galaxy cluster Abell S0740

space is beautiful......





This stunning group of galaxies is far, far away - about 450 million light-years from planet Earth
82,439 views 33 replies
Reply #1 Top
stupid forum format, and i can't seem to edit the post above, so to see a larger version click HERE...

Reply #2 Top
you could just post the original size of the image, and it will auto scale down to fit the forum

NICE, so now we just gotta get the technology for light speed. So we can be there in 5-6 generations or go into hibernation.

i wounder whats out there...
Reply #3 Top
thats a phony edited picture, you can see where the pixels dont line up.
Reply #4 Top
Don't be so sure Schem. Check these out.

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap051122.html

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap000201.html

Reply #5 Top
those are uniform in pixels, the other picture isnt.
Reply #6 Top
the picture came right off the nasa site...

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070208.html

take that doubters!!!
Reply #7 Top
fine, but it still looks cheezy, and they didnt do a great job on the pixels.
Reply #8 Top
Io!!!
Reply #9 Top
Nothing in space looks like that, all those pretty colors is the way telescopes register different gas makeups.
Reply #10 Top
yeah, but its still cool.
Reply #11 Top
Yes, but it generates this whole feeling in the public that space is a beutiful place.
Reply #12 Top
and it is. its just not colorful.
Reply #13 Top
How is the same color beutiful   

I mean sometimes it interesting to notice patterns, but thats from down here. Must look kind of boring out of a window of a shuttle.
Reply #14 Top
agh!!! my ears, they burn with your heresy!!!
my eyes burn with your post!!!
my hands burn for absolutely no good reason!!!

get out of my sight.   
Reply #15 Top
huh, your saying theres no colors in space??
Reply #16 Top
what I think he's trying to point out is that there is no beauty in space simply because its not a picasso painting.
I personally think that its the beauty of logic and logos, not beauty of pathos that matters. I guess thats why people find me quirky.
Reply #17 Top
But there are colors in space right? as i remember from school, everything has a color. Well nothing has its own color, hehe just dont remember how it was.
I remember that my teacher told me something about a red mail box (yeah they are red in denmark) that it wasent really red at all. Something about light.
Reply #18 Top
yes, in fact stars are actually the release of a full spectrum of colors

as for the fact about mailboxes it works like this:
things of "color" look like the exact color that they aren't. they absorb all the frequencies of light OTHER THAN the frequency that they appear to be.

to be frank only luminescant things have "color". everything else is just "colored" what they dont absorb.
Reply #19 Top
aah yeah, now i start to remember

so black is absorbing all colors right? and thats why its black?

hmm, i need to go back to school, maybe its becuase im getting older and this stuff is getting more interesting
Reply #20 Top
yes, black is what your mind fills in when it doesnt recieve any data.
Reply #21 Top
I am just saying that space isnt all that it is made up to be. Its just that space, with about 10% of it actually being filled with anything of interested. And I think less than 1% would actually interest anyone here who has a physics or astromony degree. While the rest of us get whooed by pretty pictures that are part of NASAs propoganda program(its all lies i tell you!!).
Reply #22 Top
well for all the billion $$$ that are used, i can understand some need to publish, just something. To get ppl to support the space program.

Btw hows ya black goverment doing? i dont hear about em so much
Reply #23 Top
I dont get the last comment...

*procesor overloading, requesting quotum upgrade*
Reply #24 Top
10% of space full? you can subtract a couple of dozen 0's from that figure.


Long rant coming up, skipping to the end is advised





Also, space IS that colorfull, you just can't see it. (huh?) That image is a composite of a lot of different pictures, all of which have different shutter times, focus etc. As suns reach different mass, they reach different heat levels, which in turn gives of another color. (blue=hot, red=cold)

The color also depends on the stars "atmosphere", which adds what is called "abosortion lines" to the spectrum (caused by materials absorbing a certain wave length). With an "atmosphere as our sun and Sirius have, give distinct hydrogen lines. while Ursa majoris give of a distinct carbon line.

This effect makes our sun yellow, with a yellow sheen (no big difference) but it makes Sirius white with a yellow sheen, which can be detected.

looking at the spectral lines, one can easily distinguish between a stars heat and it's components (and thus day something of it's age)

of course, with nebulea reflecting this light (them being mostly white) they asume the same color, which is what we can see.

The problem with telescopes is that they only have a very small area on which they focus, so you can't take a picture of such a large region at once. Therefore they make composites from several smaller pictures, which show each 'shiny' as good as it can.

Hubble however, does not have a color camera. It's essentially black and white. However it uses filters from a very broad range to generate a picture. Most of the colors are added later to clear up the picture or to compensate for our eyes' lack of seeing IR and UV light. They are sometimes representative of the real light that is send out/reflected from the body.





Long story short, Stars do have that many colors, hubble doesn't record them though. These colors are added later. this is how the universe looks


Reply #25 Top
Stars yes, nebulas no

We can not see the differance in the color of stars, and even then it is only slight shades of orange or red, or white or blue. Booooooooooooring, if you ask me.

ZZZZzzzzZZZZzzzz....