A hint for The Washington Post circulation department

I see notes on sites from the DC area that tell me that, yet again, The Washington Post is having to worry about declining circulation numbers.  Gee, really?  I would never have expected that { read that with dripping sarcasm }.

A couple of thoughts come to mind on how to resolve the problem for The {Washington} Post.

Besides the obvious, which is to look at the editorial content and relatively obvious liberal bias that shows up in the paper, there's an even bigger and simpler reason for some of that declining readership -- it's called 'old news' and it is exactly what you get when you buy The Washington Post either on the news stands or especially via home delivery.

Where I live, which isn't that far from The Post's back yard and their main printing plants, if I subscribe for home delivery I'm guaranteed to get yesterday's news as the knuckleheads at The Post print up their early edition and rush me a copy of the paper.  Rushed as in printed up around 10PM -- so it doesn't even include the headlines that were prominent on the 10PM news on the local FOX affiliate -- and then dropped in my yard at approximately 11PM, or perhaps as late as 1AM the next morning.  The next morning being the morning that I should be seeing the paper arrive at say 4AM, with the news headlines from the national wires and the local sports scores from all of the games from the prior day.

What seems to be escaping the publishers of The Post is that if they send me a paper that just says 'late game' for every game that was played the day prior, their Sports section is basically useless.  If they send me a paper that neglects to tell me that a bridge fell in Minnesota the day before when that same news was all over the headlines every where else then again the paper is useless.

The Post is lucky enough that Wall Street operates on 'banker's hours' and that the business news from the previous day is normally wrapped up nice and neatly by approximately 9pm when the earliest edition of the paper is being printed up, but outside of that news, just about everything else that they print in those early editions is incredibly stale.

I gave up home delivery of The Post years ago.  Not that I care that much for their biased content, but, I would probably subscribe for at least Sunday home delivery if the paper wasn't filled with yesterday's news.  I would fairly certainly subscribe for full home delivery if I could be assured of getting current Sports news in it.  For the relatively small price for the daily edition, it would be worth it to me to have the paper around to read the comics, the Sports and the business news while ignoring most of the rest of it.

Unfortunately it seems that the people at The Post are more concerned with getting me a copy of their product fast, rather than timely, and that just leaves me unwilling to spend money on their product at all.

8,019 views 7 replies
Reply #1 Top

I should mention that a good friend has found the same issues with getting early editions of The Post and he too has opted to drop his support of The Post.

Also, I should mention that another reason that I did stop getting The Post is that they just couldn't keep from tinkering with the comics that they carry and that is one of the biggest attractions in the paper for me.  Once they started tinkering with things too much, I went online and found yearly e-mail subscriptions that cost me far less than what a yearly subscription to The Post does and have the advantage of offering me *every* comic strip I could ever hope to want to read, not just the ones that the editor for the Style and Arts section has decided that I should be interested in.

Reply #2 Top
The San Fran Freako Chronicle circulation is also in the shitter terp, but for slightly different reasons, it is sooooooooooo farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr leftttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt that even the leftttttt will not read it any more.
Reply #3 Top

The San Fran Freako Chronicle circulation is also in the shitter terp, but for slightly different reasons, it is sooooooooooo farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr leftttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt that even the leftttttt will not read it any more.

You mean they are targetting the Move-on.org crowd?  Or perhaps Sheehan?

Ouch.

Reply #4 Top

I think you nailed it on the head.  Yesterday's news.  It use to be I would stay up for the late news to catch the scores and the weather.  Now I dont. If I want the weather or the latest scores, I check the internet.  At my convenience.

Growing up in California, I like to read the evening paper.  Why?  Because they would have the early game scores from the east coast games.  But that was 40 years ago.

Beyond their bias, the internet is killing the brick and mortar papers.  They cant keep up!  20 years ago it was 24 hour news channels, but even those now are being supplanted by the instantaneous nature of the Internet.  ANd you dont have to wade through  Ads or commercials.

Reply #5 Top

the Internet. ANd you dont have to wade through Ads or commercials.

Uh, I'm not that sure about not having to wade through ads or commercials.  I guess you don't catch commercials most of the time, but there are still plenty of ads on most news sites.  Pop-ups and the like, and banner ads, etc.  Doesn't mean that you don't get to ignore them and zoom right into the actual news, but there's plenty of ads out there.

Reply #6 Top

Pop-ups and the like, and banner ads, etc.

poppa Stoppa!

Reply #7 Top
Pop-ups and the like, and banner ads, etc.

poppa Stoppa!


add where killa