google does it doggie style
shame on you, google. shame. shame. shame. ;)
http://www.loserturdmafia.com/
from 
JoeUser Forums
JoeUser Forums
i recently read an article stating that one may judge one's blog on the "type" of "referrals" one gets.
i had been given to idly wondering why my article about my husbands' dog (that at the time sunk like a stone and should have) was the consistent front runner in my "top articles" list.
i now understand that my error was my, ahem, insertion of the phrase "decades of indiscriminate dog sex" to describe the reason why our dog was such an unidentifiable "breed".
instead of the resulting fellow animals lovers (eww, not THAT kind of lover) that i had hoped to incite pleasant social intercourse with ...
... I NOW HAVE A BLOG FULL OF NASTY, PERVY, SCARY LITTLE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO GET DOWN WITH THEIR HOUND !
eww. dirty.
i wonder how angry they get when they come in here expecting to hear that i play funky with fido and they cop a face full of feminazi blah instead !. hah !
(but it may explain the reason that i have received the odd, err, interesting email of late).
... oh ... i just thought of something. if i publish THIS article, that means I SAID IT AGAIN !. that means i will never get that stupid article off my top articles list.
i might as well make that my whole blog.
mignuna. the dog sex lady.
she wrote lots of stuff, but this one thing about dog sex ... woo hoo
i have considered deleting it. of course i have. but then the google-spawned poochy pals may not get the chance to be exposed to a potential cure via my article on how to love your dog ...
... just not THAT way, please kiddies, hmm ?
