Zodiaq~ Zodiaq~

An Admin needs to check this....

An Admin needs to check this....

Somebody is obviously bombarding the newest Wallpaper additions with low ratings without even a download or comment. It's very apparent it's someone being bitter.

I think an Admin might want to look and see who's doing it
13,376 views 38 replies
Reply #26 Top
I think it's kewl when someone just "snaps"
Reply #27 Top
#26 by Citizen anthony roberts - 7/22/2003 9:32:10 PM I think it's kewl when someone just "snaps"


After seeing your 'pic' anthony...I sure hope it's not you
Reply #30 Top

The 'default' 6 is auto-loaded for those whose work DOES NOT go through moderation......my stuff for example gets an auto '6' which usually means no-one ever rates my work at all....even the admins will generally not even notice it's there....and the same goes for them....many of BoXXi's walls went up and I didn't even know they existed....because they hadn't gone through the moderation list.

Pretty well the best rating I have put on a work through moderation is a '10'.....and the worst was a 'do not upload anything like this again or your account will be deleted', but usually the lowest not to be rejected outright is about a '3'.

Many of you who go through moderation receive a '7, 8 or 9 or 10'.....which can be seen as quite legitimate, yet the auto-loaded '6' is quite often quite unfair.....either high or low [the script doesn't have skinning experience]...but perhaps averages out over all the person's submissions.

I'm not 'covering someone's butt'....I'm TELLING people that an admin has exactly the same right to an opinion of the standard of work as anyone else....

Reply #31 Top
I wonder if there's any chance there's a software glitch? I would tend to suspect something breaking or being hacked in some fashion rather than an Admin going beserker (which to me is Jafo putting up more wallpapers with Brittany and such, ). I wouldn't like to engage in such speculation until a "forensic analysis" provides some info. Better to see what the facts are before we drag out the pitchforks and torches.



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #32 Top
Oh....and Admins and moderators [in particular] are chosen for their experience.....and not their political bent...
Reply #33 Top
Ah. Of course. It is politics again. Interesting trend. Yes, always good to stir things up.
Reply #34 Top
Anyone have money on which admin? Should the betting begin?


I have a good idea but would never place a bet.
Reply #36 Top

#21 by e-bros - 7/22/2003 9:05:32 PM
People need to understand something about this site...and that is...it is run and co-operated by HUMAN BEINGS and some who do it VOLUNTARILY.

Actually, all the Admins are volunteers.  The only people who get paid for running the site are the programmers (programming doesn't work well on a volunteer basis.)

Yep, I'm at home right now recovering from surgery reading this (because I volunteer like all the other admins).  All I can speculate is that the walls have a more relaxed moderation now.  So, now instead of a "3" rated wall being rejected, it's accepted, but with the "3" (or 2 or 1) that it actually deserves.  Sounds crappy, but it's true.  And, as mentioned before, there is no automatic "6" rating.  All ratings through moderation are discussed then accepted with an appropriate rating.  All Journeymen and higher get auto-uploaded with a "6".

Reply #37 Top
Thank you for the correction on the voluntary part of the ALL admins, Admin Karmagirl.

We hope you are feeling a bit better now. Shouldn't you be resting?

Reply #38 Top
this *is* resting