For clarification, I gave it almost a week with no response, and that is when I started replying to it.
Also, activity by itself should not be a valid reason for being "pushed down" in priority. I would suggest if you have to prioritize tickets that way, then prioritize them on whether someone from Stardock has had activity (responded to) on the ticket, not when the client has responded.
And keep in mind, this is the first response I have had from Stardock since I first posted the issue Oct 31 (7 days later).
Thank you for your quick response to this post and I will reference the ticket response and hopefully we can resolve soon.