Question about media players

Might I suggest useing classic skins for WinAmp?!
Some modern skins tend to suck up a fair bit of CPU juice!

Cant really suggest other players though, since WinAmp has been my fave for the last umm.... many years

Both WA and QCD seem to use up quite a bit of resources, whether minimized or not, and particularly when not minimized

This suggests to me that the real culprit is video. Specifically, I would guess that the skin you are using has some type of animation, scrolling text, etc which requires a significant amount of redrawing. What type of video card are you using and how much Video RAM does it have? If the card is older/slower and has little or no Video RAM, then your computer has to draw on system resources to accomplish that redrawing.

I like QCD quite a bit and find it to be far less piggish than Winamp 5 with a modern skin on my underpowered computer. It's about on par with with Winamp using a classic skin.

That said, I've pretty much been using Foobar for the most part, especially with the UI Columns plugin
[Message Edited]

A decent media utility is Media player Classic.
Not only does it handle most formats, codecs and whatnot, It's Free.


http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=82303&package_id=84358

The only annoyance, is when some pins in file graphs fail to initialize, it messages ya.
This can be turned off, in the preff's.

The players works decent, and seems to be low res usage, and the UI is straight forward.
Feel free to give it a try.

Cool Player is a good alternative for a media player that's light on resources and it's skinnable.

http://coolplayer.sourceforge.net/

Thanks, DavidK. I downloaded Coolplayer, and I'm trying it. I never tried it before because I was happy with WinAmp. Anyway, I gotta say, the default skin for CoolPlayer is UGGGLLLY..... You know what they say..... "There's no accountin' for taste."

Anyway, it does work well, easy on resources, though I do like Winamp better. I only use the Winamp default skin, but vary the color schemes. Great program. Anyone have the Pro version? Is it worth the money? I just downloaded Deep Burn for burning my mp3's to CD's, but it doesn't seem to recognize file names. Just lists them as Track 1, Track 2, etc. Spoze I can't complain DeepBurner is free. I believe WA Pro has burn capability, which sure could be handy.

And, speaking of skins, I cannot figure out how to apply the CoolPlayer skins. I've downloaded two, unzipped them to the CoolPlayer folder, but the program just doesn't see them. Also, why doesn't SDC list CoolPlayer?.

TIA

OOps!!!! Just after I hit send on the last post, I realized that I might offend someone about calling the CoolPlayer skin ugly. I apologize. Truly. Maybe it's me and my taste.
/me is sorry.

Coolplayer is not a Stardock product...

Jafo, of course. I shoulda known. So, does that mean I don't have to worry about offending anyone, or not?

I think I'm sticking with WinAmp. The resource difference is not that significant, and WA is alot nicer to run.

Thanks anyway....

dabe....as skinners we generally resist denigrating any specific skinnable software....not all that 'clever' to do so.

We may be frustrated with one vs another...but all these proggies are what we 'play with'.....so they are our 'friends'...