So I just watched Stargate....

...and they seem pretty royally screwed. But I guess that's just the norm
53,255 views 36 replies
Reply #1 Top
At least until this season's finale.   

Although, in SG:A, the Orion sure didn't last that long. DOH!
Reply #2 Top
It wasn't that great looking of a ship anyway.
No big loss.
Reply #4 Top
what happened i havnt watched them yet
Reply #5 Top
the show seemed good if you ask me it was what i expected yet im not shure about the orion it was kind of ugly looking, kinda stupid to let it get distroyed though
Reply #7 Top
GOD I HATE THE SCI FI CHANNEL.



Noooooo! SciFi is OK, look at BSG... It's just that Stargate: Atlantis sucks!
Reply #8 Top
Ever since Dean Anderson left/became less active, Stargate SG-1 has been getting worse. As for Atlantis, it has been getting slowly better, but it is no where near as good as SG-1.
Reply #9 Top
I'm not sure I'm liking this whole King Arthur and Merlin spin lately. Seems very hokey. And what's with the kid? Didn't they learn from George Lucas to stop using them???
Reply #10 Top
After Richard Dean Anderson left SG1, it's not going very far. I mean, 10 seasons? They're used practically every story line possible. I like SG Atlantis better, the base is just cool looking

But both Stargates don't compare to BSG. That show is awesome.
Reply #12 Top
Battlestar Galactica. Usually in reference to the newer reenvisioning of the classic late 70s series.
Reply #13 Top
Notice how Claudia Black is now in the credits for SG-1. Pretty soon it will be Farscape SG-1.   
Reply #14 Top
Bite your tounges!!! SG-1 is better than Atlantis. SG-1 did lose something in the last two years, ever since Frasier died I've been alittle pissed. However, SG-1's decline is slowing, I suspect that by the middle of this season it will have re-established the goodness.

As for Battlestar Galactica.... It can't compare to SG-1, maybe Atlantis... maybe.

I didn't like the Orion blowing up so early. It would have been much better had they just said there was irreperable damage to some systems. Perhaps saying that they lacked the expertise and resources to repair the systems.

I also like this whole "Retro-Wraith are shunned" thing. Now that they've retro-ed a whole hive they can "accidently" create an entire new faction of wraith that had previously been retro-ed. The big problem these wraith will have is the lack of a queen.

Anyway, my only dissapointment is that I don't have a time machine that will let me see next weeks episode
Reply #15 Top
I admit it, these opening episodes were not as good as they could have been. The only thing that bugs me is how some of the new characters brought in from last season try to be too much like their predecessors or counterparts.

For instance Lt. Col. Mitchell seems to try and simulate Jack O'neal a little too much. I was hoping Ben's character would be different in personality. Same with the General, they just seem too act too much like the previous characters. On Atlantis I didn't like how Aiden Ford was suddenly replaced with Ronan. Who's character is far too cliched and simular to Teal'c.

The only interesting characters on Atlantis IMO are Dr. Mckay, Dr. Weir, Dr.Beckett and Zelenka. Most of the other characters, Sheppard, Teyla and Ronan are way too cliched. On SG-1 Dr. Jackson and Carter are the only characters I think are unique to that show.

As far as BSG, I don't think you can really compare it to the Stargate shows. I mean other than being Science Fiction, they have different scenarios. Stargate is interesting because it takes place in modern day, going through these "Stargates" on missions and such. Though BSG is interesting as well, its not your typical "Earch is united" facing off against some alien bent on destroying you.
Reply #16 Top
BSG is my favorite, then SGA. Don't like SG1 much because a couple of the characters I don't care for. Like the cast of SGA better. Really like the ambience of BSG and the the cast. $.02
Reply #17 Top
I assume you all mean the last of season 9? I just watched it and i laughed the whole time. I dont think ive ever seen the "good guys" in any show/movie get so royally f##ked up! i mean i was expecting them to lose but i figured theyd do at least sme damage.
Reply #18 Top
I think that in SG1 it feels like a war now. With the snakes it really didn't feel like one all the time because of all the infighting and such. I like it, and I can't wait to see what they will come up with to beat those seemingly impenetrable shields.
Reply #19 Top
Yeah... I am wondering the same thing. There is like no way to defeat the all powerful Ori *bows down* haha
Reply #20 Top
Well, what makes me wonder is why are the Ori using plasma lances and everyone else still using rail guns and what looks like a laser variation? You would think the Gua'uld, Ancients, Asgard, or even humans would at least attempt a plasma weapon by now.

So, yeah, heros royally screwed.

Oh, and no, I don't think Mitchel is trying to emulate O'Neal. Any of you ever watch Farscape? He acted exactly the same way in it, and even became just as dark and moody. And, besides, he doesn't have O'Neal's flair for poking fun at their opposition, nor does he even try to.

As for BSG: I'm sorry, but BSG is not cutting it for me. For one thing, they're trying to rehash the feel of Farscape to draw in those fans, and for another they keep making indirect references to the modern invasion of Iraq as well as religious wars in the past. Basically, they're trying to pull a Star Trek. And they're failing miserably and annoying those of us who can see through the pitiful excuse for a veil they have. Besides, I don't watch scifi to see a bunch of people take potshots at a religion. At least they didn't have the guts to name the half-Cylon child Christos.
Reply #21 Top
if you ask me, stargate is a pretty awful show anywya, i wont lie i watch it on a regular bases on sky one everyday cuz well rest of tv is even worse at that time, well apart from deal or no deal and its logic is purely stupid, hough a good foudnation is there. its not great but its watchable...
i mean for instance, these lil self replicating robot the Azguard cant beat, they get carter to help beat them and they destroy them by blowing a ship up and taking them out with it, when its been prove tat solid bullets destroy, so why not loose the laser weaponry and replace it with bullet or mass driver weaponry? good not that clever a race or carter??
or those bloody prymids, how on earth do they actually fly, yet alone go in and out of a planets atmosphere and i like the way everything is controlled with well crystals, yet there is no logic to how u get data on them, or evne how the hell the crystla works, it just does and the prymids just fly with there own controls.
then again saying all this, if you dont take it seriously at all it is quite a good comedy based sci fi show.
Reply #22 Top
Actually, the crystal concept is based on real science. There's been a long-standing scientific theory that, in time, we will begin to store massive amounts of data on crystals. This is based, in part, on the very silicon that now is a key component in our current computer technology.

Oh, and in case you haven't noticed, most races of that technology level don't have mass drivers of any sort. They don't even have missiles. They're probably so far advanced that they don't even remember how to make a simple projectile weapon, just like how most people today don't remember how to make an arrow. Thus, they have to rely on a more primitive race to supply technology they simply forgot about.

One of the perils of scientific advancement is that you forget the basics. We see this every day in our society, as even now there are some who never read anything that isn't found on a computer screen.
Reply #23 Top
it wasn't that, it was the fact they asked her for her help, and instead of syaing,ok lets now work together to build a mass driver missle weapon and help u further...
also sims, they do my nut in, stick one in and your super human but there just a lil slithery snake that sit around your small intestine and somehow interact.
im not syaing crystals are dumb, im syaing there explanation for ttem and how carter knows them is dumb, like when they were stealing i think a huket its called, she was like pull out all the green ones, how does she know that, there were only 3 colours, yellow,red and green and about 25 of each, and pulling out one green one closed a door, just seemed stupid to me.
and how they control the ships to, lets touch a red bland crystal block with nothing on it, but it does everything from weapons to flying,must be some sorta mind link that i dont know about
but then every sci fi show has it flaws, i just feel stargate has more,like i said,its good for comedy
Reply #24 Top
Actually, if you look at the earlier seasons, they originally had no clue what to do. Plus, consider they have a Jaffa with them. Tealc could probably easily educate them on what the basics are, and trial and error telling them the rest. By the time we get to the current season, human scientists not only knew enough about the tech to combine it with human tech, but to manage to produce human versions of it.

And, yes, they have found tech before where they didn't know what it does, and with one item they spent most of the episode toying with it to undo what they accidentally did. In any case, they don't show a lot of the advancements in tech that humans make based on their observations and experimentations with alien tech because, well, it's boring.

Oh, and the Gua'uld are not entirely what you think. They're symbiotes. In Jaffa, they completely replace the immune system (part of how they fit into the stomach cavity). They need wet places to mature in, and what better place than a humanoid body? Once they take a host, they bond with the spine, not the guts. Oh, and for real fun, look at real life stories of people. Trust me, they have yet to do anything on the show with those symbiotes that is actually outside the capacity of the human body.

Finally, answer this question: What need would the Asgard have for projectile weapons? Finally, what makes you think they actually have the technological capacity to create them? A projectile weapon probably requires a complete retooling of their factory system. Something that can take years, and doesn't exactly help when you need the weapon by tomorrow. Or, if you're under attack, by yesterday.
Reply #25 Top
i watched a programme once about stargate and they explained about those simbionts or howeve rits spelt hehe, heres a tip.. do a google search for tape worms


http://www.bartleby.com/65/ta/tapeworm.html is a small link too if ya feeling lazy