCs! 

 

Hi I'm a mac, and I'm a PC! 

PC: **** you Mac! 

haha 

Reply #2 Top

Well, no.  Not nativley and not supported.  On the other hand you could attempt to run the game in something like CrossOver or DARWINE.  Saying that you'd need Impulse running which requires .net 2 to run which is often a none starter.

But theoretically a retail release version might be A-Ok.   Check the appdb over at winehq to see what the compatibility is like.

Reply #3 Top

Yes it runs on Mac perfectly...

I got MacBook Pro and have been playing Sins on it since Beta - that is more than one year ago...

Of course, you can NOT run it on OS X - but! - OS X has got lovely feature called BOOT CAMP which allows you to dual boot to Windows (XP or Vista or even Win7!)

So go for it!

You wont have any problem at all... In fact I will go that far and say it will run better on your Mac than on equivalent PC  :)

Reply #4 Top

not to mention, better graphics...:grin:

Reply #5 Top

I don't like MACs.  I build my own PCs and have the same speed for half the $$$.

Reply #6 Top

i run it on a mac book pro with all the graphics turned on. it beats my vista pc pretty bad. which sux coz my vista had a better graphics card and twice the RAM.

 

bootcamp-xp pro!

Reply #7 Top

Quoting sangamc, reply 6
i run it on a mac book pro with all the graphics turned on. it beats my vista pc pretty bad. which sux coz my vista had a better graphics card and twice the RAM.

 

bootcamp-xp pro!
End of sangamc's quote

Yap :)

I am running bootcamp-xp pro too and it beats my old PC of little bit better specs hands down...

Its insane!

Love it hehe :p

Reply #8 Top

Im running on a Mac with a 800Mhz CPU and a  16MB graphics card  and  I get far better performance  than running it on my  3.8 Ghz  Quad core  with  1700 MB nvidia Card.

Reply #9 Top

Something worth pointing out.  BootCamp does require a copy of Windows which will add $$$ on to your quest.  Both of my suggestions are free (one is free as in beer the other has a time limited demo).  

Ohh and no, the OEM version that came with your clapped out old Dell won't do... unless you know which sized sledgehammer to use on WGA.

Reply #10 Top

Quoting CreditSuisse, reply 1


Mac are 100% better than PCs! 
End of CreditSuisse's quote

 

Mac are betta than PC 100% duuuuuuuur.   Mac,  what an overpriced piece of poopoo

Reply #11 Top

with mac you get what you pay for DOH!!

 

i just installed the volumetric explosions and bailknights improved graphical mod on both my vista pc at work and my macbook pro XP, and guess which one rocks the hardest ......

 

 

bootcamp-xp. i <3 it!

Reply #12 Top

Hey, has anyone tried to run Sins in a Windows XP Emulator on their Mac?   I know it probably wouldn't work, but I suspect some enterprising fellow has tried it.   =)

Reply #13 Top

yes i have tried running it on my imac in both parallels and vmware and it blows chunks. sadly my imac is tiger so i cant run bootcamp. and use my 20inch display. the performance on the macbook pro is more than satisfacotry even on huge maps with massive fleets, full graphics and mods!

 

Reply #14 Top

the performance on the macbook pro is more than satisfacotry even on huge maps with massive fleets, full graphics and mods!
End of quote

A macbook pro running bootcamp?  Or Parallels or VMWare?  Those are the two best emulators I'm aware of as well.  I just don't really want a bootcamp partition on my mac right now....they are annoying.  I might get around to it eventually, but if a Mac Pro is powerful enough to run Sins in an Emulator, I would give it a try.   =)

Thanks for the feedback, btw!

Reply #15 Top

the problem with the parallels and vmware virtual machines is the graphics support. parallels doesnt do a good job with directx and vmware isnt much better. it makes sense that they would struggle because there is overhead from running xp in a VM that sits on top of OSx. my bootcamp partition is 6 GB which is enough for the xp install and 2 games. (i also play homeworld 2 alot) so there isnt much of an impact on hard drive space.

Reply #16 Top

the problem with the parallels and vmware virtual machines is the graphics support. parallels doesnt do a good job with directx and vmware isnt much better. it makes sense that they would struggle because there is overhead from running xp in a VM that sits on top of OSx. my bootcamp partition is 6 GB which is enough for the xp install and 2 games. (i also play homeworld 2 alot) so there isnt much of an impact on hard drive space.
End of quote

Yeeesssss......that is why I was asking if anyone had tried an emulator with good results.  So you in fact haven't had good results on an emulator, because I was asking about Emulators.  Thanks!  That is all I needed to know.   (I already know running an Intel based MAC as a Wintel box works great, this wasn't my question.)