Haree78

[quote who="strikesback5" reply="3" id="2252642"]Atleast Metroid stands a chance against Star Trek (I can't say the same for Halo).[/quote]

[quote who="strikesback5" reply="12" id="2252650"]I'm a troll? I'm a more respected member than you are, and you call me a troll?[/quote]

Ok, pretty sure you're just a troll/spammer now. Reported as such.

[quote who="CenturionJixra" reply="24" id="2252550"]I'm an unappologetic crusader for online multiplayer and I think it's a tragedy that only a small percentage of the people who purchased this game ever contemplated coming online. So, when someone puts up a thread complaining about the AI's lack of strategic decision making, it's an open invitation to encourage people to come try the game online. People have a great many misconceptions about online multiplayer and I want to clear

[quote who="adecoy95" reply="19" id="2252428"]i could be wrong, but company of heroes has an incredible ai in that game, even on normal difficulty it beats me about half the time... it depends on the map tho, the ai can be scary on maps like hill 331 they also use their patch efforts on upgrading their ai, not just balance changes, something every rts should do....[/quote] I'm struggling to believe this one, I played Relic's previous game, Dawn of War, pretty much the same

No, the AI does not suck. Compared to other RTS it uses a lot more clever techniques. After you've been playing some time you will be able to beat the AI no problem because you have worked out some niches in it's armour and how and where it is likely to attack, tell me an RTS AI that isn't like that? You can then just stack the teams a little to make it challenging. You and an AI vs 3 AI for example and ramp it up, as long as you don't require fair sides to have fu

[quote who="Annatar11" reply="4" id="2244184"]You can't really continuously use Grav Warhead and Nano in battle, and sometimes they start running when you enter the grav well without engaging.[/quote] You can use Nano continuously in battle and as soon as they start to flee you will easily have enough AM for several GWs. [quote who="Annatar11" reply="4" id="2244184"]We must be playing a different game. You cast it on a clump of brittle ships that go pop quickly. There

Dude stop making threads. Next time you go to post a thread think and ask yourself these simple questions. 1) Is there a thread on this subject already? 2) Have I actually got anything to say? 3) Do people really give a shit about what I'm going to say? If you did ask yourself these questions on your recent threads you have posted then I can assure you, you were wrong on 1 or more of the above questions.

[quote who="Annatar11" reply="2" id="2244162"]Well, if you don't bother with the speed boost then it's more about your playing style than the usefulness of the ability, isn't it? I always have a Marauder for the speed boost, because it easily lets you catch up to a fleet that's trying to jump out so you can nuke it with a Grav Warhead from your egg and rip it to shreds.[/quote] Perhaps, if I'm outvoted on this I'm willing to concede I must just not 'get' the ship or something, but I d

[quote who="Annatar11" reply="12" id="2242398"]They are plenty balanced. The difference is how people play. Fleets don't get maxed out in typical MP games. But try to deal with 100+ bombers/fighters without a few Flak Bursts from Kols, and try keeping your level 10 capitals alive in the end-game without Dunov's shield restore. The vast majority of the existing capital abilities have a good use, just that some don't come into play because people play short games.[/quote] But

[quote who="Annatar11" reply="7" id="2241994"]Don't think it's necessary to question the man's moving decisions, much easier and more effective to just show him he made some rather incorrect assumptions about Impulse [/quote] I was just trying to make the point that if someone complains that I convinced them to buy Cordial and they then turn round to me and say I just moved to a house with no running water your advice was rubish, my opinion is that the guys created his own downfall.</

Entrenchment 1.02 observations: Seige frigates were overnerfed a LONG time ago and are still today just as useless. A thought to improve them, how about increasing their damage vs planets but make it dependant on anti matter. So just after jumping anywhere they do very little damage for a while but as the AM recharges they become more effective. So hit and run tactics are still bad but they are good at doing the job we are paying so dearly for. The Jasarul Ev

Why did you move to a home with no internet?

[quote who="RegnorVex" reply="23" id="2241847"] Quoting TiduZ, reply 21Yea another few months in development would of made a lot of sense. Yeah, but that should have been done *before* launch. You don't usually get a 2nd chance to have a successful launch.[/quote] But even after all this work it's only fixed things well in certain regions. I know full well that UK is still shite, none of my friends who I convinced to buy this [e digicons]:X[/e] can get a

[quote who="si1foo" reply="14" id="2241615"]this game has hardly any infulence nobody over here in the uk even knows about it so i highly doubt it will make a big impact[/quote] Personally I don't think they should release this game in the UK, the connection handling in Demigod is so ropey here.

I can't work out if you are trolling or just stupid.

[quote who="Annatar11" reply="12" id="2236915"]How can you people not look forward to what will hopefully will be a well done Aliens game? Seriously, what kind of geeks are you people [/quote] If Aliens Colonial Marines is as well done and as fun as Left 4 Dead but with authentic Aliens atmosphere and enough content to make it a long experience then I will campaign to get UK law changed so I can marry it.

Will we get to play as Jedi in this game or classes like in SW Galaxies?

[quote who="DamienShade" reply="9" id="2237650"]Basically what I take from this is that Valve took all the updates they were going to do for Left 4 Dead (like they do for TF2), put them in a new package, and called it a sequel so they could charge for it.[/quote] Maybe it cost them a lot more than they expected? They aren't a charity, they do need to make money. Just look at it this way, they are still updating TF2 and Counter Strike at no profit so it's not like they ch

[quote who="Solam" reply="16" id="2227673"]I always laugh when I see specific people like Thompson fellow trying to enforce their own values on everybody else. I am a parent of three kids and I will be the judge of what they can and cannot play. Not this Thompson fellow. So if my kids do buy a game and I find it's not appropriate I WILL decide what to do. Nobody else. I wish somebody would tell him that[/quote] You obviously can't be trusted porn peddler!<

My issue with the single player is the terrible Tournament feature. Basically attempt to be so incredible that you can beat multiple AI who are cheating to hell while you have mentally retarded team mates killing themselves on the opponents towers. The Hard tournament was doable but the Insane Tournament is like knocking down a wall with a spoon. No matter how good you are how are you meant to stop your suicidal team mates feeding them too much gold? Not to mention

Not sure about Australia, I don't think the problem will be your ping but rather potential router or ISP issues. In the UK for example my friends and I cannot reliably play Demigod online because in the UK we use ADSL it seems we have quite different issues to North Americans. Even with the latest patch I get in 1 in 5 Pantheon games because there will be someone who can't connect. And I'm extremely tech savvy and have tried everything. The download is about 2GB.

I'm going to ask you the obvious question first which may be your issue, is it a purchased version or pirate version?

When was he funny? I must have missed that post.

[quote who="Frogboy" reply="4" id="2215046"]I banned him.[/quote] Good job, he's the sort of person why multiplayer gaming stinks.