have I pointed out that what we're arguing about is pointless anyway? You cannot judge education accurately through income. not to mention a decade is a lot of time for new people to enter the economy, and old people to leave it.
Actually thats false. Many studies and IQ surveys have returned with very positive results. People with more money are indeed more intelligent and have a better education.
As for the arguement of old people leaving and new people coming, I just have to say that there are a lot more new people coming then going.
fine, grad students, medical students, law students.
I'm fairly certain they would not be targeted by this survey, but then again I would need to see some refrances.
You know not once did you ask him who conducted this, I mean for all you know the information could be biased or false based on the researcher.
As for tge, not a lot to argue on, he hasn't attempted to refute my shooting the shit out of his side of your argument that I pulled out of my ass.
This setance has problems.
guess I could have gotten him for his idiotic statement that the rich probably gained a hundred times more, he either didn't read or skimmed as well, but you're doing such a good job that pointing out the loss in income for the wealthy is a moot point
First off I was exagerating, second off I have much better things to do with my time then read statistics. And as for the rich lossing income you have to be joking me.
this is what he said, despite the fact that according to your survey the rich fall out of power very quickly, only a small minority remain in position etc.
Which can't possibly be true. In the US, the distance between those in poverty and those in the top income bracket is probably one of the biggest in the world. And its been increasing.
that, my friend, is debate 101. You need some classes in it.
Personally you both need some classes on how to better use your time.
I mean sheesh it took me like 10 minutes to read all this. I wonder how long it took to type and put together.
